<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/673987</link>
		<description>Comments by Manzabar</description>
<item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Pro-marriage group to push constitutional vote</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2009/12/22/pro-marriage-group-to-push-constitutional-vote#IDComment48802252</link>
<description>Are you against interracial marriage too then? As you&amp;#039;re using the same arguments that were used in supporting the miscegenation laws to attack gay marriage, I have to wonder... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2009/12/22/pro-marriage-group-to-push-constitutional-vote#IDComment48802252</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Pro-marriage group to push constitutional vote</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2009/12/22/pro-marriage-group-to-push-constitutional-vote#IDComment48643345</link>
<description>The title on this article is misleading. If they were really pro-marriage; they would be supporting more marriages, not trying to ban them. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2009/12/22/pro-marriage-group-to-push-constitutional-vote#IDComment48643345</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>