en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/509652 Comments by MetsLv31 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/poll-biggest-worry/#IDComment19488924 I'm pretty sure his point is if you're looking at last year by ERA, none of the bottom 10 teams were .500 or better. If you're looking at the top 10 teams, only one was sub-.500. Somehow, this seems like more than a coincidence. Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:57:27 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/poll-biggest-worry/#IDComment19488924 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436991 Well, it doesn't help that Jerry is taking out Church and Castillo....Explain to me again why Shef is doing anything other then riding the pine and pinch-hitting? Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:46:41 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436991 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436909 Dropping him in the order is supposed to fix his confidence issues? Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:44 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436909 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436590 I haven't sifted through the 100 other posts so forgive me if my point is repetitive. I'm sick and tired of the "men left on base" argument. If you're team is 4th in the NL in hits, that means you have a lot of men on base which I feel like is a good thing. It would be better if we just scattered 4 hits throughout the game, because then we would have left less men on right? Look, I get it. We aren't bringing the people in as we should and that's an issue that should be discussed. But talk to me about runs scored or RISP or some other useful way to measure that we're having issues. Not men left on base, which is stupid. Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:35:10 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436590