<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/324947</link>
		<description>Comments by Kevin_Kleen</description>
<item>
<title>RetailChatr : Will Banks Be Long-Term Owners?</title>
<link>http://www.retailchatr.com/2009/07/13/will-banks-be-long-term-owners/#IDComment27251987</link>
<description>Good post Chris. I agree with you - on the surface holding looks like a good strategy, but lenders typically way underestimate the headaches of ownership, and once they experience them they get rid of their REO and go back to lending. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.retailchatr.com/2009/07/13/will-banks-be-long-term-owners/#IDComment27251987</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Paul Kedrosky: Infectious Greed : Mapping Underwater San Diego County Homeowners</title>
<link>http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/02/mapping_underwa.html#IDComment15267493</link>
<description>I agree with the vintage and the exurb observations. The inset map also can be used to demonstrate the correlation between underwater homes and lower income neighborhoods (I&amp;#039;ve posted a map showing income levels for the corresponding area at the link below).  &lt;a href=&quot;http://residentialpropertyanalytics.blogspot.com/2009/02/underwater-homes-exurbs-and-income.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://residentialpropertyanalytics.blogspot.com/...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/02/mapping_underwa.html#IDComment15267493</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>