IntenseDebate - JonathonMoseley

12 years ago @ Expose Obama - O'Donnell Aide: O... · 6 replies · -1 points

God Bless America!
God bless Herman Cain!
God bless all Americans!

And I say to all "MUSLIMS" , go wherever you want, but just leave our country to the people who deserve it, Americans. Go back from whence you came. Just leave here while there is time.

13 years ago @ OnlyKent.com - Breakin... - Delaware Politician Ch... · 0 replies · +1 points

When I was briefly Christine O'Donnell's Treasurer in 2008 (only to meet a deadline while we sought an experienced Treasurer), the campaign did not have any money in 2008. I bought the bumper stickers and yard signs, etc., etc. on my personal c redit card, which the campaign later paid back to me. So I know of no such use of campaign funds. People are acting as if the campaign actually had a lot of money before recently.

However, I can say that the pundits are foolishly ignoring the actual FEC rules... which allow a candidate to be paid a salary or stipend from campaign funds. People should do their homework before saying foolish things.

13 years ago @ Expose Obama - O'Donnell Aide: O... · 1 reply · -1 points

You are very kind. Thank you.

13 years ago @ Expose Obama - O'Donnell Aide: O... · 1 reply · -1 points

I am certain that Chrstine will make a great US Senator. Any good campaign professional (or attorney) makes sure that he knows his client's or candidates strengths and weaknesses. Christine's strengths are all concentrated in the tasks and challenges of being a US Senator. Even things that are perhaps weaknesses in some vocations will be strengths in the environment of the US Senate.

What I meant was that when I have become aware of problems stirring I have sent those on to the campaign's email. For example, some journalists have called me asking me questions. When this indicates where they are headed on trying to attack Christine, I let the campaign know about it. But I have not heard anything back or coordinated in any way with her campaign since June 2008.

13 years ago @ Impeach Obama Campaign - O'Donnell Aide: Obama'... · 0 replies · +3 points

Please note that I am not affiliated with Christine O'Donnell's 2010 campaign for Senate. However, i strongly support Christine for the US Senate in 2010 and I will strongly speak out and organize for her as an independent private citizen. Everyone else is talking about the race. I will, too. However, I have not communicated with the campaign since June 2008 except strictly about accounting reimbursement of my unpaid expenses from 2008, which were eventually paid back to me. I have also forwarded attacks on Christine to the campaign's email address. But I have not received any response or feedback from Christine or her campaign since June 2008 about her campaign.

13 years ago @ Impeach Obama Campaign - O'Donnell Aide: Obama'... · 0 replies · +2 points

Please read the original post, not the distortion by the news media:
http://usnavjonmoseley.blogspot.com/2009/04/is-ba...

13 years ago @ Expose Obama - O'Donnell Aide: O... · 0 replies · -1 points

The original article was distorted, but even more convincing:
http://usnavjonmoseley.blogspot.com/2009/04/is-ba...

14 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Burning oil rig sinks ... · 1 reply · +2 points

The key word in "controlled demolitoin" is CONTROLLED.

Professional demolition experts are used to CONTROL the collapse of a building to avoid damaging nearby buildings and people.

That is why no one destroys a bulding from the top down. They blow out the bottom floors so that the building will fall into its footprint.

The WTC collapse would place a demo expert in JAIL for incompetence.

The two 1 acre towers fell across a 16 acre zone of debris.

2 acre footprints spread across 16 acres.

Massive damage to a dozen buildings in the area.

That's what we DON'T want with a "controlled" demolition

14 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Burning oil rig sinks ... · 1 reply · +2 points

I am not saying they are the same thing. I am saying that UNrefined crude oil burns hot enough to compromise the structural strength and integrity of steel. Steel both softens and expands when heated.

REFINED jet fuel also burns hot enough to soften and expand steel at the WTC enough to cause it to fail.

But if you want to compare the two, (a) the WTC towers were holding up a huge weight above the aircraft impact damage. So the WTC case is worse. The oil rig fire on the surface did NOT involve large weight being carried. The WTC case did involve massive weight abvoe the fire.

Both are a steel frame. A building is NOT a solid block. It is a skirt of an outside wall hanging on a steel frame. Once the frame is compromised, the WTC fell as a group of DISCONNECTED steel links.

14 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Burning oil rig sinks ... · 3 replies · +2 points

WRong on all points.

It has happened MANY times before. Just because "Truthers" are liars, does not make it so.

MANY steel buildings have collapsed due to fire alone.

Second, movement to the side requires a FORCE PUSHING it to the side. That is basic physics. Gravity pulls straight down. Unless you have some force pushing to the side, you CANNOT get a building moving to the side. It must fall straight down.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with JonathonMoseley

People I'm following

JonathonMoseley