gdp's Comments

Big Government : Random House Doubles Down, Defends Anti-Palin Literary Hoax; McGinniss

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:39:07 +0000

I would be curious if there is a certain billionaire in the background willing to cover any of the losses incurred by Random House and McGinnis in a judgement for libel. It certainly looks like malice and recklessness. I suspect they are currying favor with the Leftist establishment by doing this to Palin. And not matter what - this would damage anyone. Look at Tina Fey, her quote about seeing "Russia" from her house is still attributed to Palin.

Big Government : Weinergate Bombshell: New Woman Comes Forward Claiming Cache of Intimate Ph

Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:30:30 +0000

How sweet- and I recall Toobin's arrogance and "outrage" at what Breitbart said and that CNN allowed it. I hope Toobin apologizes and admits that his buddy Weiner is a sexual predator.

Breitbart.com : Heaven is a \'fairy story\', says Stephen Hawking

Mon, 16 May 2011 20:10:35 +0000

Hawkings is not speaking as a scientist but as a bitter angry man from prejudice and bigotry. I don't blame him, I might be just as "mad" if I were in his shoes. Essentially, he is having a tantrum akin to a 2 year old on the floor screaming an kicking. The best to do is ignore it and move on. It will stop before long .

Breitbart.com : Heaven is a \'fairy story\', says Stephen Hawking

Mon, 16 May 2011 20:04:48 +0000

Have you ever generally noticed, the kindest people are those with Downs Syndrome with IQs of 60-70. Isn't it strange, that serial killers generally have higher IQs. Did all you you know that the mean IQ of the German General Staff in Nazi German was 160? I remember the quote from Elwood P Dowd (character played by Jimmy Stewart - Harvey). "Years ago my mother used to say to me, she'd say, "In this world, Elwood, you must be" - she always called me Elwood - "In this world, Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant." Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." Personally, I think that statement outweighs all the get discoveries of the past 500 years.

Breitbart.com : Heaven is a \'fairy story\', says Stephen Hawking

Mon, 16 May 2011 19:53:08 +0000

Hawkings has ignored all the data concerning cause and effect. He points out the "negatives" of religion but forgets the "negatives" of atheism. He has also ignored the rules of the scientific method. The only way to prove that "heaven" is a fairy tale is to explore every part of this universe as well as alternate realities and realms. Until he has - then he can't claim to make anything more than a religious assertion. That religion is Atheism: where you can only say - "I DON'T BELIEVE THERE IS A SUPREME BEING"- you can't prove there isn't one scientifically. Neither can I prove there is one scientifically, but my basis is faith - and that has different requirements. In short - the ONLY THING HE CAN SAY AS A SCIENTIST IS: "I DON"T KNOW". But he doesn't - looks like there is a "prejudice" and "bigotry" there. I don't fault him for it. If I had his illness- I could very well be "bitter". But his obvious errors in making these statements need to be pointed out. He doesn't know what he is talking about. Now as for the evils of religion versus the purity and morality of atheism: Take for example - all of the people "murdered" in the name of Marxism- which is an atheistic belief system. You would have more people dead than in all the wars in the last 2000 years: nearly 1/2 billion people. Then you have charities. Kindly name me one hospital that was established in the "name" of Atheism. Name me one true philanthropist that truly helps people in the name of atheism. All of the hospitals in China were created directly and indirectly by Christian Missionaries. All of the Universities were created directly and indirectly by Christian Missionaries. Name me ONE Atheistic charitable organization -there are NONE (and please don't point out the ACLU or the Red Cross). The Red Cross was started by a Swiss Evangelical - why do you think he used the Cross? Then there are scientists that are creationists - if you don't believe the list -research it for yourself. http://creation.com/creation-scientists All I would say to Stephen Hawking - God gave you your mind - and and He also gave you your disease - I know that. He could take your life - take your mind - or restore your health - my point is - In looking at all possibilities - yes you could be utterly rational and brave in facing the unknown. You also could be a fool. Two possibilities - and eternity in the balance.

Breitbart.com : Heaven is a \'fairy story\', says Stephen Hawking

Mon, 16 May 2011 19:32:51 +0000

Sir Isaac Newton was a devout believer in God and also a Creationist. Everything that Einstein "knew" came from this "deluded" - your words - man. Newton created the discipline of calculus. And what have you done bananapatch? Sit in your mommy's basement and blog. I will seriously consider atheism when Atheism produces someone at the level of brilliance of Newton. There are none. Most - including Hawkings - are hacks.

Big Journalism : ABC News Continues Lobby Effort for ObamaCare

Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:17:42 +0000

The only hope is a Civil War. Once the left is defeated they need to be exterminated or banished. Sounds extremely vicious, but the "body" of United States has a "gangrenous" growth called Pan-Leninism in the guise of "progressive" agenda. Those people and institutions infected by this Pan-Leninism are necrotic and need to be "amputated" or "removed". I assure you Conservatives: once they have absolute power: they will do the same to you.

Breitbart.tv : Liberal Star Blogger Ezra Klein: Constitution 'Has No Binding Power on Anything'; Confusing Because

Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:31:46 +0000

A journalist becomes a journalist because they are simply not smart enough to solve the math required in more stringent disciplines. Next time you debate a reporter: ask them if they can solve a quadratic equation. They squirm - get defensive. What is funny: I have a 12 year old that understands exactly what it says and any person who says that it is hard to understand is simply a "Hitler/Stalin" wannabe.

Breitbart.com : New Zealand wooed China to curb US influence: report

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 19:36:42 +0000

Communist / Fascist - Communism is one form of a fascist system. The difference between Nazism and Communism is simply in the execution of Fascism - how it is applied. The point is: the government is Authoritarian and in no way feels that men are endowed by their creator by inalienable rights. The Communist/Fascist/Nazi is an authoritarian that believes the government "gives" the rights and they can remove them for the greater good. The republican (not the party - the concept) - who follows the tenets of the US constitution and the philosophy of the founding fathers believe man is "BORN" with these rights and it is the place of government to protect them and NOT TO INFRINGE UPON THEM. When you think about it: that is why we constitutionalists despise socialists: they are the same thing - a bunch of rabid Statists that have replaced God with the Federal Government. And because man is basically sinful - the government is not a righteous and holy God, but the government more resembles SATAN.

Breitbart.com : New Zealand wooed China to curb US influence: report

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 19:28:27 +0000

The difference between this and most "released" information - is that it is innocuous. This could have been "leaked" by an unnamed source. That is the hypocrisy of the left. There have been Assanges in government for decades. They are known as the confidential source: leaking information no matter how it embarrassed the US. This information in no way threatens any ones life: and it is not an embarrassment to the US government. I am an American and a Nationalist. If they embarrass the socialist monstrosity in New Zealand - who cares.

Breitbart.com : New Zealand wooed China to curb US influence: report

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 19:22:02 +0000

It is the anger of socialism and its failure that spurs this hatred of the US. If the US is driven toward socialism and marxism, there is not a comparison to socialism any longer- that shows socialism as a failure. These socialists (like in New Zealand ) are so rabid, they will make deals with racist nations like China (or France). If the Chinese maintain a dominant influence in the Pacific: do you think they will follow a "live and let live policy"? How do you think they will treat the White and the Maori populations of New Zealand? The US, for all its problems is a proponent of Liberty and Freedom. The Chinese are the proponents of totalitarianism and wonderful things like child trafficking (what do you think happens to the little girls who never get adopted). The point is: this is the socialist - a berserker who will destroy their own country to preserve the myth that socialism is good. If you are a freedom loving American: they are your enemy and we will ultimately have to "purge" them from our midst .

Big Peace : 'We Wish Her the Best'? Cartoonist, Threatened by Islamists, Disappears

Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:08:24 +0000

You want real outrage. The city of New York has given the Iman planning the NYC Islamic Center police protection because "he feels threatened" with all the outrage. I quote "There's just a lot of crazies and that's why he has police protection from the NYPD" . Muslims are essentially cowards. You face them fairly, they cower like the little dogs that they are. That is why they like to "ambush", or kill innocents. Children don't shoot back. When is someone going to have the cajones to demand that we not allow Muslims into our country until ALL MUSLIMS RENOUNCE TERRORISM and they turn over the terrorists? There is precedent. In the 19th Century they curtailed Chinese immigration because of OPIUM and Prostitution.

Breitbart.com : Clinton: Democrats to hold Senate, House in 2010

Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:24:55 +0000

Clinton said the same thing in 94 - and look how wrong he was. He is a "practical child molester (a 50+ year old man sodomizing a 22 year old girl is no better than a 40+ year old sodomizing a 16 year old) If the democrats do win - we WILL HAVE A CIVIL WAR and it will be the end of the American Republic. Even if the Conservatives win that CIvil War, the blood will be so bad that it will be a slaughterhouse.

Big Government : BREAKING: San Diego ACORN Document Dump Scandal

Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:17:19 +0000

The government is acting like they are above it. Senators voting against the polls, and Acorn and the establishment thumbing their nose. They think they have an edge. I think they full intend to give the vote to aliens and allow guest workers in (with the vote) to vote in the next election cycle. Ladies and Gentlemen, if that happens you have been disenfranchised and the only possible alternative and solution is Civil War to remove these traitors and criminals from power. They know something we don't, and that is what scares me.

Breitbart.com : Outrage in Washington over Obama\'s Japan bow

Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:25:39 +0000

The liberals pointed to Bush bowing to the Saudi King. If he did: he was just as wrong. I supported Bush because he was the lesser of 2 evils and as a Conservative I am sick of having to choose between the lesser of 2 evils. This liberal apology for Obama also shows the complete bankruptcy of Liberals: what does Bush bowing have to do with Obama? That is a petulant teenagers excuse. He did it! Frankly, I thought Bush was the consummation of all evil, therefore if Bush bowed, why would Obama? Obama and his incessant bowing is a major problem with US foreign policy for the last 60 years: Presidents trying to make the United States part of a greater world community. The only thing the POTUS should worry about is American honor, prestige, respect, and fear. Countries "feard" are rarely attacked. Not how much we are "liked". If I am walking down a dangerous street in the inner city, I don't want to be likable, I want to be terrifying. And this world is a very dark and dangerous place. The President of the United States is the head of state and head of government with real authority and power (something the emperor of Japan is not). Historically, when one king bowed to another king - that meant he was placing himself as a vassal to the object of his submission. It may be a gesture of respect, but the symbolism is insulting to us as FREE AMERICAN CITIZENS - because Obama is placing fealty symbolically to whomever he bows. (And if Bush did it, the same goes for him). At the least it is a violation of his oath to support and defend the Constitution. As Constitutionally elected head of government and enforcer of Constitutional laws and protections, by bowing to the Saudi King and the emperor of Japan, he has symbolically placed the Constitution under another Head of State. Symbols are important particularly to Asians (e.g. Japanese, Chinese, Arabs...etc.). To Europeans it may mean nothing but to Asians, it denotes submission. Is it traitorous i.e. a betrayal of the United States? Not in the criminal sense(he cannot be charged with treason), but in the moral sense (like marital infidelity) I think it is.

Breitbart.com : Chinese greet \'Oba Mao\' with flaming statue, fakes

Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:55:42 +0000

First - this is not entirely complimentary - since Mao is not really looked up to - Deng Xiao Ping is the hero now. What I find fantastic is they are likening him to a murderous genocidal maniac, and he cannot do anything. The Conservatives in this country will beat him up with it, and he can't feign outrage because he gave us away to China. I think this is hysterical. The boob is trapped.

Breitbart.com : Hospital: Ft. Hood shooting suspect awake, talking

Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:12:07 +0000

Did anybody notice that the Army Chief of Staff is looking out for a "anti-Muslim" backlash, but not for radical Islamic Jihadists in uniform. My God, Hassan was in contact with AlQaeda and they ignored it. We have buffoons in charge. Can anyone imagine Eisenhower telling ABC that we are going to look out for an anti-Nazi backlash? We might as well all become Muslims and adopt Sharia law or remove these bufoons and replace them with warriors - not Barney the Purple Dinosaur. The question that should be asked, can Islamists peacefully coexist with us in this country. The High sounding concept of diversity was ALWAYS incumbent upon assimilating. In other words adopting our Western European, British and Christian culture - that is what we are! Islam demands that we become an Islamic Republic under Sharia Law. We must peacefully expel them by purchasing their property and goods and make them leave. Those who are citizens - we tolerate until the last of them die out. If we do not confront this problem, we will be dealing with more violence from them and there will be a point that the government will not be able to prevent the backlash, and in this case innocents will be caught up in it. The problem is you can't tell a "westernized" Muslim from a sleeper waiting to strike until it is too late. And even the "peace loving" Muslims cover for the Jihadists. It can't work. They must all go.

Breitbart.com : Obama says don\'t jump to conclusions on shooting

Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:39:01 +0000

Americans had better get used to the possibility that we may have to remove him by force. If you watched his response (which was edited by CBS news) it was creepy and frightening how cold he is. It is also important to realize that he is acting like he has an edge. He does not care how people are voting or standing against him peacefully and politically. I am afraid Obama will do something by 2010 or 2012 to prevent the peaceful transfer of power and ensure his continuation in office. This guy wants to be president for life. I only hope, if it comes to that (and believe you me I pray that it does not because they never work out the way anyone expects), the Conservatives have the fortitude of free men to "stand between their loved homes and wars desolation." This war will be domestic - aka Civil War.

Breitbart.com : Obama says don\'t jump to conclusions on shooting

Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:29:07 +0000

He is a leftist Muslim, that is Obama. I have friends in Kenya that say that Obama being a Muslim is common knowledge. I was in China until 2008 (4 years) and all of the Muslim Expats (Syrian, Iranian, Iraqi) all claimed that he was a Muslim. What most people do not know is that Islam allows you to fake being a Christian etc when you are in a Jihad. The purpose is to blend in. So if a Muslim claims he loves this country and hates the jihadist he may be telling the truth or he may be lying in order to infiltrate. Not a good choice: so the only thing that is left is not to allow Muslims in any sensitive position because by the basis of their religion, they may be lying to infiltrate in order to "awake" and perform an attack. I have read where Obama just may be a "Manchurian Candidate".

Breitbart.com : Runaway convert back in Ohio after 3-month flight

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:56:24 +0000

Many times I have seen 17 year olds in this situation emancipated. If the parents were Christians and she wanted to pursue Islam, I am sure the state would have emancipated. This is extremely odd. She will be 18 in just a few months and completely free to go where she will. But the state if taking a terrible risk here. What if she is murdered by her father? What if they whisk her off to their homeland and killer her there? The attitude of the public is such that there will be blood if that little girl dies. Not only Muslim, but also the petty little pip squeak bureaucrats that allowed it to happen. They are taking a terrible risk - not just with the girl, but with the backlash - and it won't be just opinion polls.