<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/4155332</link>
		<description>Comments by JimPeron</description>
<item>
<title>Center for a Stateless Society : &quot;Liberty&quot; Needs Your Support</title>
<link>http://c4ss.org/content/21478#IDComment725598836</link>
<description>This is already in pdf format and for sale for $9.95. I would think that the total cost of putting that on line is pretty low considering it already exists in pdf.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 04:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://c4ss.org/content/21478#IDComment725598836</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : &#039;Homosexuals Are The Most Violent Of The Abusers Of Children&#039; Says Baptist Minister</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/homosexuals-are-the-most-violent-of-the-abusers-of-children-says-baptist-minister/politics/2013/06/17/68844#IDComment663166365</link>
<description>As far as I can remember his mother, Madalyn Murray O&amp;#039;Hair  was also very anti-gay. She was generally a nasty and unpleasant person and I don&amp;#039;t see the acorn falling far from the tree. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/homosexuals-are-the-most-violent-of-the-abusers-of-children-says-baptist-minister/politics/2013/06/17/68844#IDComment663166365</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/ : Priest brands Archbishop of Canterbury a \&#039;w****r\&#039; on Facebook post about gay marriage - BelfastTel</title>
<link>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/priest-brands-archbishop-of-canterbury-a-wr-on-facebook-post-about-gay-marriage-29327814.html#IDComment656974127</link>
<description>Well, just because it&amp;#039;s true doesn&amp;#039;t mean he should have said it.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/priest-brands-archbishop-of-canterbury-a-wr-on-facebook-post-about-gay-marriage-29327814.html#IDComment656974127</guid>
</item><item>
<title>WPMT-TV : Baptists to leave Boy Scouts</title>
<link>http://fox43.com/2013/05/31/baptists-to-leave-boy-scouts#IDComment654053735</link>
<description>Joe: Don&amp;#039;t project onto me. Where did I say anything about forcing Baptists to do anything? Nowhere, that&amp;#039;s where. I graduated a Baptist high school and went to a Baptist Bible college and yes, I left that church quite happily when I became an adult. What I mentioned was that Baptists don&amp;#039;t leave everyone else alone, they don&amp;#039;t mind their own business. I know them very well and they are addicted to meddling. Not only do they go door to door annoying people, but the Southern Baptists supported slavery&amp;mdash;hardly minding your own business. They support federal legislation to impose their theological views about how people should live on the rest of the country. Here&amp;#039;s how I see it. Equal rights for everyone, including Baptists. The state should only protect our basic rights of life, liberty and property, and beyond that no one should lobby the state to impose morality on others (such as the Moral Majority did)  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fox43.com/2013/05/31/baptists-to-leave-boy-scouts#IDComment654053735</guid>
</item><item>
<title>WPMT-TV : Baptists to leave Boy Scouts</title>
<link>http://fox43.com/2013/05/31/baptists-to-leave-boy-scouts#IDComment653714955</link>
<description>Gee, doesn&amp;#039;t this mean if we put a sign on our door &amp;quot;gay people welcome&amp;quot; that the Baptists will leave us alone? I sure hope so. There is a reason Southern Baptists have been losing members. I know they are absolutely sure as to what the Bible said. But then, when they were formed they were absolutely sure it condoned slavery as well. They never learn, but then they are opposed to learning.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Jun 2013 05:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fox43.com/2013/05/31/baptists-to-leave-boy-scouts#IDComment653714955</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KCPQ-TV : Attorney: New charge against &#039;Barefoot Bandit&#039; constitutes double jeopardy</title>
<link>http://q13fox.com/2013/02/26/attorney-new-charge-against-barefoot-bandit-constitutes-double-jeopardy#IDComment600760681</link>
<description>Weyrich is a two-bit bureaucrat trying to make a name for himself. He should backdown and shut up. He is just seeking publicity for himself.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://q13fox.com/2013/02/26/attorney-new-charge-against-barefoot-bandit-constitutes-double-jeopardy#IDComment600760681</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Heritage Foundry : Social Science Confirms: Kids Need Married Moms and Dads</title>
<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2013/03/15/social-science-confirms-kids-need-married-moms-and-dads/#IDComment596905935</link>
<description>If the evidence is so strong why were the signers so heavily weighted from specifically religiously-based schools? Real evidence isn&amp;#039;t only shared by people mostly with a particularly conservative religious bent. It is noticed by lots of people, religious or not. Oh, of course, there is a larger acceptance of a view on this, from a broader group of people, but it holds the opposite view.    </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.heritage.org/2013/03/15/social-science-confirms-kids-need-married-moms-and-dads/#IDComment596905935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Heritage Foundry : Kids Need a Mom and Dad, Says Openly Gay Adoptive Parent</title>
<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2013/03/13/kids-need-a-mom-and-dad-says-openly-gay-adoptive-parent/#IDComment595129848</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s why I think God should be stopped from allowing fathers to die, or mothers. We are all better off with &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot; situations which doesn&amp;#039;t mean we always have those options. Is it better for a kid to have no parents than to have two fathers or two mothers? The fact is that a lot of the children that gay couples adopt have sat unwanted by others. Of course, none of the adoption issue revolves around marriage. But, lets allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good!  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.heritage.org/2013/03/13/kids-need-a-mom-and-dad-says-openly-gay-adoptive-parent/#IDComment595129848</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Daily Camera.com: : David Hazen: Libertarian voters -- Don\&#039;t waste your vote - Boulder Daily Camera</title>
<link>http://www.dailycamera.com/letters/ci_21887891/david-hazen-libertarian-voters-dont-waste-your-vote#IDComment476874153</link>
<description>Votes aren&amp;#039;t horse races where bet on a winner. You state your beliefs and what you want. If neither of the two bigger parties want to provide that, then tough for them. This is especially true for Obama who vastly increased the deportations of people over Bush, who ramped up the war in Afghanistan, who raided four times as many medical marijuana clinics as Bush, who institute a &amp;quot;kill list&amp;quot; where the president picks people to assassinate, including American citizens, without due process, who is defending warrantless searches in the Supreme Court at this time.... You may think these are minor flaws. They are major failures. Obama doesn&amp;#039;t deserve votes. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dailycamera.com/letters/ci_21887891/david-hazen-libertarian-voters-dont-waste-your-vote#IDComment476874153</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Heritage Foundry : How Chick-fil-A Serves American Families </title>
<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/28/how-chick-fil-a-serves-american-families/#IDComment410765809</link>
<description>Families include gay people and gay people form families. What we need is small government allowing people to form their own marriage contracts. Deregulate marriage so any two adults can enter the contract, as they can with any other contract. Reduce federal dominance in violation of federalist principles, by repealing DOMA and end the regulatory costs of DOMA for private companies.  It&amp;#039;s time to limit government, not expand the federal role for someone&amp;#039;s religious agenda. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 22:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/28/how-chick-fil-a-serves-american-families/#IDComment410765809</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Pointed Remarks : BioEdge: The missing link in the same-sex marriage debate</title>
<link>http://www.bioedge.org/index.php/pointedremarks/view/10085/#IDComment404572664</link>
<description>Is voluntarily donating surrogacy okay? Or is it just a disdain for monetary exchange that upsets you?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bioedge.org/index.php/pointedremarks/view/10085/#IDComment404572664</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : OPINION: Is John Corvino In Cahoots With NOM On Regnerus &#039;Study&#039;?</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398176636</link>
<description>PS: you turned a one sentence comment defending debate into an extended discussion. Apparently to disagree with you makes one an &amp;quot;attack troll.&amp;quot;  I&amp;#039;m sorry, but how old are you? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 02:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398176636</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : OPINION: Is John Corvino In Cahoots With NOM On Regnerus &#039;Study&#039;?</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398172990</link>
<description>Paranoid and fundamentalist, they often go together. What I said was that debate is useful. You morally damn talking to others because the others are evil if they don&amp;#039;t already agree. I don&amp;#039;t need to email Corvino and demand he do anything. That is also the sort of rot fundamentalist thinking does --- it demands that not only must every agree with their morality, but their course of action as well. Corvino&amp;#039;s debate do good. You, on the other hand, want to preach to the choir. It may make you feel good, but when it comes to actually shifting views in the wider culture, it is pretty damn useless. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398172990</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : OPINION: Is John Corvino In Cahoots With NOM On Regnerus &#039;Study&#039;?</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398155564</link>
<description>You are misstating the evidence. While people who know gay people are MORE likely to be supportive of equality of rights that doesn&amp;#039;t mean they didn&amp;#039;t debate the issues, or that others, who don&amp;#039;t gay people on a personal level, haven&amp;#039;t come to support gay rights. In fact, the surveys that show these people are MORE likely to be supportive also show that people who don&amp;#039;t know anyone personally who is gay can also be supportive.   Under your fundamentalist moralism then no one should ever speak to anyone else if they feel the other person is wrong morally. Well, given that many people think that most issues are issues of morality, at one level or another, yours would be a pretty isolated world with lots of angry people glaring at one another and refusing to speak. And, if I think being open to discussion and debate is a morally good thing, does that mean, by your standard, that I should stop speaking to you? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398155564</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : OPINION: Is John Corvino In Cahoots With NOM On Regnerus &#039;Study&#039;?</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398132267</link>
<description>Exactly how do you think the majority of people who have switched sides on this issue have done so? Do you think it was screaming at them, or talking to them? People change minds because of debate. And, anyone who thinks the debate is with Maggie has it all wrong. She is merely a stand-in for the rest of the public. Let her be trounced in debate after debate and minds change. And all the evidence shows they are changing in just one direction. You can throw that aside and feel holier-than-thou, if you want. But it is relatively useless in doing what needs to be done&amp;mdash;change minds. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398132267</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : OPINION: Is John Corvino In Cahoots With NOM On Regnerus &#039;Study&#039;?</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398076418</link>
<description>Only fundamentalist see debating as useless. And the fundamentalist mind set is just as much a part of the gay community as the Christian community.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/opinion-is-john-corvino-in-cahoots-with-nom-on-regnerus-study/politics/2012/07/08/43070#IDComment398076418</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : No New Taxes. No Program Cuts. An Elegant Solution: A Living Wage </title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/an-elegant-political-solution-to-economic-stagnation-a-living-wage/analysis/2012/06/27/39221#IDComment393605458</link>
<description>Set the wage wherever you wish but what do you do to make a worker&amp;#039;s labor equal to that value? If a worker doesn&amp;#039;t have the skills or experience to be worth that amount then all you do is leave them unemployed.   Imagine a minimum price for anything: diamonds, books or chairs. If you set the minimum price for chairs at $100 there are a lot of chairs that no will buy. Not all chairs have the same value. Not all labor has the same value. And when the value falls below the minimum you arbitrarily set, no matter your intentions, you prices some labor, or chairs as the case may be, out of the market entirely. The $10 chair may just get broken up and sold as fire wood, but what happens to the laborer who doesn&amp;#039;t have the skills and value to meet your arbitrary minimum? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jul 2012 23:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/an-elegant-political-solution-to-economic-stagnation-a-living-wage/analysis/2012/06/27/39221#IDComment393605458</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Who Are The 17 Democrats Who Voted To Hold Eric Holder In Contempt?</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/who-are-the-17-democrats-who-voted-to-hold-eric-holder-in-contempt/politics/2012/06/29/42385#IDComment393603544</link>
<description>Good for them. No more DEA coverups. Actually we should abolish the DEA and end the war on drugs. What happened to &amp;quot;transparent&amp;quot; government when people promoted Obama they said it would bring just that. Now they applaud those who vote against making it clear what the government did. Hypocrisy. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jul 2012 23:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/who-are-the-17-democrats-who-voted-to-hold-eric-holder-in-contempt/politics/2012/06/29/42385#IDComment393603544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Ron Paul: I&#039;m On Social Security But &#039;I Want Young People To Opt Out&#039;</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/ron-paul-im-on-social-security-but-i-want-young-people-to-opt-out/politics/2012/06/20/41843#IDComment386220135</link>
<description>The right to opt for young people is not hypocritical. Anyone has the right to take out of a system that they are forced to pay into. Similarly it is not hypocritical to advocate a change in that system.   Consider a situation where the state takes all one&amp;#039;s income and then doles out all &amp;quot;benefits.&amp;quot; One can oppose the system without having to starve to death. People coerced into a system are not hypocrites for using it, even if they want to end the coercion. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/ron-paul-im-on-social-security-but-i-want-young-people-to-opt-out/politics/2012/06/20/41843#IDComment386220135</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Zimbabwe Daily : Zimbabwe arrests British presenter at classical music festival &ndash; Zimbabwe News Daily at your f</title>
<link>http://www.thezimbabwemail.com/zimbabwe/11918-zimbabwe-arrests-british-presenter-at-classical-music-festival.html#IDComment367887345</link>
<description>Does anyone seriously expect anything but authoritarian nonsense from the Mugabe regime? Anyone willing to kill his own people will never treat others with respect. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.thezimbabwemail.com/zimbabwe/11918-zimbabwe-arrests-british-presenter-at-classical-music-festival.html#IDComment367887345</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>