en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/656866 Comments by LivingDebtFree http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/05/l-a-times-criticizes-big-hollywood-with-everything-but-facts/#IDComment42220651 Ditto. Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:37:53 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/05/l-a-times-criticizes-big-hollywood-with-everything-but-facts/#IDComment42220651 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/05/l-a-times-criticizes-big-hollywood-with-everything-but-facts/#IDComment42125121 Second on that. Look at Roman Polanski. Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:33:40 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/05/l-a-times-criticizes-big-hollywood-with-everything-but-facts/#IDComment42125121 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/05/l-a-times-criticizes-big-hollywood-with-everything-but-facts/#IDComment42124633 He isn't going to be shown. Another movie like this one was made and people talk to the camera as if it was Mohammed. Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:30:23 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/05/l-a-times-criticizes-big-hollywood-with-everything-but-facts/#IDComment42124633 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/05/l-a-times-criticizes-big-hollywood-with-everything-but-facts/#IDComment42123850 Same reason you can't debate the "intellectual's intellectual" Al Gore. Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:23:38 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/05/l-a-times-criticizes-big-hollywood-with-everything-but-facts/#IDComment42123850 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41775425 I answered honestly and got no response to my posts. Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:13:11 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41775425 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41692789 So, in conclusion, without repeating Radio Host comments, that is my idea. I agree with a lot of what you say, but come to a totally different conclusion. It took me a while to write all of this out. I it is enjoyed for serious thought and discussion. Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:04:45 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41692789 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41692531 4. That is because of not enough competition in the market. Most people are underinsured not because they can't get more coverage, but because they don't know that they should. That is how my car insurance used to be until I had an insurance agent solicit me for business. He explained how he could get me more and better car insurance for less. Its amazing how that can be done when insurance isn't tied to the place you work. NEITHER plan would allow us to get insurance outside of a work plan. I take that back. The Democrat plan would, but I don't want to be tied to the government either. 5. If we had proper competition (and once again, adding a single government plan to the market doesn't significantly increase competition) then those companies would go out of business because people wouldn't buy insurance from them. 6. If we had proper competition, then we wouldn't have to subsidize them. A market would be out there to get their business. I believe that is how Wal-mart started... Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:04:21 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41692531 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41692483 A few minor clarifications: 1. 50%+ aren't DUE to health care bills, but health care bills do play a factor along with credit card debt, spending beyond their means and several other factors. In the Harvard study that this statistic is cited from, medical bills over $1,000 (not paid by the insurance company) over a 2 year period were included. 2. Absolutely. I used to be in that statistic. I had the money. I didn't spend it on health care. But beyond this, it looks like the proposed republican bill is aimed to help those 25 million rather than trying to overhaul a system for 600 million people. 3. I'm in 100% agreement there as well. I find it as more of a matter of education though. Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:03:59 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41692483 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/09/25/new-white-house-guidelines-are-pathetic-revisionist-history/#IDComment35898793 Mr. Shapiro, I would love to see a funny piece on all the times that Obama has used the phrase "teaching moment". I sure wish he learned before coming onto the job. Teaching moment means he is learning how bad he is at getting caught. Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:52:42 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/09/25/new-white-house-guidelines-are-pathetic-revisionist-history/#IDComment35898793 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/09/24/response-to-nea-chairmans-statement-throwing-yosi-sergant-under-the-bus-isnt-an-answer/#IDComment35793884 They didn't even throw him under the bus. They "transferred" him to another position. One in which they won't say what he is doing. Sounds like he is getting a free ride and they are trying to make it "appear" that they are doing something. Everybody heard on the tape that they admitted themselves that they were braking the law. Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:22:20 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/09/24/response-to-nea-chairmans-statement-throwing-yosi-sergant-under-the-bus-isnt-an-answer/#IDComment35793884 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/abaldwin/2009/09/24/nea-call-not-meant-to-promote-any-legislative-agenda/#IDComment35784357 There is nobody behind the curtain. Do not look behind the curtain. Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:54:38 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/abaldwin/2009/09/24/nea-call-not-meant-to-promote-any-legislative-agenda/#IDComment35784357 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/09/22/ace-of-spades-why-was-pr-firm-responsible-for-palin-hit-job-videos-on-nea-conf-call/#IDComment35597565 Seriously? Your reply is to talk about another topic and assume that I felt that it was okay? Please don't assume and please be relevant. Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:29:45 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/09/22/ace-of-spades-why-was-pr-firm-responsible-for-palin-hit-job-videos-on-nea-conf-call/#IDComment35597565 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/09/22/at-least-6-federal-laws-and-regulations-violated-by-the-nea-conference-call/#IDComment35528798 Ok, now this post isn't about Obama being Hitler or Stalin so all you lefties can stop right now if you are going to cry foul and all you right wing "nutjobs" please don't jump on a raging emotion filled monologue on how Obama is the antichrist. All that does is cause diversion from the truth. But the truth is, this is the same kind of abuses and manipulations that Hitler, Mussoline and Lenin used to come into power. They all got away with it because people were afraid to speak out about it until it was too late. There were clear violations of laws that were already in place, but because those that were in power were the ones committing the acts, nothing was done. Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:58:14 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/09/22/at-least-6-federal-laws-and-regulations-violated-by-the-nea-conference-call/#IDComment35528798 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/09/22/ace-of-spades-why-was-pr-firm-responsible-for-palin-hit-job-videos-on-nea-conf-call/#IDComment35520923 This is so rediculous. Any they are sending out a "memo" with training. They admitted on the conference call that they were crossing lines they shouldn't be during the Q&A period. I can't wait till my next vote. Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:33:01 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/09/22/ace-of-spades-why-was-pr-firm-responsible-for-palin-hit-job-videos-on-nea-conf-call/#IDComment35520923 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/09/22/barack-obama-on-letterman/#IDComment35493664 You racist. I saw you call Obama "boy". (please note sarcasm) Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:03:53 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/09/22/barack-obama-on-letterman/#IDComment35493664 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/09/21/demand-congressional-investigation-nea-conference-call-broke-laws/#IDComment35324232 This doesn't help at all. You sound like a radical left winger that only spouts opinions with no facts. Read the article on how the left thinks. (HINT: it all has to do with emotions) Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:03:03 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/09/21/demand-congressional-investigation-nea-conference-call-broke-laws/#IDComment35324232 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/09/21/demand-congressional-investigation-nea-conference-call-broke-laws/#IDComment35320082 When the government is in charge of policing itself, what will the outcome be? Kind of like Arthur Andersen? Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:37:09 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/09/21/demand-congressional-investigation-nea-conference-call-broke-laws/#IDComment35320082 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/09/21/propaganda-health-care-and-acorn-full-context-of-nea-conference-call-reveals-disturbing-pattern/#IDComment35312551 Shame on CNS for taking part in something like this. This is the parent agency for Americorps. To actively take an organization like this and use it as a political arm is beyond outrageous to me. As a former Peace Corps volunteer, I am glad that although Peace Corps members are openly opinionated about matters, the organization isn't actively involved in politics. That is the reason Peace Corps is so well known and well respected around the world. Americorps just seems to have problem after problem. Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:20:02 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/09/21/propaganda-health-care-and-acorn-full-context-of-nea-conference-call-reveals-disturbing-pattern/#IDComment35312551 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/09/21/propaganda-health-care-and-acorn-full-context-of-nea-conference-call-reveals-disturbing-pattern/#IDComment35312190 So, then, is there a debate at all as to the illegality of this? Will a senate hearing be started? Those were two legitimate questions that I would like to hear from other people about because as far as I can tell, it is black and white that this is illegal (we already know that it is 100% unethical and so do the participants in the conference call). Finally, if this was illegal, but nothing is done about it in the goernment, then what do we take of these new (and some old) government organizations and websites? Although it is illegal, will hackers log up and destroy serve.gov like they have been known to do with other entities in the past? Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:15:36 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/09/21/propaganda-health-care-and-acorn-full-context-of-nea-conference-call-reveals-disturbing-pattern/#IDComment35312190 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ARFH9O0#IDComment35249503 He sounds like everybody else that is supporting them... don't know much about it... haven't paid attention... should be an investigation of some sort (only after it has built up over weeks and there is no other alternative)... moral obligation... Seriously? I should think is sincere why? Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:08:21 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ARFH9O0#IDComment35249503