<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1167749</link>
		<description>Comments by Landry_Clark</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Review: &#039;Larry Crowne&#039; Provides Holiday Weekend Fun</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2011/07/02/review-larry-crowne-provides-holiday-weekend-fun/#IDComment169211473</link>
<description>Oh, it&amp;#039;s a suckerpunch. Hanlon, God love him, neglects to go into detail about Crowne&amp;#039;s firing, which is wrought with liberal elite condescension and is, therefore completely laughable in all the wrong ways.  SPOILER ALERT THAT&amp;#039;S ACTUALLY IN SEVERAL REVIEWS I&amp;#039;VE READ.  The store he works at is called UMart, as Hanlon discloses.  It&amp;#039;s obviously Wal-Mart, and we can tell that they treat their employees like flaming bags of crap.  The break room is a couch in the store room -- which rings totally false. I&amp;#039;ve worked retail. And it sucks horribly. But we had breakrooms. With, like, TV&amp;#039;s. And soda machines and bad coffee. It&amp;#039;s clear that most of the employees hate it at UMart. But not the irrepressible Larry Crowne, goshdarnit. He loves it. Lives for it.   So, they fire him because they say that without a college degree he&amp;#039;s unpromotable. Which makes. No sense.   They justify the ridiculous policy by saying that they can&amp;#039;t offer him anything more, and they don&amp;#039;t believe in standing in the way of his career advancement...he&amp;#039;s hit a ceiling.   in reality, Wal-Mart -- er, UMart -- would love an employee like Crowne, who&amp;#039;s good for morale and is unpromotable. And that&amp;#039;s assuming that Wal-Mart -- dammit! UMart -- would even have such a policy.   I find it very hard to believe that such a policy would exist at a place like UMart. I worked retail, where I often reported to people without degrees. It&amp;#039;s a bogus, bullcrap excuse to get the character fired and throw a suckerpunch while they&amp;#039;re at it.   Mildly diverting movie. Roberts is good, her character is interesting. Hanks&amp;#039; Crowne is just dull and too absurdly likable. He has very little arc to speak of. The story gains some steam by virtue of the likable characters, and Roberts&amp;#039; storyline, but this is the type of movie that you skip now. Skip on DVD. Skip on cable.   Then, in ten years, maybe you&amp;#039;ll accidentally catch it on TBS, and you&amp;#039;ll be pleasantly surprised at best.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2011/07/02/review-larry-crowne-provides-holiday-weekend-fun/#IDComment169211473</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Shoulda&#039; Won Best Picture of 1986</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/11/20/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-of-1986/#IDComment110911389</link>
<description>Dismissive is the correct word, and exactly what I was going for.  It&amp;#039;s a joke that only I would get, but it seemed funny to me to be dismissive about a movie like Platoon, which, even though I&amp;#039;m not the biggest fan, did in fact change the face of the Vietnam War movie. Like it or not, it is not the kind of movie one would normally ho-hum, or, dismiss. So I did.  Hey --  I never said I wasn&amp;#039;t a snarky jerk.    </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/11/20/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-of-1986/#IDComment110911389</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Shoulda&#039; Won Best Picture of 1986</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/11/20/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-of-1986/#IDComment110903888</link>
<description>I just realized that, too.  What happened was I saw the title on the IMDB page, and instantly dozed off for a good five hours. By the time I woke up, I continued with the column and forgot to go back and fix it.  Cam </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/11/20/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-of-1986/#IDComment110903888</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Shoulda&#039; Won Best Picture of 1986</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/11/20/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-of-1986/#IDComment110901967</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t dislike Platoon, nor do I claim to in the post.  There are scenes that I like, the performances are uniformly good-to-kinda-great, the soundtrack is pretty awesome, and the moments of bonding between the soldiers are quite moving.  I blew it off, as you say, because in my opinion (maybe one not as valid as yours) when the axe a filmmaker has to grind becomes larger than the story he&amp;#039;s trying to tell, the movie suffers. The sparks from Stone&amp;#039;s axe are in nearly every frame of the movie.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/11/20/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-of-1986/#IDComment110901967</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Shoulda&#039; Won Best Picture of 1986</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/11/20/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-of-1986/#IDComment110901131</link>
<description>That was pretty moronic. My bad. Aliens should have merited a mention, and could even bump one of the other four of my &amp;quot;nominees&amp;quot; on any arbitrary day.   Thanks for pointing out my grievous error.   Cam </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/11/20/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-of-1986/#IDComment110901131</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Shoulda&#039; Won the 1983 Best Picture Oscar?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/10/10/what-shoulda-won-the-1983-best-picture-oscar/#IDComment103579113</link>
<description>It was a great year, no doubt. This whole series is about the oscars, year by year. And when I look at this list I&amp;#039;m reminded more and more that the 1994 series was a misfire. Thanks for rubbing it in, lol. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/10/10/what-shoulda-won-the-1983-best-picture-oscar/#IDComment103579113</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Shoulda&#039; Won the 1983 Best Picture Oscar?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/10/10/what-shoulda-won-the-1983-best-picture-oscar/#IDComment103388583</link>
<description>Nice list and I actually cut out a mention of Mr. Mom, just to cut down word count. But agree to disagree on Terms. I can&amp;#039;t pass it up when I flip past it. Cam </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 03:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/10/10/what-shoulda-won-the-1983-best-picture-oscar/#IDComment103388583</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Roger Ebert: Hyperbole Much? Hypocrisy Much?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/09/09/roger-ebert-hyperbole-much-hypocrisy-much/#IDComment97906849</link>
<description>Honestly, you are probably that it&amp;#039;s too much. My disdain for critics would have gone unmentionted forever had not the most recognizable one on the planet not ventured into political commentary after scolding Medved for doing the same. His commentary reveals even more his desperation for validation the lib elite, so I vented, then submitted, and Nolte posted.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/09/09/roger-ebert-hyperbole-much-hypocrisy-much/#IDComment97906849</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Critics’ Favorite 80’s Film: &#039;Raging Bull&#039; </title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/eazlant/2010/08/29/the-critics-favorite-80s-film-raging-bull/#IDComment95838493</link>
<description>You botha me &amp;#039;bout a steak?! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/eazlant/2010/08/29/the-critics-favorite-80s-film-raging-bull/#IDComment95838493</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Maybe 1994 Wasn&#039;t the Best Movie Year Ever</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95775494</link>
<description>&amp;lt;sigh&amp;gt; My bad, dude. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95775494</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Maybe 1994 Wasn&#039;t the Best Movie Year Ever</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95775426</link>
<description>That was a great year. Remember my mama dropping me off at the theatre in the morning at picking me up at dark on many a Saturday that year. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95775426</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Maybe 1994 Wasn&#039;t the Best Movie Year Ever</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95735516</link>
<description>And yours is to misinterpret things you have read and make absurd assumptions about things you haven&amp;#039;t. My bad on the lighten up remark. I myself misinterpreted your post and assumed you were taking my column seriously, which I would never urge. I realize now there&amp;#039;s a deeper pathology behind your comments. Good luck with that, dude. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95735516</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Maybe 1994 Wasn&#039;t the Best Movie Year Ever</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95722837</link>
<description>Lighten up, Francis. I&amp;#039;ve been pretty honest that the best year ever tag was part nostolgia and part hyperbolic from the start.  You had obviously already ignored my writing or you&amp;#039;d have gotten that. It&amp;#039;s a goof, a way to spark fun talk about our opinions on movies. Awesome that you took it all as a way to judge me as an honest foor or a lying attention hound. Cam </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95722837</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Maybe 1994 Wasn&#039;t the Best Movie Year Ever</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95718057</link>
<description>Need to like I&amp;#039;ll die if I don&amp;#039;t? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/28/maybe-1994-wasnt-the-best-movie-year-ever/#IDComment95718057</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : The Rise of Kevin Spacey: A Look Back at 1994 - Best Year Ever!</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/01/the-rise-of-spacey-a-look-back-at-1994-best-year-ever/#IDComment90193406</link>
<description>I actually almost wrote about reality bites this week. That movie embarrasses me. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/08/01/the-rise-of-spacey-a-look-back-at-1994-best-year-ever/#IDComment90193406</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Flashback: Milton Friedman Schools a Young Michael Moore</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/07/19/milton-friedman-schools-a-young-michael-moore/#IDComment87611557</link>
<description>He does, however, use his middle finger to gesture as one would normally do with the index. You know, like that waitress did to Costanza that one time. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 03:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2010/07/19/milton-friedman-schools-a-young-michael-moore/#IDComment87611557</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Natural Born Killers&#039;: A Look Back at 1994 -- Most Sensational Year Ever!</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/07/10/natural-born-killers-a-look-back-at-1994-most-sensational-year-ever/#IDComment86203574</link>
<description>I appreciate your opinion.  Serially, do, even if we don&amp;#039;t aggree.  Cam </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/07/10/natural-born-killers-a-look-back-at-1994-most-sensational-year-ever/#IDComment86203574</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Natural Born Killers&#039;: A Look Back at 1994 -- Most Sensational Year Ever!</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/07/10/natural-born-killers-a-look-back-at-1994-most-sensational-year-ever/#IDComment86203244</link>
<description>I am not writing about the movies of 1994 in any particular order. It&amp;#039;s mostly random. I picked a Stone movie b/c of his chavez movie. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/07/10/natural-born-killers-a-look-back-at-1994-most-sensational-year-ever/#IDComment86203244</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Speed:&#039; A Look Back at 1994: Bestest Year Ever!</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/06/19/speed-a-look-back-at-1994-bestest-year-ever/#IDComment81118428</link>
<description>Thank you for posting this.  I absolutely stand corrected and would love to be able to amend the column now that I know this.  I never meant to deny someone credit for their work.  Cam </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/06/19/speed-a-look-back-at-1994-bestest-year-ever/#IDComment81118428</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Speed:&#039; A Look Back at 1994: Bestest Year Ever!</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/06/19/speed-a-look-back-at-1994-bestest-year-ever/#IDComment81011992</link>
<description>The script I read for the film some years ago had Joss Wedon credited with some revisions.  It was my understanding that the story, structure, and characters are all Yost. Some dialogue is Wedon.  But I could be wrong, of course.  Cam </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 00:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2010/06/19/speed-a-look-back-at-1994-bestest-year-ever/#IDComment81011992</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>