<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/479840</link>
		<description>Comments by JefJarrett</description>
<item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Quote: Murphy is Fine, Focused on Peavy</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/quote-murphy-is-fine-focused-on-peavy/#IDComment18853776</link>
<description>I think Castillo has been pretty good this year.....I&amp;#039;m not ready to write him off just yet. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/quote-murphy-is-fine-focused-on-peavy/#IDComment18853776</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Quote: Murphy is Fine, Focused on Peavy</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/quote-murphy-is-fine-focused-on-peavy/#IDComment18853645</link>
<description>Fair assessment.  He is better at his hitting than his D so I&amp;#039;d imagine I&amp;#039;d obsess more over the thing I&amp;#039;m better at too. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/quote-murphy-is-fine-focused-on-peavy/#IDComment18853645</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Quote: Murphy is Fine, Focused on Peavy</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/quote-murphy-is-fine-focused-on-peavy/#IDComment18852882</link>
<description>I am excited to see how Murphy continues to develop, but is anyone else worried about his obsession with hitting?  Granted, a good hitting outfielder will allow people to overlook defensive shortcomings, but we&amp;#039;re not talking Manny Rameriez here....we&amp;#039;re talking Daniel Murphy.  Maybe a few less hours in the batting cages and some more working with Razor Shines in the outfield would do him good.  Just a thought. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/quote-murphy-is-fine-focused-on-peavy/#IDComment18852882</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Opinion: Day 1 in Citi Field</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/14/opinion-day-1-in-citi-field/#IDComment18736671</link>
<description>While I agree 100% that it does seem silly to complain about this beautiful new ballpark (I&amp;#039;ve only seen it on TV so far)....if this is true about the obstructed views....and I don&amp;#039;t mean just the corners...I mean large chunks of the OF like the posters above pointed out....that is ridiculous.  I&amp;#039;m going on Saturday, so I&amp;#039;ll be able to see for myself. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/14/opinion-day-1-in-citi-field/#IDComment18736671</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Note: Castillo&#039;s Sac-Bunt</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/note-castillos-sac-bunt/#IDComment18673435</link>
<description>Well, I wouldn&amp;#039;t go as far as you go with the negative commentary about the site, but I do agree with disagreeing with Matt&amp;#039;s take.  Castillo took a risk....technically it is not the right play....but nothing was working off of Johnson yesterday - the 3b was playing back and was an inexperienced 3b at that (according to the Marlins announcers, anyway).  If you get on, now you have 1st and 3rd, 1 out and a pinch hitter coming up.  I have no problem with that play.  Murph....not only did he drop the ball, he broke in 2-3 steps before scampering back.  This game is on Murph in the field, and the offense collectively not hitting a lick. It was nice however to see a 2hour game...... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/note-castillos-sac-bunt/#IDComment18673435</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Note: Castillo&#039;s Sac-Bunt</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/note-castillos-sac-bunt/#IDComment18673226</link>
<description>Apparently Shef was getting good ovations at the open workout the team did before the season began.  I don&amp;#039;t know about him being boo&amp;#039;d.  Ollie on the other hand.........might as well be Heilman...he is going to get an earful. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/note-castillos-sac-bunt/#IDComment18673226</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Post-Game: Mets 4 Red Sox 3</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/post-game-mets-4-red-sox-3/#IDComment18156948</link>
<description>It works fine on my iPod touch, but I think the two devices use different browsers to access sites.  Maybe e-mailing Cerrone?  Good luck! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/post-game-mets-4-red-sox-3/#IDComment18156948</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Random: Different View on TV</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/random-different-view-on-tv/#IDComment18129875</link>
<description>Oh yeah, and it just jumps out at you.  And the wall is lit up because there is a scoreboard of some sort on it.  Man, its ugly.....lol </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/random-different-view-on-tv/#IDComment18129875</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Random: Different View on TV</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/random-different-view-on-tv/#IDComment18129104</link>
<description>It really is......I don&amp;#039;t know if it because it&amp;#039;s a Yankee thing.....but when they panned after Cano&amp;#039;s HR ball...which Kay was WAYYY too exited about...I was thinking - this is one ugly stadium. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Apr 2009 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/random-different-view-on-tv/#IDComment18129104</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Random: Different View on TV</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/random-different-view-on-tv/#IDComment18128706</link>
<description>Oh and in regards to this post...yes, it did look different - but good.  The park looks GREAT.  I flipped over to MLB Network, and I don&amp;#039;t like the new Yankee Stadium at all.  That oversized scoreboard/video screen in CF looks so outta place. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Apr 2009 00:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/random-different-view-on-tv/#IDComment18128706</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Random: Different View on TV</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/random-different-view-on-tv/#IDComment18128676</link>
<description>Anyone see this from the article about Shef from Mets.com?  &amp;quot;Sheffield will play right field on what Manuel hopes will be a regular basis, potentially supplanting Ryan Church for the starting job.&amp;quot;  Think the Mets have bigger plans for him than they were letting on?? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Apr 2009 00:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/random-different-view-on-tv/#IDComment18128676</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Results: Under-Overs for 2009</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/results-under-overs-for-2009/#IDComment18090712</link>
<description>Oh, good catch.  I never started receiving the e-mails you were getting - so maybe that is the default if you get a notification to your comment?  I really do like this new comment section, btw!!! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/results-under-overs-for-2009/#IDComment18090712</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Results: Under-Overs for 2009</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/results-under-overs-for-2009/#IDComment18089896</link>
<description>I used to like Rosenthal when all he did was write......I thought he always did a good job a that and breaking some stories.  Now Fox puts a camera in front of him, and I don&amp;#039;t know if it is his speech pattern or what....but I can&amp;#039;t stand the guy! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/results-under-overs-for-2009/#IDComment18089896</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Results: Under-Overs for 2009</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/results-under-overs-for-2009/#IDComment18089802</link>
<description>Paulaecinc,  Wright will be on right after Church and Chris Russo. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/results-under-overs-for-2009/#IDComment18089802</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Results: Under-Overs for 2009</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/results-under-overs-for-2009/#IDComment18089768</link>
<description>VCarver,  How&amp;#039;s it going!  I think if you go into your profile for your account, you can select your e-mail preferences.  I unclicked the e-mail options, and haven&amp;#039;t gotten one yet. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/results-under-overs-for-2009/#IDComment18089768</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Buzz: Mets Discussing Sheffield</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18085142</link>
<description>Initially, I scream NO WAY when I think of Gary Sheffield on the Mets.  Then I think.....he certainly isn&amp;#039;t going to start with the Phillies......is he going to start with the Reds?  It doesn&amp;#039;t seem like there are starter jobs out there for them so he has no choice but to conform and be a role player.  When right.....and that should be the debate (I don&amp;#039;t think he is)......he is a right handed power threat at the plate, and I would love him coming off the bench as opposed to a Marlon Anderson.  If he misbehaves even slightly, you cut him....I believe he will only cost the league minimum anyway.    But....then again, I&amp;#039;m sure there is a reason why he is even available at this point.....And it is a combination of everyones&amp;#039; fears here......nothing left, and bad attitude. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18085142</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Note: New Design and Comments Section</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/note-new-design-and-comments-section/#IDComment18081533</link>
<description>Matt, this new site layout is great!  I also love how the users can moderate themselves - I would imagine this blog will soon return to the great conversation it had when it was first starting up now that we can filter the trolls off this site. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/note-new-design-and-comments-section/#IDComment18081533</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>