<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/986580</link>
		<description>Comments by JimKislinsky</description>
<item>
<title>Spark | CBC Radio : Full Interview: Homer Spring on cell phones in the classroom</title>
<link>http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2010/04/full-interview-homer-spring-on-cell-phones-in-the-classroom/#IDComment71104349</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m all for harnassing technological tools as long as those tools are used as a means to an end.  We have to constantly ask ourselves: are we using the technology as a tool or is it using us?  All too often high technology is so distractive and all consuming that it doesn&amp;#039;t allow for for the quiet reflectiveness required for deep thought and to do its work.  Let us not forget that Andrew Wiles solved Fermat&amp;#039;s last theorum (probably the greatest intellectual achievement of our time) with three tools: pen, paper, and brain, because it required creativity, imagination, and the quiet time to allow his subconcious to do its work--aspects of thought which are restricted by technological tools. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2010/04/full-interview-homer-spring-on-cell-phones-in-the-classroom/#IDComment71104349</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>