en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/267408 Comments by LanceKant http://defensetech.org/2012/08/03/mda-stop-watching-porn-at-work/#IDComment414325115 I had to read this twice to understand what you were saying. Fri, 3 Aug 2012 05:37:16 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2012/08/03/mda-stop-watching-porn-at-work/#IDComment414325115 http://defensetech.org/2012/06/04/air-sea-battle-and-our-buildup-in-the-pacific/#IDComment375192965 Dude, Chinese gamers are not the most informed when it comes to the country's long term plans. China will not help North Korea in a present day war. In the case of a war that North Korea cannot win (basically any case), they'd likely invade North Korea itself to take what they can rather than let us take the whole thing. Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:20:20 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2012/06/04/air-sea-battle-and-our-buildup-in-the-pacific/#IDComment375192965 http://defensetech.org/2012/06/04/air-sea-battle-and-our-buildup-in-the-pacific/#IDComment374266625 Remember that China has a higher chance of attacking American allies rather than US forces directly. Dispersal bases allow for quick response and assistance to our allies. Also, nuclear deterrence is already in place on both sides. China has a good number of nukes and even though the US has around ten times more ICBMs than the PRC, it's enough to deter any nuclear attack from both sides. You're stating that if, say, the USSR hypothetically hit a carrier with an non-nuclear ICBM in the Cold War, the best response would be to hit back on civilian populations with a nuclear ICBM and hope they don't hit our civilian centers in kind? That kinda undermines the whole purpose of strategic deterrence. Tue, 5 Jun 2012 04:51:05 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2012/06/04/air-sea-battle-and-our-buildup-in-the-pacific/#IDComment374266625 http://defensetech.org/2012/05/04/f-22-pilots-to-discuss-why-they-wont-fly-the-jet/#IDComment354102081 The other guy didn't think he should respect the commander-in-chief as an active duty soldier. This is different. Fri, 4 May 2012 16:55:01 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2012/05/04/f-22-pilots-to-discuss-why-they-wont-fly-the-jet/#IDComment354102081 http://defensetech.org/2012/04/02/chinas-second-j-20-stealth-fighter/#IDComment330053142 I like that, Popaganda. Mon, 2 Apr 2012 15:54:27 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2012/04/02/chinas-second-j-20-stealth-fighter/#IDComment330053142 http://defensetech.org/2012/01/23/monday-morning-video-tanks-on-a-train/#IDComment272226763 The YouTube comments on these videos make my brain hurt. Apparently everyone's either convinced we're going to war ("ww3", "get ready america"), or that the government's going to crack down on us ("have fun with obamas regime", "look at fema preparing"). Also, don't forget the die-hard Ron Paul supporters ("RP2012") who believe he's the only chance of preventing the previous two scenarios. Ironically, he supports domestic military buildup, and a routine redeployment like this is something he'd prefer than an overseas airlift. Not that I'm advocating him (his fans turn me off). Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:35:38 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2012/01/23/monday-morning-video-tanks-on-a-train/#IDComment272226763 http://defensetech.org/2011/12/29/china-launches-its-own-gps-satellites/#IDComment250861599 Hate to burst your bubble, but Reagan's policies were fine for the Cold War world, not now, when our biggest military rival also happens to be our biggest economic counterpart. Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:06:33 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/12/29/china-launches-its-own-gps-satellites/#IDComment250861599 http://defensetech.org/2011/12/02/chinas-carrier-seen-from-an-airliner/#IDComment231983786 Probably on your lame joke. Sat, 3 Dec 2011 04:57:17 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/12/02/chinas-carrier-seen-from-an-airliner/#IDComment231983786 http://defensetech.org/2011/11/02/chinas-carrier-gets-a-new-paint-job/#IDComment216024610 How awesome of you to evaluate a newly refurbished aircraft carrier based on looks! The CIA should hire you, because you seem to be able to tell whether something's good or not by just looking at lo-res pictures of it! Wed, 2 Nov 2011 23:49:55 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/11/02/chinas-carrier-gets-a-new-paint-job/#IDComment216024610 http://defensetech.org/2011/10/20/nato-airstrike-may-have-hit-gadhafis-convoy/#IDComment210123914 Bort, you should be surprised that NATO didn't kill Gadhafi in the months since the UN resolution. Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:40:29 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/10/20/nato-airstrike-may-have-hit-gadhafis-convoy/#IDComment210123914 http://defensetech.org/2011/09/16/senate-appropriatiors-keep-jsf-production-levels-flat/#IDComment194142801 Epic senator indeed. Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:08:52 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/09/16/senate-appropriatiors-keep-jsf-production-levels-flat/#IDComment194142801 http://defensetech.org/2011/09/15/lockheeds-new-stol-airlifter-design/#IDComment194119457 Sorry, that just looks a bit unpractical and... stupid. Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:48:49 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/09/15/lockheeds-new-stol-airlifter-design/#IDComment194119457 http://defensetech.org/2011/09/09/the-u-s-post-911-weapons-tech/#IDComment191570390 Another mention could be post-9/11 digital camouflage. Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:13:41 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/09/09/the-u-s-post-911-weapons-tech/#IDComment191570390 http://defensetech.org/2011/08/29/chinas-starter-carrier/#IDComment187934552 Agreed. People dislike a middleman because there's nothing to argue about then. Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:56:37 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/08/29/chinas-starter-carrier/#IDComment187934552 http://defensetech.org/2011/08/24/f-16s-intercept-russian-bombers/#IDComment186189643 Wait, how did the Russians get all the way to Dutch airspace? Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:59:44 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/08/24/f-16s-intercept-russian-bombers/#IDComment186189643 http://defensetech.org/2011/08/04/2000-tomahawks-fired-in-anger/#IDComment180101608 Making a joke like that must make you feel so smart now, huh? Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:41:11 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/08/04/2000-tomahawks-fired-in-anger/#IDComment180101608 http://defensetech.org/2011/07/29/special-operators-holographic-maps/#IDComment178348077 I want this for Google Earth. Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:51:22 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/07/29/special-operators-holographic-maps/#IDComment178348077 http://defensetech.org/2011/07/27/was-the-plaaf-really-chasing-a-u-2/#IDComment177774212 So why did the PLAAF go after a routine US recon run if they knew it was, well, routine? Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:12:32 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/07/27/was-the-plaaf-really-chasing-a-u-2/#IDComment177774212 http://defensetech.org/2011/07/05/chinas-hale-drone-to-id-targets-for-carrier-killers/#IDComment170124082 Nice generalization bro. Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:52:02 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/07/05/chinas-hale-drone-to-id-targets-for-carrier-killers/#IDComment170124082 http://defensetech.org/2011/06/08/chinas-military-tech-20-years-behind-u-s/#IDComment160648077 Is the USAF in charge of cyberwarfare? Or does the FBI and/or CIA take command on attacks to America' cyber infrastructure? Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:45:42 +0000 http://defensetech.org/2011/06/08/chinas-military-tech-20-years-behind-u-s/#IDComment160648077