<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1488073</link>
		<description>Comments by Koshcat</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : White House Releases Obama&#039;s Long-form Birth Certificate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate/#IDComment146568228</link>
<description>I know you have trouble following this so I will type slow.  It has never been clarified what exactly a &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot; means, particularily with regard to eligibility for presidency.  There is a difference between citizen and natural born citizen.  Schwartzenegger is a citizen, but is clearly NOT eligible. Most of us had both parents born in US and we were born in the US, thus we are eligible.  But there are still a lot of grey areas in between.  If Jose and Maria slip across the border from Mexico and have a baby born in Las Vegas (an anchor baby) but they never become citizens nor go back to Mexico, is the baby qualified?  Based on your assertion no and I would agree.  What if Maria and Jose became citizens later denoucing their previous citizenship?  I think that is a slippery slope and would say no.  Baracks mom was but his father was not.  Qualified?  I don&amp;#039;t think so but others disagree. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate/#IDComment146568228</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : White House Releases Obama&#039;s Long-form Birth Certificate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate/#IDComment146545377</link>
<description>No coincidence on the time of this release and the timing of his book though, right? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate/#IDComment146545377</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : White House Releases Obama&#039;s Long-form Birth Certificate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate/#IDComment146528089</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t know the answer but I suspect Barack tried to game the systems to his advantage whenever possible.  That is why I suspect some of his school records have been sealed.  I suspect they show that he obtained either favorable admission or financial assistance due to his &amp;quot;status&amp;quot; whatever it was he was claiming. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate/#IDComment146528089</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : White House Releases Obama&#039;s Long-form Birth Certificate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate/#IDComment146528024</link>
<description>There are still two problems in regards to the birth certificate.  First, &amp;quot;African&amp;quot; is not a race nor was it an acceptable racial description in 1961.  It could have been a mistake but it makes one question the legitimacy of the document, that is it makes it feel like it has gone through the political correctness filter.  The other problem is the definition of &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen.&amp;quot;  Now I am not an expert and many of them disagree but the primary definition that I think most agree with is a person born within the republic to parents who don&amp;#039;t have allegience to any other sovereignty.  Does that mean that both parents need to be American citizens and denouce any other citizenships?  Obama&amp;#039;s father was Kenyan, which was at that time a British colony and thus had dual citizenship to both Kenya and Great Britain.  According to British law at the time, his son would also have the right to citizenship.  Based on his actions, though, Barack&amp;#039;s father was not a fan of Great Britain based on the treatment of his home country Kenya. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate/#IDComment146528024</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Bachmann Will Form Presidential Exploratory Committee</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/24/bachmann-will-form-presidential-exploratory-committee/#IDComment137313160</link>
<description>Just google Bachmann and twat and there are already several hits.  Works with b----- and c--- as well. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/24/bachmann-will-form-presidential-exploratory-committee/#IDComment137313160</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : He&#039;s Baaack! Olbermann&#039;s &quot;Worst Person&quot; Turns Up Online</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/03/23/hes-baaack-olbermanns-worst-person-turns-up-online/#IDComment137311508</link>
<description>Soooo, Olberman gets fired for breach of contract but Beck is the crazy one?  What would be awesome is if Beck set up a shadow company that hired Olberman back, without his knowing who is really paying the bills. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/03/23/hes-baaack-olbermanns-worst-person-turns-up-online/#IDComment137311508</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Why Should We Care What NOW Thinks of Bill Maher’s Sexist Palin Slur?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/lziganto/2011/03/24/why-should-we-care-what-now-thinks-of-bill-mahers-sexist-palin-slur/#IDComment137298604</link>
<description>I think with the word used here, the equilivant would be if he used the other N-word. And we all know he would have been dumped faster than the Aflac duck. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/lziganto/2011/03/24/why-should-we-care-what-now-thinks-of-bill-mahers-sexist-palin-slur/#IDComment137298604</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The White House Guess List: How Obama Pulled a Fast One on the American People - in the Name of &#039;Tra</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/03/22/the-white-house-guess-list-how-obama-pulled-a-fast-one-on-the-american-people-in-the-name-of-transparency/#IDComment137121520</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not sure I can take it another two years of all this transparency and accolades.  I hear Antarctica is nice this time of year. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/03/22/the-white-house-guess-list-how-obama-pulled-a-fast-one-on-the-american-people-in-the-name-of-transparency/#IDComment137121520</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : MSM Ignores Palin&#039;s Successful Israel Trip, When They&#039;re Not Digging Her for It </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/epokroy/2011/03/23/msm-ignores-palins-successful-israel-trip-when-theyre-not-digging-her-for-it/#IDComment137070333</link>
<description>Uh... no thank you to number one. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/epokroy/2011/03/23/msm-ignores-palins-successful-israel-trip-when-theyre-not-digging-her-for-it/#IDComment137070333</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Talking Points Memo Gives Crash Course in Bad Journalism</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2011/03/23/talking-points-memo-gives-crash-course-in-bad-journalism/#IDComment137067194</link>
<description>As for Palin, I question her electability and after watching her show obout Alaska, I think I would rather have Todd as president.  But it is way too early.  Remember, Hillary had the nomination in her back pocket and just needed to go through the motions.  I know I am playing the &amp;quot;what if...&amp;quot; game, but if the GOP would have put in a decent candidate and if the media would have even done a half-a$$ed job, Barry would have been blown out. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2011/03/23/talking-points-memo-gives-crash-course-in-bad-journalism/#IDComment137067194</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Talking Points Memo Gives Crash Course in Bad Journalism</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2011/03/23/talking-points-memo-gives-crash-course-in-bad-journalism/#IDComment137066311</link>
<description>Lee, I would like your opinion about journalism in general.  It seems to me that the basics of good journalism have either been forgotten or not taught anymore.  What happened to actually researching a story?  Calling those involved and getting a comment?  Getting to be the big man and writing the editorials used to be an honor-one that took time and hard work to get to.  Don&amp;#039;t these people know that we really don&amp;#039;t give a rip about their opinion?  I see this everywhere, not just with politics.  There was a story in the local paper regarding physicians getting paid by pharmaceutical companies as experts.  A physician company that I work for was named in the article as being complicit.  However, not one of the top 12 receivers of money in the state was from our company nor was anyone contacted by the reporter for comment.  A clear case of what Rush calls &amp;quot;drive-by media.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2011/03/23/talking-points-memo-gives-crash-course-in-bad-journalism/#IDComment137066311</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Will The Media Call Obama a Hypocrite?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/03/21/will-the-media-call-obama-a-hypocrite/#IDComment136492737</link>
<description>I supported the war in Iraq out of fear, rational or irrational.  After 9/11, I was concerned that between Saddam and al-Qaeda we were going to see WMD attacks in either our country or an ally (no, I really would not like to see France, Germany, Britain, or Australia or anyone else attacked).  He was a monster to his own people and a dangerous menance to everyone around him.  Libya is different and this is a huge mistake.  Bush took what about 3-6 months preparing the country for war.  I hear speaker Boehner found out we were attacking about an hour before it happened.  Well, Obama, you can&amp;#039;t blame Bush for this mess.  You have to convince Congress and the people what you are doing is appropriate and what the end game is.  I hope Congress has the courage to press hard. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/03/21/will-the-media-call-obama-a-hypocrite/#IDComment136492737</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : America Fights Europe’s War For Oil, Or How America Got Played by The Europeans Yet Again</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/cjohnson/2011/03/20/america-fights-europes-war-for-oil-or-how-america-got-played-by-the-europeans-yet-again/#IDComment136282483</link>
<description>What baffels me is how inconsistant military action is used and supported. Kosovo was supported by the left because it was a human rights issue and our troops would be out by Christmas 1996 (they are still there). Iraq was not supported because it was all about oil, even though thousands were being tortured, raped, and murdered by the regime. So is the war in Libya about human rights or about oil? Yes, we depend a lot on oil and throwing out a dictator who was destabilizing the region around him (Saddam) will be beneficial in the long run. This was supported by the Turks, Saudis, Kuwaitis, Israelis, and probably even the Jordanians. Libya is not the same. There is no clear goal or purpose. The Libyan economy is absolutely dependent upon oil. Wouldn&amp;#039;t economic sanctions have been better, but this time we actually keep an eye on the French and Russians and not let them break the embargo like they did in Iraq? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/cjohnson/2011/03/20/america-fights-europes-war-for-oil-or-how-america-got-played-by-the-europeans-yet-again/#IDComment136282483</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : The New Production Code: MGM Scrubs China From &#039;Red Dawn&#039; Remake</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/16/the-new-production-code-mgm-scrubs-china-from-red-dawn-remake/#IDComment135413449</link>
<description>The original Red Dawn had Russian and Cuban invaders.  The Chinese and the US became allies.  I think there is a line in the movie stating that the Chinese had already lost about 300 million people in the war.    Not going to see the movie because it started with a dumb concept and the studio made it worse.  Staight to DVD where it can be pirated.  A more realistic movie would to be attacked from the inside (in US, Europe, Russia,and China) by Muslims setting off a world war.  The Chinese, US, Russia, Australia, and parts of Europe join forces to destroy the fascist hoards. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/16/the-new-production-code-mgm-scrubs-china-from-red-dawn-remake/#IDComment135413449</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Debunking Annie Leonard on Citizens United</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/03/03/debunking-annie-leonard-on-citizens-united/#IDComment132240590</link>
<description>Please restrain yourself to just the topic at hand and take this to the open forum.  Besides, I cannot find the videa either so that means it doesn&amp;#039;t exist, right?  If it does, please share. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Mar 2011 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/03/03/debunking-annie-leonard-on-citizens-united/#IDComment132240590</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Montana Republicans to the Federal Government: &#039;Don&#039;t Tread on Me&#039;</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/awrhawkins/2011/02/28/montana-republicans-to-the-federal-government-dont-tread-on-me/#IDComment131448586</link>
<description>Didn&amp;#039;t know you were from Montana; I knew there was something right about you.  I grew up in Great Falls and went to MSU - GO BOBCATS!  My mother is a little harder on the Governor than you.  She is more than just not a fan.  Really doesn&amp;#039;t like his story of voter intimidation on an Indian reservation that he laughs about.  What a loser.  Take care and stay warm. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2011 01:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/awrhawkins/2011/02/28/montana-republicans-to-the-federal-government-dont-tread-on-me/#IDComment131448586</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : MSM Attempting to &quot;Breitbart&quot; for News</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/02/25/msm-attempting-to-breitbart-for-news/#IDComment130676897</link>
<description>The same place where the alien Xfrdhend from planet Stylean is meeting Soros to finalize their plans to take over the world.  Making s**t up about nobodies without proof or context is fun! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/02/25/msm-attempting-to-breitbart-for-news/#IDComment130676897</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : MSM Attempting to &quot;Breitbart&quot; for News</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/02/25/msm-attempting-to-breitbart-for-news/#IDComment130675915</link>
<description>Who? What? Who cares? Seriously, Rudy is nobody and going no where. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/02/25/msm-attempting-to-breitbart-for-news/#IDComment130675915</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace :  Marco Rubio Rattles Some Big Beltway Cages </title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/hfontova/2011/02/22/marco-rubio-rattles-some-big-beltway-cages/#IDComment129905974</link>
<description>The people in the Bigs Blogs don&amp;#039;t share you anti-semitism and it is not welcome here. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/hfontova/2011/02/22/marco-rubio-rattles-some-big-beltway-cages/#IDComment129905974</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace :  Marco Rubio Rattles Some Big Beltway Cages </title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/hfontova/2011/02/22/marco-rubio-rattles-some-big-beltway-cages/#IDComment129905054</link>
<description>China seems to have plenty of cash.  Let them bail out Cuba.  Oh, wait...maybe they actually pay attention and think about their investments. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/hfontova/2011/02/22/marco-rubio-rattles-some-big-beltway-cages/#IDComment129905054</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>