<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/656294</link>
		<description>Comments by Marcum</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40643664</link>
<description>This article lies by pruposeful omission.  Look at actual poll results and remove the &amp;quot;no opinions&amp;quot; it shows the following:  Warming caused by human activity 38% Warming NOT happening or happening, but NOT due to humans -- 62%  Put more simply for you math lightweights:  for every 5 who believe in agw, there are 8 who do not.  This article makes it seem like 57% believe in agw.  That&amp;#039;s a lie -- the poll does not say that.  It says a minority believe in agw while a solid 60+% don&amp;#039;t believe in that malarkey.  If you add in &amp;quot;no opinion&amp;quot; -- only 36% believe in agw, meaning 64% don&amp;#039;t.  The first lied about the science to get ahead in the numbers, but as people have discovered the lies, the numbers have gone down.  So no that they are behind in the numbers they lie about both the science and the numbers.  This lying thing is going to have go on for awhile -- till the UN (also known as hell) freezes over, I suppose. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40643664</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : We Will March on Washington</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mkibbe/2009/09/12/we-will-march-on-washington/#IDComment34131065</link>
<description>Let&amp;#039;s demand full attention to our agenda before anything else:   Jobs  GDP growth  Fiscal stability   Congress, Barak -- we the people, your employers (not your subjects) order you to adjust your priorities to address the issues noted above before distracting us with a false health care priority </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mkibbe/2009/09/12/we-will-march-on-washington/#IDComment34131065</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : We Will March on Washington</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mkibbe/2009/09/12/we-will-march-on-washington/#IDComment34131005</link>
<description>Health care ideas and reforms can be studied and debated in the interim, and legislation can be actively pursued in chamber after these other priorities have received sufficient time and attention and these goals have been achieved.   To do anything other than this is economic suicide and will make health care reform meaningless. Joblessness kills. The greatest source of bankruptcy is not health care but joblessness.  This is what we the people want and our employees in Washington need to start paying attention to our needs or they are going to have to be summarily fired.  Let&amp;#039;s demand full attention to our agenda before anything else:  Jobs GDP growth Fiscal stability  Congress, Barak -- we the people, your employers (not your subjects) order you to adjust your priorities to address the issues noted above before distracting us with a false health care priority  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mkibbe/2009/09/12/we-will-march-on-washington/#IDComment34131005</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : We Will March on Washington</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mkibbe/2009/09/12/we-will-march-on-washington/#IDComment34131000</link>
<description>The overall agenda needs to be re-seized.   The real crisis is as follows:  Jobs The overall economy - GDP growth Fiscal stability  We need for Congress to spend time on our priorities as noted. Until these are addressed, we should not spend much time on health care.  I would suggest no healthcare legislation gets considered until:  Unemployment is below 7% GDP growth is steady at 2.5% annually The annual deficit is reduced to less than 5% of GDP  This also means recasting the unspent stimulus dollars toward something effective in creating long-term value, like nuclear power plants.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mkibbe/2009/09/12/we-will-march-on-washington/#IDComment34131000</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>