1,236 comments posted · 2 followers · following 0
However, I do enjoy reading Mrs. Erikson's recap. At least then, I am not so out of touch.
1. Testing on animals actually benefit the animals.
2. Liberal scientist concerned about humanity actually destroys humanity in his attempt to save it.
Glaring hole in the plot: How do the apes plan to survive in the Redwood forest? Redwoods do not produce fruit so how are all of those apes planning to live? If Franco had not destoryed mankind, the sequeal would involve a starving ape population slowly killed off by hunters in the forest.
For example: Why CK do you say vile things about conservative women? What was your relationship to your mother like? Would you be okay with someone making the same vile comments about your mother because it is comedy? What does it mean to be a man to you? Why do you feel the need to demean women? Does that make you feel more like a man? Why are you a coward? Was your father an absentee father because he certainly did not raise you as a man?
This could be a starting point to understand why liberal men - who are actually less than manly - feel a need to be prissy. Here is to dialogue.
By the way Seth, Stewart is a horrible debater who only seems to win by gaming the debates on his show.