<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/512397</link>
		<description>Comments by LaidOffDiary</description>
<item>
<title>Law Shucks : Benefit</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/benefit/#IDComment26345516</link>
<description>can you grab me one of those ergonomic keyboards too? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Jul 2009 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/benefit/#IDComment26345516</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Cold Water, $1</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/cold-water-1/#IDComment26194840</link>
<description>there are too many laid off attorneys for you to really be worried that you&amp;#039;re blacklisted unless you did something outrageous...even then, it&amp;#039;s still questionable. Temp agencies, on the other hand, enjoy blacklisting people (I&amp;#039;ve blacklisted myself with Update Legal and it was fun doing it) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Jul 2009 05:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/cold-water-1/#IDComment26194840</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Gossip Columnist, Pirates, Superheroes and Scientologists</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/gossip-columnist-pirates-superheroes-and-scientologists/#IDComment26181979</link>
<description>yeah, I expected more. my best friend growing up named his cat after Logan/Wolverine. that was almost as blasphemous as the movie was to the original X-Men comics. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/07/gossip-columnist-pirates-superheroes-and-scientologists/#IDComment26181979</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Benefit</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/benefit/#IDComment26084270</link>
<description>that&amp;#039;s true, that&amp;#039;s why junior monkeys should milk BigLaw as much as they can, run up their expense account, sleep with summer associates, and raid the supplies closet. Got to get your giggles in some how if you&amp;#039;re not actually getting anything substantive while you&amp;#039;re sitting in a little room and trying to look busy even though you&amp;#039;re really just gchatting, hanging out on facebook, and reading the super duper informative Law Shucks blog and its super duper entertaining Laid Off Diary. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 02:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/benefit/#IDComment26084270</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Apple</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/apple/#IDComment24752893</link>
<description>oooh SNAP. that was very witty. I have been outwitted by a guy named &amp;quot;ZZP&amp;quot;. You sure showed me. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/apple/#IDComment24752893</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Apple</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/apple/#IDComment24752846</link>
<description>I think lawyers aren&amp;#039;t used to being honest...especially to themselves! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/apple/#IDComment24752846</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Apple</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/apple/#IDComment24752816</link>
<description>yes, no one says you can&amp;#039;t be both positive and angry! muchas gracias, senor! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/apple/#IDComment24752816</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Apple</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/apple/#IDComment24752752</link>
<description>I completely agree! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/apple/#IDComment24752752</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Reach out and touch...me</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/reach-out-and-touch-me/#IDComment24752717</link>
<description>thanks for taking the time to read my post AND compare and contrast it to another writer AND also to comment. I&amp;#039;m sure it was time well spent. I really appreciate your taking the time to do this during what I know must be an extremely busy day of billing (I mean, sticking gerbils up your ass). Besos! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/06/reach-out-and-touch-me/#IDComment24752717</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Stricter Standards Applied at Performance Reviews</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/stricter-standards-applied-at-performance-reviews/#IDComment19609784</link>
<description>Well, sure, if you don&amp;#039;t produce, you should get the boot... but if you do produce, you should at least have some job security--where in BigLaw you don&amp;#039;t. Also, BigLaw work distribution should ensure that it&amp;#039;s at least fair to all associates as this would cut down on backstabbing and unproductive competition. Some competition is good, but this squabbling that goes on at most BigLaw firms is not.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laidoffdiary.wordpress.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.laidoffdiary.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/stricter-standards-applied-at-performance-reviews/#IDComment19609784</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : Icahn Doesn\&#039;t Know CEO He\&#039;s Trying to Oust?</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/icahn-doesnt-know-ceo-hes-trying-to-oust/#IDComment19609692</link>
<description>I agree. You get some respect. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/icahn-doesnt-know-ceo-hes-trying-to-oust/#IDComment19609692</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : 10,000 Laid Off... and Counting</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/10000-laid-off-and-counting/#IDComment19398519</link>
<description>yes, there are plenty of TTTs that still have BigLaw jobs, so? that doesn&amp;#039;t mean that there are positions open or that firms are hiring. There are also plenty of Ivy kids or kids with better marks than me (and worse than me) who have been laid off (and were at more prestigious BigLaw firms).  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/10000-laid-off-and-counting/#IDComment19398519</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Law Shucks : 10,000 Laid Off... and Counting</title>
<link>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/10000-laid-off-and-counting/#IDComment19235424</link>
<description>I am so amazed that people are so amazed that lawyers are getting laid off. Are people stupid? Do they not understand if businesses aren&amp;#039;t doing any business, then there is no use for business/corporate attorneys? People also glaze over when I tell them I&amp;#039;m a corporate attorney. They still think I litigate but about corporations. How do these people still have jobs and I don&amp;#039;t?  Someone just posted on my blog that they didn&amp;#039;t understand how I couldn&amp;#039;t find a job having gone to a top law school and having been on law review. I don&amp;#039;t know, because there are 10k unemployed BigLaw attorneys who also went to a top law school and who were also on law review.... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://lawshucks.com/2009/04/10000-laid-off-and-counting/#IDComment19235424</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>