PG4
77p27 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0
5 years ago @ Mark Reads - Mark Reads 'Thud!': Pa... · 0 replies · +13 points
5 years ago @ Mark Reads - Mark Reads 'A Hat Full... · 3 replies · +34 points
5 years ago @ Mark Reads - Mark Reads 'Monstrous ... · 2 replies · +37 points
I feel like the emphasis on 'is Jackrum a trans man or not' is kind of... reductive? It's putting an emphasis on our modern understanding of gender identity rather than the context that he (and maybe even people that Pratchett might have actually known) would have lived in. (And it's super binary-focused as well, to boot.)
I have a cousin that's first generation Canadian with British parents who's around the age Pratchett would be if he hadn't passed, and he doesn't really identify with any of the terms most people my age would use. He might identify differently if he was twenty and in today's culture - but instead he uses she/her pronouns in drag or when referring to the identity he's built for that side of himself, and he/him pronouns otherwise. He's considered himself part of trans culture his whole life, but he wouldn't call himself trans.
I just feel like... there's a huge tapestry of identity out there which includes older parts of our community, and I'd be interested in hearing what their reading of Jackrum is.
13 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Meet Some of the Peopl... · 2 replies · 0 points
Being silent doesn't help you learn, it doesn't help you grow, and it doesn't let people work together for greater understanding.
And seriously...it's rude to constantly call someone stupid. I might just be Canadian that way, but I don't appreciate it, and I'm asking you to stop. Feel free to prove me wrong, or say that a specific thing I have said is foolish, but stop calling me ignorant.
13 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Meet Some of the Peopl... · 1 reply · 0 points
13 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Meet Some of the Peopl... · 1 reply · +1 points
13 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Meet Some of the Peopl... · 1 reply · +1 points
Who are you, exactly? You get to hear about repressed reports, unrecorded nationalities, and all sorts of things. It's almost like these things are rumours, paranoia, or things that weren't hidden. (A quick google showed a Norwegian site that said that the majority of rapes in Norway are immigrants not from the west.)
In England there's a lot of problems with a variety of immigrant cultures, especially the younger members of those communities. So a wide term seems more likely to be an umbrella statement to me.
Why have there been no mass killings of 'infidels' in North America? Or Europe? There's lots of Islamic believers in both continents, are there not? Those terribly violent people.
13 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Meet Some of the Peopl... · 3 replies · 0 points
13 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Meet Some of the Peopl... · 4 replies · +2 points
13 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Meet Some of the Peopl... · 3 replies · +1 points
Most people who follow Islam are not violent. Malcolm X converted...and then stopped being so radical. I've known muslims who have never even been overly snippy with me. There is an odd lack of constant news stories about the atrocities commited by muslims in the west, despite a fairly high population. And the odd stories about honour killings get a lot of news...but they're fairly isolated incidents.
Radicals are, again, in every religion. Islam, Christianity, athiesm, scientology all have their radical elements. But none of them commonly preach violence in this day and age.