<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/391366</link>
		<description>Comments by Jim_Hughes</description>
<item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : The Twitter Fallout: Managing the Un-Follow Armageddon and Creating a New Strategy</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/the-twitter-fallout-managing-the-un-follow-armageddon-and-creating-a-new-strategy/#IDComment31609461</link>
<description>I used autofollow for a short while, and it was obvious what was happening.  Even though I was pretty good at monitoring new followers and blocking or just stopping the follow of bad actors, I still ended up with a lot of people who were not interacting with me and who I didn&amp;#039;t want to interact with.  So I spent some time manually unfollowing them, and as I notice tweets that I find offensive, I unfollow or block them.  Twitter was more fun when it was smaller and more interactive -- not a numbers game.  I&amp;#039;m driving mine back there as well.  Smaller is better. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/the-twitter-fallout-managing-the-un-follow-armageddon-and-creating-a-new-strategy/#IDComment31609461</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Automating the Social Web is Foolish and Makes You Look Like a Fool</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/05/25/automating-the-social-web-is-foolish-and-makes-you-look-like-a-fool/#IDComment22289862</link>
<description>Good post and better discussion.  I don&amp;#039;t like auto dm&amp;#039;s, even the ones that don&amp;#039;t pitch the individual&amp;#039;s website.  But I tolerate them.  I also don&amp;#039;t auto follow.  But it&amp;#039;s okay if you do.  There&amp;#039;s room for being different. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 03:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/05/25/automating-the-social-web-is-foolish-and-makes-you-look-like-a-fool/#IDComment22289862</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Michelle&#039;s Blog : Rock On, @Debutaunt! You Will Be Loved Forever</title>
<link>http://www.michellesblog.net/meet-people-in-austin/rock-on-debutaunt-you-will-be-loved-forever#IDComment21800356</link>
<description>Like so many others, I&amp;#039;ve been touched by your sister&amp;#039;s battle and spunk and faith -- and your writing about it.  Thanks for sharing her life and yours.  Blessings to you and your family in the days ahead. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 04:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.michellesblog.net/meet-people-in-austin/rock-on-debutaunt-you-will-be-loved-forever#IDComment21800356</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Who&#039;s Engaging the Septuagenarians?</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/03/21/whos-engaging-the-septuagenarians/#IDComment17347471</link>
<description>Good point.  And remember, percentages are somewhat misleading as not all age segments have the same number of people.  Boomers  (45-63 yo&amp;#039;s) are the largest single segment of the population, and climbing fast in internet usage, including social media. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/03/21/whos-engaging-the-septuagenarians/#IDComment17347471</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Human3rror : Caption Please.</title>
<link>http://human3rror.com/2009/03/21/caption-please-4/#IDComment17347213</link>
<description>Yeah, I&amp;#039;m happy.  Really happy. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://human3rror.com/2009/03/21/caption-please-4/#IDComment17347213</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>