<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/571603</link>
		<description>Comments by KrazyJoe</description>
<item>
<title>/Film : Which Path Will Orci, Kurtzman and Lindelof Choose For Star Trek 2?</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/16/which-path-will-orci-kurtzman-and-lindelof-choose-for-star-trek-2/#IDComment24634611</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m a big disappointed that a usually reputable site like Slashfilm.com still hasn&amp;#039;t corrected this error. It&amp;#039;s Star Trek 12, not Star Trek 2. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/16/which-path-will-orci-kurtzman-and-lindelof-choose-for-star-trek-2/#IDComment24634611</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Spielberg Has &quot;Cracked the Story&quot; of Indiana Jones 5</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/16/spielberg-has-cracked-the-story-of-indiana-jones-5/#IDComment24607169</link>
<description>People who complain about Indy IV obviously aren&amp;#039;t fans of the first three films. Indy IV looked, felt like, tasted like and smelled like an Indiana Jones movie. it was Indiana Jones through and through. It&amp;#039;s not as good as Raiders and Crusade, but it&amp;#039;s a better film then Temple (still the weakest of the four)   Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was easily and without question the 2nd best film I saw in 08, after The Dark Knight.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/16/spielberg-has-cracked-the-story-of-indiana-jones-5/#IDComment24607169</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>