en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/438325 Comments by Jeffersoniangal http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114119038 Here is a novel idea, the Obama's are millionaires, make them pay for all the knappy headed kids home internet access. You know how many kids could have internet right now with the amount of money they spent on trips to spain and india??? Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:18:16 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114119038 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114118527 Wait I am confused. Your wife didn't have access to find the role models she needed to succeed, but succeeded anyways? how is that possible? do you even know what you just wrote? Do you have diarrhea of the keyboard or something? None of what you wrote made any sense. Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:15:08 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114118527 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114118070 LMAO!!! Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:12:01 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114118070 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114113409 Jefferson would be proud. Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:40:58 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114113409 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114113030 nope just your average ignorant a-hole that thinks black kids are unfairly singled out and that money descriminates agaist them. Anexio is the typical indoctrinated racist. Besides, tea party is not known for having plants, but the democrats and all there "organizations" are. Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:38:28 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/free-internet-a-civil-right-for-every-nappy-headed-child/#IDComment114113030 http://gazetteonline.com/obits/2010/08/18/hasara-jeffrey-r#IDComment95205014 From our family to yours... condolences. Heavenly Father is now keeping him in His safe, loving arms. Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:42:29 +0000 http://gazetteonline.com/obits/2010/08/18/hasara-jeffrey-r#IDComment95205014 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment85300605 I agree, it would be hard to vote for someone on that issue alone, but if you don't vote at all, or vote third party, you get a democrat and history has shown that over and over and over! The truth of the matter is Whitman is better for california than Brown. You have to pick your poison, democracy is failing us in this aspect, now which would you prefer, death by cyanide, or lead? Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:50:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment85300605 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.e256a1fd9113dd6f76d2f95b4672a379.731&show_article=1#IDComment85299574 How would this show that the airline industry could be fossil fuel free? could a plane like that hold nearly 300 passengers and still fly for any amount of time? Future generations will look back on times like these and say "Wow, our ancestors were complete idiots, its a wonder we still exist!" Much like what we say about cavemen and neanderthals... Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:40:29 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.e256a1fd9113dd6f76d2f95b4672a379.731&show_article=1#IDComment85299574 http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/97767114.html#IDComment85120020 (writing this for the second time because I was censored the first time) it is number one on cnn because those elitist want us to stop celebrating the 4th of July, it's just too dangerous, not to mention archaic and unnecessary! The news media is destroying this country, and it is doing so by obliterating American morale. Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:05:03 +0000 http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/97767114.html#IDComment85120020 http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/97767114.html#IDComment85119741 it number one because they want us to stop celebrating the 4 of July, its just too dangerous, not to mention archaic and unnecessary... the news media is going to destroy this country by murdering morale. Tue, 6 Jul 2010 12:02:16 +0000 http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/97767114.html#IDComment85119741 http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/97767114.html#IDComment85119511 Is it me or is is there just alot of negative stories about the fourth? This is by far the most negative 4 of July I have experienced in my lifetime, and it breaks my heart. Soon we will have people advocating the celebrations to cease and desist from now on, people that hate this country would like nothing better than to see that. I pray I never see the day we stop celebrating the birth of this great nation. Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:59:40 +0000 http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/97767114.html#IDComment85119511 http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/07/01/gop-slams-dems-on-war-bill/#IDComment84062254 BOHICA Fri, 2 Jul 2010 04:31:39 +0000 http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/07/01/gop-slams-dems-on-war-bill/#IDComment84062254 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81462617 the reason they don't go into Whitmans place is because the piece is specifically about Brown, dummy. Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:37:56 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81462617 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81453685 Do you have a brain? you are capable of typing so I guess you possess somewhat of a brain. I think you missed the entire thing, Brown wants California to believe he is living in a tent, you imbicile. Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:44:31 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81453685 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81448044 I'm confused by the track Brown has taken with this... why would how you spend your own money have anything to do with how tax payer money is spent? Even if it did, weathy people have a better track record with being "frugal" and therefore better qualified to financially run things anyways. Just because this loser "chose" to live a less lavish lifestyle, doesn't mean he wanted to, it was politically expediant, and that is all it looks like, nothing more, nothing less. I could care less if he had a 5 story mansion, what I care about are things like, does he want to pass laws like AZ, and is he going to get CA moving in the right direction? if so, he would get my vote. Trouble is, he doesn't believe any of those things and I am no longer a resident of CA! Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:10:43 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81448044 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81446605 Seriously? this is all the left coast dumocrats can come up with? a washed up crusty old politician? One that held office during one of the worst recessions ever? Sounds about right, there is something blissfully ironic about repeating the mistakes of the past, especially one so recent. This loser has a snowballs chance in hell, thanks CA dumocrats for making it so easy for a republican to win in a state that has been blue since the late 1980's Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:00:23 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81446605 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EVNE780&show_article=1#IDComment76974481 It is in my experience that when defeated in a debate a liberal will give up, just like they surrender on everything else. It is only moronic trolls like you that keep trying to stoke the flames. Get a life mscoffy, you pathetic excuse for a human being. Tue, 25 May 2010 00:41:54 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EVNE780&show_article=1#IDComment76974481 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FTDV7O1&show_article=1#IDComment76972856 you are forgetting to factor in that retail price of gasoline does not match price per barrel. They will inflate it as much as possible. Get ready for another recession/depression when gasoline reaches $5-6 per gallon nationwide. Your math is irrelavent to that market as you have no idea how they price this stuff once it's refined. They (OUR congress) have said over and OVER they wanted the price to be that high to stimulate the alternative resource market. You point out that it is so small, so that makes it ok? it's a tax increase! which was not suppose to happen to anyone making less than 250K a year! Tue, 25 May 2010 00:28:00 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FTDV7O1&show_article=1#IDComment76972856 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FTDV7O1&show_article=1#IDComment76971920 No, they think we are the dummies. Tue, 25 May 2010 00:19:21 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FTDV7O1&show_article=1#IDComment76971920 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FTDV7O1&show_article=1#IDComment76971742 Its double talk, he is saying that they will not funnel money into it using money they have confiscated from the citizens of this country, so in one aspect he thinks he can say that with all honesty, but who pays the taxes at the pump? customers, when customers pay those taxes, what does it make them? taxpayers. This is common sense that most of us have that congress thinks we lack, Dismember in November... Tue, 25 May 2010 00:17:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FTDV7O1&show_article=1#IDComment76971742