<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/671417</link>
		<description>Comments by LoudanBellicose</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Fort hood shooter paralyzed from the neck down </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/23/fort-hood-shooter-paralyzed-from-the-neck-down/#IDComment44510843</link>
<description>Execution should be by force feeding him to death. Bacon washed down with beer comes to mind. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/23/fort-hood-shooter-paralyzed-from-the-neck-down/#IDComment44510843</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Where will P.E.I. Muslims go to pray?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/12/where-will-p-e-i-muslims-go-to-pray/#IDComment43125337</link>
<description>I for one resent that churches etc. are tax exempt. Whenever someone is tax exempt that means that the rest of us are paying their share! Why should I pay for something that I don&amp;#039;t believe in? It is time to start debating the whole freedom of religion thing! Why should the secular pay for the superstitious, irrational,  hate mongering, ignorant, racists? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/12/where-will-p-e-i-muslims-go-to-pray/#IDComment43125337</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Are we really soft on crime?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment43027270</link>
<description>﻿  IntenseDebate Notification            &amp;lt;DIV&amp;gt;All crime stats are per 100,000   population.&amp;lt;/DIV&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;DIV&amp;gt;You must be a Liberal!&amp;lt;/DIV&amp;gt;      &amp;lt;DIV style=\&quot;FONT: 10pt arial\&quot;&amp;gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment43027270</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Are we really soft on crime?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment43027123</link>
<description>﻿  IntenseDebate Notification            &amp;lt;DIV&amp;gt;So you suggest that we should let people out   because jail is expensive?&amp;lt;/DIV&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;DIV&amp;gt;You must be a Liberal!&amp;lt;/DIV&amp;gt;      &amp;lt;DIV style=\&quot;FONT: 10pt arial\&quot;&amp;gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment43027123</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Are we really soft on crime?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment43027044</link>
<description>﻿  IntenseDebate Notification            &amp;lt;DIV&amp;gt;When you ask people if they have ever reported a   crime or been a victim. It is not hard.&amp;lt;/DIV&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;DIV&amp;gt;You must be a Liberal!&amp;lt;/DIV&amp;gt;      &amp;lt;DIV style=\&quot;FONT: 10pt arial\&quot;&amp;gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment43027044</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Are we really soft on crime?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment42813684</link>
<description>Violent crime is up 321% above what it was in 1962. Property crime is up 62% above what it was in 1962. The overall crime rate is up 137% above what it was in 1962. Fewer Canadians report crimes, only 34% of victims reported crime in 2004 compared to 37% in 1999. The reported crime rate excludes federal drug offenses. There is more I could go on and on. Clearly the soft on crime approach only benefits CRIMINALS, LAWYERS AND JUDGES. See my post above fot the solution. Tell your MP and PM. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment42813684</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Are we really soft on crime?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment42769190</link>
<description>Recidivism the Facts. As reported by: The US Bureau of Justice Statistics. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. The older the prisoner the lower the rate of recidivism. Keep them in jail until they are old. Prisoners that served more than five years had a lower rate of recidivism. Make them serve long terms. The more extensive the record of the convict the higher the rate of recidivism. Put them in jail sooner not later. A politically incorrect fact: Blacks and Hispanics had a higher rate of recidivism. Last but not least, everything that the Lefty/Liberals tell you is BS.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/09/are-we-really-soft-on-crime/#IDComment42769190</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Change slams Alberta </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/05/change-slams-alberta/#IDComment42141598</link>
<description>A majority is for WAP to loose. If they are too radical they will loose. If they touch Healthcare and approach American style Medicine they will loose. Stelmach is finished he will resign on November 9, 2009. Healthcare is the NO. 1 SACRED COW. The No. 2 Sacred Cow is Royalties. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/05/change-slams-alberta/#IDComment42141598</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Tamil Tigers coming to Canada</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/04/tamil-tigers-coming-to-canada/#IDComment42117225</link>
<description>One would hope that the Conservatives noticed that, when they announced a crackdown on refugees from Mexico and the Czech Republic, their rating in the polls increased dramatically. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/11/04/tamil-tigers-coming-to-canada/#IDComment42117225</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Gullible eager-beaver planet savers</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/gullible-eager-beaver-planet-savers/#IDComment41468770</link>
<description>I am not saying that we are not having Global Warming/Climate Change etc., what I am saying is that it is irrelevant, if the real cause is not addressed. The thing that gets me about all the environment/global heating/ climate change nuts, is that they completely ignore the cause, too many people. Just how do you propose to reduce emissions, etc., if we keep on reproducing at the rate we are now reproducing? All your fancy plans, are just so much BS, if the world population hits 9,000,000,000 people OR HIGHER. PS. I am right, you are wrong. ONE WONDERS IF THERE IS SOME OTHER AGENDA?    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 02:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/29/gullible-eager-beaver-planet-savers/#IDComment41468770</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Bringing albino-killers to justice</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/15/bringing-albino-killers-to-justice/#IDComment41465327</link>
<description>It seems like the Killers are racist. I mean killing people because of their color! Africans have a long way to go before they will be considered as civilized. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/15/bringing-albino-killers-to-justice/#IDComment41465327</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Parity party</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/30/the-loonie-requires-urgent-inaction/#IDComment41465028</link>
<description>It would be of great benefit to both Canada and the US if the two countries were to us use the same currency. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/30/the-loonie-requires-urgent-inaction/#IDComment41465028</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Canada&#039;s terrorist &quot;folk heroes&quot;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/30/canadas-terrorist-folk-heroes/#IDComment41464387</link>
<description>Terrorism as conducted by Islamic terrorist can hardly by compared to French resistance fighters. Resistance fighter usually target illegal occupiers. Like the Nazi. One can hardly credit Islamic Terrorist as targeting illegal occupiers in Canada. Killing innocents or trying to kill innocents is as heinous a crime, as treason and should be treated the same. The death penalty comes to mind.  You people that excuse terrorists are sick twisted imbeciles and could also be considered as traitors to Canada.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/30/canadas-terrorist-folk-heroes/#IDComment41464387</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The case for the seeing-eye horse</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/the-case-for-the-seeing-eye-horse/#IDComment36875957</link>
<description>I urge Steyn to keep up the good work. The funny thing is I am coming to the conclusion that the HRC are racist! Every single case that they have tried should be revieved. It seem to me that some heads have to roll. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/10/01/the-case-for-the-seeing-eye-horse/#IDComment36875957</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Harper must act now to protect free speech</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/20/harper-must-act-now-to-protect-free-speech/#IDComment36271111</link>
<description>One must commend Maclean&amp;#039;s, Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant for exposing this fraud on the Canadian people. I would also hope that the writers keep pursuing this outrage until someone goes to jail. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/20/harper-must-act-now-to-protect-free-speech/#IDComment36271111</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>