<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1342211</link>
		<description>Comments by Media_Bladders</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Rush Remembers Breitbart</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/rush-remembers-breitbart/#IDComment306579616</link>
<description>Prove that Obama did marijuana and cocaine?? Gee, that&amp;#039;s a tough one ... you might actually have to go to a library and check out &amp;quot;Dreams of My Father.&amp;quot;   No, wait -- save yourself the gasoline (which keeps skyrocketing in price under Dear Leader anyway) and introduce yourself to Mr. Google. There you&amp;#039;ll find plenty of excerpts quoting his admitted drug use. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/rush-remembers-breitbart/#IDComment306579616</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : US Communist Leader: &#039;Progressive Change Is Closer than We Think&#039;</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tloudon/2011/12/28/us-communist-leader-progressive-change-is-closer-than-we-think/#IDComment249287897</link>
<description>Tyner talks big, but I can read between the lines. He&amp;#039;s whistling past the graveyard, because the far left just shot its wad with Occupy Wall Street and what was the result?    Well ... nothing of consequence. No laws or corporate policies were changed, and the entire Astroturf movement wore out its welcome even with Democrat mayors.     Tyner doesn&amp;#039;t fool me. He&amp;#039;s not confident -- he&amp;#039;s scared to death that his government-sucking Teat Party is on the decline as taxpayers choose between higher taxes and greater benefits for &amp;quot;the 11%&amp;quot; ... the minority of workers who belong to labor unions. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tloudon/2011/12/28/us-communist-leader-progressive-change-is-closer-than-we-think/#IDComment249287897</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Affordable Care? New Obamacare Fee Coming to Health Insurance in 2012</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/27/affordable-care-new-obamacare-fee-coming-to-health-insurance-in-2012/#IDComment249282289</link>
<description>Yeah, they and the rest of that parade of losers are probably thinking to themselves, &amp;quot;By the time the debt bomb explodes, we&amp;#039;ll all be dead!&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/27/affordable-care-new-obamacare-fee-coming-to-health-insurance-in-2012/#IDComment249282289</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Affordable Care? New Obamacare Fee Coming to Health Insurance in 2012</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/27/affordable-care-new-obamacare-fee-coming-to-health-insurance-in-2012/#IDComment249017426</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s my caption for that picture:  &amp;quot;And this stick figure with the rock on his back represents you at the age of 21, carrying $100 trillion of debt that my administration will leave behind ...&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/27/affordable-care-new-obamacare-fee-coming-to-health-insurance-in-2012/#IDComment249017426</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Stephanopoulos To Replace Amanpour On &quot;This Week&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/12/13/stephanopoulos-to-replace-amanpour-on-this-week/#IDComment237385725</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Amanpour is very good in an international role; the American political spectrum is beyond the construct in which viewers are used to seeing her. Audiences tend to gravitate to old standbys during an election cycle, and Stephanopoulos fits that bill better than does Amanpour &amp;mdash; whereas he would not fare as well if his scope consisted of international reporting.&amp;quot; __________________________________________  *** Huh??   I take issue with this paragraph on several counts, namely:  1. Amanpour is not &amp;quot;very good&amp;quot; in ANY role -- other than serving as a ventriloquist&amp;#039;s dummy for the far left.  2. Audiences apparently aren&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;gravitating toward&amp;quot; ABC&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;This Week&amp;quot; regardless of who&amp;#039;s hosting the program. Under Amanpour, the program went from third in the ratings to ... umm, third in the ratings.  3. I also question Amanpour&amp;#039;s supposed &amp;quot;longing to do more field reporting.&amp;quot; The standard spin-doctored excuse for people who step down from prominent jobs is that they wanted to spend more time with their family, pursue a different career track, return to a job they liked better, etc.   It usually adds up to the same 7-letter word: FAILURE. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/12/13/stephanopoulos-to-replace-amanpour-on-this-week/#IDComment237385725</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : &lt;i&gt;NY Times&lt;/i&gt;: No More #OWS Coverage for Reporter/Activist </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/10/24/ny-times-no-more-ows-coverage-for-reporteractivist/#IDComment212103190</link>
<description>&amp;quot;All our journalists, staff or freelance, are expected to adhere to our ethical rules and journalistic standards, and to avoid doing anything that could call into question the impartiality of their work for The Times.&amp;quot;   Umm ... too late for that.  However, the Times could at least do the right thing by severing ties with Lennard. Simply saying, &amp;quot;OK, she won&amp;#039;t be covering OWS anymore&amp;quot; is like a judge saying, &amp;quot;I won&amp;#039;t sentence Bernie Madoff to prison if he agrees never to run an investment company again.&amp;quot;  Incidentally, isn&amp;#039;t it hilariously hypocritical that closet anti-capitalist Lennard is getting her freelance paychecks from -- gasp! -- an evil media corporation? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/10/24/ny-times-no-more-ows-coverage-for-reporteractivist/#IDComment212103190</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : &lt;i&gt;NY Times&lt;/i&gt;: No More #OWS Coverage for Reporter/Activist </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/10/24/ny-times-no-more-ows-coverage-for-reporteractivist/#IDComment212100299</link>
<description>&amp;quot;All our journalists, staff or freelance, are expected to adhere to our ethical rules and journalistic standards, and to avoid doing anything that could call into question the impartiality of their work for The Times.&amp;quot;  Umm ... too late for that.   However, the Times could at least do the right thing by severing ties with Lennard. Simply saying, &amp;quot;OK, she won&amp;#039;t be covering OWS anymore&amp;quot; is like a judge saying, &amp;quot;I won&amp;#039;t sentence Bernie Madoff to prison if he agrees never to run an investment company again.&amp;quot;  Incidentally, isn&amp;#039;t it hilariously hypocritical that closet anti-capitalist Lennard is getting her freelance paychecks from -- gasp! -- an evil media corporation? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/10/24/ny-times-no-more-ows-coverage-for-reporteractivist/#IDComment212100299</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wisconsin Collective Bargaining Changes Published</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bhealy/2011/06/28/wisconsin-collective-bargaining-changes-published/#IDComment167728329</link>
<description>As the lefties once chanted:  &amp;quot;THIS is what democracy looks like.&amp;quot;  Sorry, Richard Trumka -- even with your busloads of rent-a-mobs, you failed. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bhealy/2011/06/28/wisconsin-collective-bargaining-changes-published/#IDComment167728329</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Elections Matter! In Wisconsin and Everywhere</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mangley/2011/06/14/elections-matter-in-wisconsin-and-everywhere/#IDComment162800085</link>
<description>Yep, when you&amp;#039;ve got the vampire on his back, don&amp;#039;t hesitate ... drive the stake through his heart.   Time to send the union thugs packing -- with their tail between their legs -- and do whatever is necessary to ensure that the pipeline of tax money to the Democratic Party is never re-created. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mangley/2011/06/14/elections-matter-in-wisconsin-and-everywhere/#IDComment162800085</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Salon’s Joan Walsh: Weiner ‘Made Me Look Stupid’</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/salons-joan-walsh-weiner-made-me-look-stupid/#IDComment161077726</link>
<description>With their reality-denying excuses, Walsh and Press sound like bad parents covering for their juvenile delinquent child.  Imagine if they were a married couple and their son had been nabbed in a bicycle theft ring. I can guess what they&amp;#039;d be saying right about now:   &amp;quot;But officer, how do you know that the 15 bicycles hidden in our garage are the same bikes as the 15 that were stolen in our subdivision last night? Isn&amp;#039;t it just possible that Bill Jr. bought every one of those bikes with the money that he earned from his paper route? Until we have an investigation, let&amp;#039;s not accuse!&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/salons-joan-walsh-weiner-made-me-look-stupid/#IDComment161077726</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Lot of Coincidences in Weiner&#039;s Tale</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/05/31/a-lot-of-coincidences-in-weiners-tale/#IDComment158227772</link>
<description>But the cops and FBI aren&amp;#039;t always obligated to investigate when the so-called &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; doesn&amp;#039;t ask them to. Look at how many cases of wife beating are never pursued.  Conversely, Weiner can&amp;#039;t expect us to buy into his &amp;quot;I was hacked&amp;quot; story if he&amp;#039;s not even willing to report the case to the authorities and cooperate in an investigation. Let&amp;#039;s keep in mind that he knows very well that if he&amp;#039;s lying, a false report of that nature could land him behind bars.  At this point, on the credibility scale, Weiner ranks right up there with the guy who wakes up on his front lawn after a night on the town and tells everybody he was mugged on the way home ... but that he has no intention of reporting it to the police.  &amp;quot;Innocent until proven guilty&amp;quot; doesn&amp;#039;t apply to a politician&amp;#039;s credibility. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/05/31/a-lot-of-coincidences-in-weiners-tale/#IDComment158227772</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wisconsin Supreme Court Race Ends in Virtual Tie</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bhealy/2011/04/06/wisconsin-supreme-court-race-ends-in-virtual-tie/#IDComment140727300</link>
<description>Why do Republicans always behave like Boy Scouts when it&amp;#039;s obvious that they&amp;#039;re stuck in a rigged carnival game?  What I mean is this: Judge Sumi will do everything within her power to delay her decision until the new liberal judge can be seated.   Why, then, don&amp;#039;t Walker and the rest of the GOP adopt the strategy of President Obama whenever he loses a case -- simply issue a new executive order or, in this case, pass a new law that&amp;#039;s similar to the old one. Now that the Democrats are on this side of the state border, is there any reason the legislature can&amp;#039;t simply meet again and pass a new law that supersedes the one Sumi is doing her best to thwart? Is the legislative session over?   I hate to say this, but the Republicans should have realized from day one that they were going to get screwed by Judge Sumi ... and they should have immediately pursued a parallel path with the legislation. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bhealy/2011/04/06/wisconsin-supreme-court-race-ends-in-virtual-tie/#IDComment140727300</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : SEIU Invades Bank Offices to Harass and Intimidate Executive</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/seiu-invades-bank-offices-to-harass-and-intimidate-executive/#IDComment136506837</link>
<description>And the left likes to claim that Tea Party members look like derelicts? Whew -- take a look at the motley bunch of losers in that union rent-a-mob. Huge guts and butts. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/seiu-invades-bank-offices-to-harass-and-intimidate-executive/#IDComment136506837</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Update on Union Battles in Wisconsin, and Mitch Daniels&#039; Bad Example</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/newledger/2011/02/23/update-on-union-battles-in-wisconsin-and-mitch-daniels-bad-example/#IDComment130199767</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m from Indiana, and I was never all that enthralled with Mitch Daniels as a presidential candidate. Of course, I&amp;#039;m even less so now.   Actually, the unions did us a favor by exposing Daniels&amp;#039; lack of won tons. Better to find out now than after he got elected to a higher office -- one John McCain is more than enough. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/newledger/2011/02/23/update-on-union-battles-in-wisconsin-and-mitch-daniels-bad-example/#IDComment130199767</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Olbermann Suspended from MSNBC Indefinitely</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2010/11/05/report-olbermann-suspended-from-msnbc/#IDComment108149776</link>
<description>Sure, if Hannity&amp;#039;s show has an opening for a janitor.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2010/11/05/report-olbermann-suspended-from-msnbc/#IDComment108149776</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Olbermann Suspended from MSNBC Indefinitely</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2010/11/05/report-olbermann-suspended-from-msnbc/#IDComment108149055</link>
<description>He was just about to torch it ... you just can&amp;#039;t see the cigarette lighter in his other hand. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2010/11/05/report-olbermann-suspended-from-msnbc/#IDComment108149055</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Media Acknowledges Obama&#039;s Declining Influence</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2010/11/05/media-acknowledges-obamas-declining-influence/#IDComment108148317</link>
<description>Does this mean that Evan Thomas of Newsweek no longer considers Obama &amp;quot;sort of God&amp;quot;??? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2010/11/05/media-acknowledges-obamas-declining-influence/#IDComment108148317</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Media Acknowledges Obama&#039;s Declining Influence</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2010/11/05/media-acknowledges-obamas-declining-influence/#IDComment108148126</link>
<description>If you like music videos that make fun of liberals, check out the latest one by the Minnesotans for Global Warming at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.m4gw.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.m4gw.com&lt;/a&gt; -- &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;m a Denier,&amp;quot; sung to the tune of &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;m a Believer.&amp;quot;   Funny stuff! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2010/11/05/media-acknowledges-obamas-declining-influence/#IDComment108148126</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Maddow Can&#039;t Take Criticism During Interview with Republican Candidate</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/mdake/2010/10/12/maddow-cant-take-criticism-during-interview-with-republican-candidate/#IDComment103942235</link>
<description>If Maddow&amp;#039;s show is your idea of &amp;quot;the most balanced show on TV,&amp;quot; I have to question your definition of balance. A freshman journalism student could see that her sole goal is to nail Robinson with an embarrassing admission that could spell the end of his candidacy.  Do you not get the fact that Maddow&amp;#039;s frustration stems from the fact that she couldn&amp;#039;t lure him into saying something damaging? And did you miss the way she structured her question -- &amp;quot;Do you still believe that?&amp;quot; -- which is the equivalent of saying, &amp;quot;Do you still beat your wife?&amp;quot;  Sorry, but that&amp;#039;s not balance, Maddow isn&amp;#039;t a journalist, and her 18-minute segment with Robinson wasn&amp;#039;t an interview -- it was an attempted hatchet job that failed because the target was smarter than the host. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/mdake/2010/10/12/maddow-cant-take-criticism-during-interview-with-republican-candidate/#IDComment103942235</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Maddow Can&#039;t Take Criticism During Interview with Republican Candidate</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/mdake/2010/10/12/maddow-cant-take-criticism-during-interview-with-republican-candidate/#IDComment103824269</link>
<description>I love the part where Maddow begins to look gleeful at the notion that she&amp;#039;s about to corner him with his own words. Then he calmly and expertly crushes her amateurish exuberance by stating that the subject was very lengthy and technical, that he wrote it 15 years ago, that he doesn&amp;#039;t have it in front of him, and that he doesn&amp;#039;t trust her characterization of his works.  Maddow is reduced to sounding like a back-row class clown, making snarky comments whenever the professor takes a breath.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/mdake/2010/10/12/maddow-cant-take-criticism-during-interview-with-republican-candidate/#IDComment103824269</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>