en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/607564 Comments by JenBee http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.155b621fd0222d640f22c8ee8ab21457.b01&show_article=1#IDComment125713917 In 2008 when we saw record high gas prices, Obama himself stated that he's perfectly fine with $4 gas and supports it, he just wished that the price rose gradually instead of all at once as it did. Anyone who thinks this man is going to do ANYTHING to stop the rise in gas prices is crazy or stupid or both. This is exactly what he WANTS. And as far as the poor goes, you bet your butt Obama will be up there talking about how we should give vouchers to poor people, so us taxpayers and the eeevil rich pay for 'the poor folks' gas. After all, class warfare is what Obama's all about. We are so screwed. Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:22:31 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.155b621fd0222d640f22c8ee8ab21457.b01&show_article=1#IDComment125713917 http://keithhennessey.com/2010/08/16/obama-economy-facts/#IDComment93703112 What an excellent article, with figures backed up by hard facts and statistics that cannot be argued with. Great job. Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:56:57 +0000 http://keithhennessey.com/2010/08/16/obama-economy-facts/#IDComment93703112 http://keithhennessey.com/2010/08/16/obama-economy-facts/#IDComment93702834 And I'd like to point out that the Democrats have had total control over both Houses of Congress since 2006. Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:54:47 +0000 http://keithhennessey.com/2010/08/16/obama-economy-facts/#IDComment93702834 http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/hawaii-election-clerk-story-grows-on-youtube/#IDComment84726311 I live in Michigan, and recently had to renew my driver's license. I opted for the 'enhanced driver's license' which doubles as a passport, allowing me entrance into Canada. To obtain this 'enhanced' driver's license, I had to provide my long-form birth certificate (the one Obama is hiding from us) which includes: the names of both of my parents AND their ethnicity AND the state and county in which they were born; furthermore, this document was signed by the physician who delivered me. The short-form birth certificate that Obama provided contains none of these things. By this standard, our current POTUS could not and would not even qualify for an enhanced driver's license from the state of Michigan. Sun, 4 Jul 2010 16:56:42 +0000 http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/hawaii-election-clerk-story-grows-on-youtube/#IDComment84726311 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.af09375837a21e6bf486e0c8aed43c9a.01&show_article=1#IDComment49940575 LOL!! Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:12:36 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.af09375837a21e6bf486e0c8aed43c9a.01&show_article=1#IDComment49940575 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49544796 hmmm, I don't think so, Greg. It would have to come from the media, and this media is so wound up in protecting the man they pushed for president, I don't think they'll ever turn on him. Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:03:46 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49544796 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49544450 Yep Greg... voting 'Present' is in fact ALL he's done for the past 11 months. No spine, no convictions, no integrity. Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:59:45 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49544450 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49543152 Know what's funny? If Obama were not President and had to fly commercially, he wouldn't be able to fly overseas, because he wouldn't ever show his passport. I still can't believe we have a President who has spent over $1 million to hide his long-form birth certificate (the one that states the name of the physician who delivered him and the name of the hospital he was born in), his passport, his kindergarten records, his adoption records, his Chicago Bar information, and all of his school records from when he attended Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard (that includes scholarship info, grades, group associations, and all of the papers he wrote, including his thesis and everything he wrote while at Harvard Review). Shocking, isn't it? Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:44:15 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49543152 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49542494 If we had a responsible media that was intent on reporting news and providing real journalism instead of fellating Obama 24/7, this would be broadcast as Obama's 'My Pet Goat' moment. I mean, come on, Bush was blasted for sitting there for 15 mins (he didn't want to scare the children), but Obama gets a free pass for sitting on this for THREE DAYS before deigning to speak to Americans? Give me a break. Our President is so embarrassingly weak and ill-prepared for the job. Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:37:26 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49542494 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49542282 Great points! Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:34:47 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49542282 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49540921 9/11 occured 9 months after Bush took office... this attack occurred 11 months after Obama took office... you are making this out to be Bush's fault and not Obama's, yet using your exact same logic, Clinton and not Bush should have been responsible for 9/11. Also, the anthrax mailings and the shoe bomber were not 'mass casualty' attacks... only one person died from the anthrax mailings, and nobody died from the shoe bomber. Also, please note that for the last 7 years that Bush's 'system' was in place, with the exception of the anthrax mailings and the shoe bomber, there were NO terrorist attacks (or attempted attacks) on US soil.... and in just 11 months since Obama took office, we've had two attacks (or attempted attacks) on US soil, one of them quite deadly, the other potentially very deadly. You can spin for Obama all you like, but everyone else knows who is responsible here, and it sure as heck ain't Bush. Obama needs to man up already and begin to take responsibility instead of whining and pointing to the man who was president nearly one year ago. What an amateur boy-man he is; if you Libs had any brains, you'd be smart enough to be embarrassed for Obama and for yourselves for voting this inexperienced buck-passer as POTUS. Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:20:03 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CTB5BG0#IDComment49540921 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/12/28/monday-open-thread-vacay-edition/#IDComment49316588 I couldn't agree more. Our pitiful press is more interested in fellating Obama 24/7 than doing any reporting on him whatsoever. Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:58:02 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/12/28/monday-open-thread-vacay-edition/#IDComment49316588 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CM5VIO0#IDComment47923995 Dems and Obama only THINK their poll numbers are tanking now... You only THINK we're pissed off now. You ram this down our freakin' throats and you will really see a pissed off electorate. I want them ALL to know, I am so pissed off, I have already asked for Nov 2, 2010 off, so I can stand in line all day long if necessary to cast my vote. And for the first time in my 39 years, my friends are registering to vote cause they are so pissed off, too. Folks who are nearly 40 and never voted are gunning for the elections now. The passion and the anger that these people in Washington have stirred up is unbelievable. 2010 will be just as historic a Dem defeat as 1994 was. You just wait and see. Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:00:00 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CM5VIO0#IDComment47923995 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b906163662d9b06fc3c89eb53b5da4fe.5d1&show_article=1#IDComment47885027 You said it. Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:08:18 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b906163662d9b06fc3c89eb53b5da4fe.5d1&show_article=1#IDComment47885027 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b906163662d9b06fc3c89eb53b5da4fe.5d1&show_article=1#IDComment47872643 lxhobson, Obama IS in fact ready to commit our tax dollars for this global cap and trade fiasco. Just a day or so ago in Copenhagen, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, just promised $100 Billion A YEAR for this charade. Obama knows, however, that only Congress is authorized to spend America's money, and he knows that his administration is already in trouble with US taxpayers for all the reckless spending he's already done. In just 11 months, Obama has tripled the debt left by Bush. Just days ago, Democrats in Congress voted to raise our debt limit from $12.6 trillion to $14 trillion. Obama is not and will never pay attention to the American people unless they are praising him. If he listened to the America people, he wouldn't have passed the stimulus, he wouldn't be pressing this global tax and trade fiasco, and he definitely wouldn't be pushing Obamacare. If you google for any professional poll, you'll see that Americans are against this healthcare bill 57% against/37% favor. And those numbers are only getting worse as we continue to learn just how drastically this bill would affect our lives. Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:08:57 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b906163662d9b06fc3c89eb53b5da4fe.5d1&show_article=1#IDComment47872643 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b906163662d9b06fc3c89eb53b5da4fe.5d1&show_article=1#IDComment47868538 From the article: "Developed nations say that rich countries should pay since they bear the most responsibility for greenhouse gases. But some members of Bush's Republican Party are adamantly opposed to such funding, fearing it would help emerging economic competitors." Typical bias of the liberal media. First of all, they must point out that it's BUSH'S Republican Party, just in case there aren't enough haters out there who despise the Republican Party all on its own merits. And Republicans aren't adamantly opposed to the the funding because it would help emerging economic competitors, where the heck did the author get this garbage from??? I challenge the author to come up with ONE quote from just ONE of BUSH'S Republican Party members stating this idea. The FACT is, Republicans are adamantly opposed to this funding because we see it for exactly what it is: Income redistribution on a global scale. You HATE America for what we've achieved in just 250 years, you are envious of us, and you want our money because your Socialist/Marxists governments are not conducive to the production of wealth. Well hear this, World: Obama and his Democrats in Congress are already taking trillions of dollars out of American taxpayers pockets for income redistribution right here in the USA. In case you haven't heard, in just 11 months Obama has tripled the debt left by Bush. Democrats have just voted to raise our debt limit by $2 Trillion dollars. We are BROKE. We have no money - much less a hundred billion - to give to you so you can spread it around. The US already GIVES $23 BILLION dollars a year to governments all around the world. What more do you greedy people want from us? Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:19:10 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b906163662d9b06fc3c89eb53b5da4fe.5d1&show_article=1#IDComment47868538 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99FO5880#IDComment27484837 The Democrats are ruling as if they will remain in power forever. They should remember this, cause payback sure is a bitch. Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:42:23 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99FO5880#IDComment27484837