<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/348945</link>
		<description>Comments by John_Thornton</description>
<item>
<title>HackneyPost.co.uk : Hackney wheelchair basketball team look to debut tournament </title>
<link>http://hackneypost.co.uk/?p=1045#IDComment16848751</link>
<description>I am shocked to see students of journalism using an antiquated and derisory term such as &amp;quot;able-bodied&amp;quot; within the context of a story on disability.  I refer you - and your colleagues - to Hacked Off - A Journalist&amp;#039;s Guide to Disability produced jointly by the Disability Now newspaper and the National Union of Journalists. Please check out:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scope.org.uk/disablism/downloads/hackedoffguide.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.scope.org.uk/disablism/downloads/hacke...&lt;/a&gt;  Now if you really wanted a story ... you could investigate how much money Hackney Council and the Learning Trust has wasted on publicity for a club promoting sport for &amp;quot;able-bodied&amp;quot; and disabled people.  And if you are too lazy to check out the guide and you&amp;#039;re wondering ... what is the correct term to use?  Most people would say &amp;quot;disabled and non-disabled&amp;quot;.  Myself, I prefer &amp;quot;disabled and not-yet-disabled&amp;quot; because, if you live long enough, you too are more than likely to join our ranks.    </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://hackneypost.co.uk/?p=1045#IDComment16848751</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>