<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/552690</link>
		<description>Comments by KandS711</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What&#039;s &#039;Latina&#039; Got to do With It?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/05/27/affirmative-action-is-racist/#IDComment22453202</link>
<description>I am not nearly as concerned by her comments, in and of themselves (in their minds, I&amp;#039;d guess, most judges actually believe that, for one reason or another, they are better suited to be judges than many others.)  I find it more disturbing that Judge Sotomayor would have the lack of restraint, temperament and simple common sense to actually give voice to her grandly delusional feelings at a public forum.  Incredible.  I am sure she&amp;#039;ll be confirmed -- but I&amp;#039;d love to be a fly on the wall in the meeting room at the Supreme Court when Sotomayor, Roberts and Scalia get going.  My guess is that she&amp;#039;ll turn out to be the Clarence Thomas of the left.  She&amp;#039;ll be a reliable liberal vote (as Thomas is a reliable conservative vote) -- though, like Thomas, not much else.  She&amp;#039;ll vote on ideological grounds, never write any major opinions (as her opinions to this point show that she&amp;#039;s really not much of a giant of legal thought), and will occasionally write a dissent that no one else will join. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/05/27/affirmative-action-is-racist/#IDComment22453202</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>