gdp's Comments

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 02:51:15 +0000

WITCHCRAFT - - - IT'S OFFICIAL, TODAY I BOUGHT MY HOUSE FROM A FEMINIST WITCH. It's like a kid in a candy store. Our first task for our family is to burn all her witchcraft idols and objects in the front yard. A big bond fire. I love it when the good guys can take back the things of the wicked and claim them for Christ. It's too much fun. I think my 3 year old daughter will throw the first evil thing in the fire. She's so excited to do this. And guess what. I did not even have to ask. But she volunteered the info. She told me: 1) She hates Republicans 2) Loves Obama 3) Loves Evolution 4) Hates McCain 5) Hates Christianity 6) A Political Liberal and Hardcore Progressive Deductively speaking as I have argued before, I knew ALL of this before she ever told me. It's beautiful to see my arguments via the theorectial so obvious in the practical. I knew this before she even opened her mouth. Know your enemy. And then go buy their house. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 02:45:28 +0000

Hi Dave, On O'Reilly's own show, he gave equally the option that God may be a man or a Woman. This was in passing. The more you peel away O'Reilly's pagan theology, the more justification and understanding it becomes to his luke-warm political spectrum. Did you see his conversation with Glenn Beck yesterday. Even Beck was shaking his head at the guy. DIck Morris was doing the same on today's show. I do not know his heart, but his words are his words. He is luke warm in the political arena, but he is a down right heretic in the theological arena thus making his politics skate on thin ice. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 02:33:36 +0000

GOD MIGHT BE A WOMAN? ? ? ? ------ THIS IS WHAT BILL O'REILLY SAID ------ I believe it was last week that Bill O'Reilly said on his show that God might be a woman. He may be a man too, he gave this as a possibility, but equally is possible according to O'Reilly God might be a Woman. The Black Liberal on his show on another occasion I believe (Dr. Hill?) told Bill quote. "Welcome to the Left." Are you telling me that a person's theology has no bearing on their politics. This has been my point from the beginning. Bill O'Reilly claims to be Roman Catholic, and also is extremely Liberal theologically speaking. Now, even if we didn't know anything about O'Reilly, via his extremely pagan theology of Feminism, we would expect to see his politics wicked and liberal on some points. And boy, do we ever. Is O'Reilly a Witch? What's going on here? Somebody needs to take this luke-warm wannabe out of commission. QUESTION: = If a person thinks God is or may be a woman, does this have ANY bearing on how they funnel their worldview regarding politics? And if so, how? Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Tea Parties

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:27:55 +0000

Hi Conservatarian, I'm trying to be helpful. Sometimes passions trumps logic and if it happens in this case, your goals will fail. One should never stop thinking. All actions should continually reviewed and tested in the process. Thus your tense issue is a logical fallacy of passion over logic. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Tea Parties

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:35:39 +0000

Hi Conservatarian, You said: "People in Nevada, California and other states are in position to do this--not thinking about it" This is disturbing. To think before one acts. Essentially this is impossible unless you are possessed by demons or something. One has to think before they act. The question is how much thinking and if the thinking corresponds to the reality of what is right and wrong. If the right and wrong is the OUGHT verses the IS. I would ask that you put more thought in the method of approach of the actions that follows. Actions flows from and away from its base and the base is ideas while the actions flow from the ideas. I am currently setting myself to run for office. I stated that a while ago. If you simply ACT without thought, the enemy will beat you down and your well intentioned purpose to take back this country will NOT STICK, and will fade away when the arguments made for this country are seen as extremely unsound, though possibly valid. No need to fix something that is not broken. So if the Platform is Conservative, then you need to hold phonies accountable to this standard instead of making a brand new document that future Republicans or Conservatives won't follow just like the Platform. A circle will happen. So think and act on accountability if indeed you are stubborn and do make a new document. You are shooting yourself in the foot and not fixing the problem. That being accountability. Though I will pray that your thoughts will correspond to your actions of what a Conservative is according to the Platform and according to the Holy Scriptures. Do not give an enemy a chance to kill you intellectually. In all your conduct of thought and deed, make it correspond to the reality of ethics, truth, and justice. For that is truly what a politician should stand for. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Tea Parties

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:14:18 +0000

Hi Conservatarian - - - Sloppy verses Logically The choice it taking the Country back logically and correctly, or via the means of absurdity. If you want to take the country back and make it STICK, then you must be sound in all areas of method and understanding. Have you read the Republican Platform? Is this not Conservative? Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Tea Parties

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:11:34 +0000

THE PRECINCT TACTIC GIVES VICTORY TO THE ENEMY - THE REPUBLICAN PLATFORM (AN APOLOGETIC) - Nobody talks about or discusses the Republican Platform. Have you read the Platform Conservatarian? You need to do this. The Precinct Tactic is not actually correct. The Republican position, if followed CONSISTENTLY in reference to the Republican Platform (http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/) would be extremely close to what a Conservative ought to be. Virtually zero Republicans adhere to or follow the Platform consistently, thus making them FAKE Republicans. Though there are an extreme few. So it's not taking a party OVER to replace old concepts with new concepts. It's breaking the door down and finding the chaff among the wheat, and burning the chaff so the wheat stands. It's blowing the enemy of stealth OVER Conservative lines to eat at conservative concepts like Termites starving for wood as a means of strategy and deception. The enemy is on the same side in the battle manipulating the Republicans to redefine their terms on a practical scale. I challenge you to find me 10 Republicans on the Hill that adhere to the Platform on a consistent level. This you cannot do. It's simply not the case. So rather then attempting the precinct tactic (which is false and gives credence to the enemy and our defeat), we need to burn the double agents and stealth spies at the stake intellectually, and shame them with some old fashion Reductio Ad Absurdum. The goal is worthwhile, but this allows victory for the enemy. We need to blow the enemies boat right out of the water by taking back the principles of Conservative values outlined in the Republican Platform which is virtually never mentioned or discussed. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:56:31 +0000

HI Dave, I was right after all. Gates was the racist and the cops were NOT. Gates used the logical fallacy of equivocation in regards to the term Racism while the Cops were more conservative in their approach. I know how these liberals think, especially black liberals (99% of them). Clarance Thomas would be one of those rare wonderful Conservatives that the black community hates. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:20:36 +0000

Hi Conseratarian, This is extremely good. Reclaim the Party back to the Conservative concept within the Republican term. If Republicans today were simply consistent within the Republican "Platform," we would be much more conservative on the Hill. Have you read the Republican "Platform." Is this not predominately conservative? The Platform is wrong about Islam, but is mainly conservative as a whole. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:01:19 +0000

Hi HerbalRemedy, So Mote It Be ! ! ! "Do What Thou Wilt Is The Whole Of The Law, Love Under Will, Love Under Law." Alister Crowley - Book of Thelma IV. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:06:30 +0000

Hi HerbalRemedy, - - - WITCHCRAFT AND POLITICS Witchcraft is nothing more then a hybrid of feminism and liberalism. This is always the case. I was not talking about you. There is another I believe her name is Terry, my other sweet Fabian Friend. But if you are a Witch, then how is it that you have 78 points? If you are a Witch, you are not claiming to be Conservative? You must claim to be liberal. But Witches can't really be trusted anyway. Unless you throw some water on them. If you are really a Witch, are you a puny dabbler (Solitary Witch) or are you hardcore? Have you gone through the 3 degrees of Witchcraft? Have you studied the Green Man or Murray's work? Ever heard of Raymond Buckland, Sanders, or Gardner? What type do you practice? Are you a LaVeyian Witch? LaVey wrote a book on Witchcraft, did you know that? How has Witchcraft influenced your philosophy of politics? I'm sure all would be interested. Since you like the Green Bud, are you one with the Jah? Is Lucifer the god of the rainbow? What about the Stag god? Or are you high and simply "trolling" reality which isn't so my liberal feminists friend. Though it would be said, that if a liberal would become a Witch, he would be much more consistent in his political worldview. Yes, men are called Witches too. Wicca (the term) was invented in the 1950s. Raymond Buckland calls himself a Witch and sometimes a Wiccan. It depends on what he feels like calling himself that day. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:44:30 +0000

Hi Dave, I got the info about some of the elements of the police report from Megan Kelley's show the other day. I had thought she had received some general info about the profanity of Gates towards the police since her analysis of it via the standard of the law. But you're right, as to the specific profanity, I don't believe that has been released yet. It's still somewhat de jure, but Meagan Kelley and others upon receiving the specifics will hopefully bring the case down to de facto where it needs to be. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:07:46 +0000

THE MAJORITY OF BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICAN HAVE AN INFERIOR CULTURE OF EVIL What happen? My post deleted again? Again, culture has nothing to do with race or pigmentation. Instead of deleting my comment, allow it to be challenged. This has nothing to do with race. I have absolutely no idea why they deleted my post? What's going on? Hi Dave, You may be right for I wasn't there. But as a whole in relation to how this subject of racism is viewed within ambiguity, I believe most have not been able to discern the color of the skin verses the culture of the society within various groups. According to the polices report, Gates was yelling at the Police with profane language. The Police need to handle FORENSIC situations by taking actions to not allow them to happen (even if they are mistaken). Since most blacks are from a very evil and nasty culture, then this is what we would expect the police to do. But this is according to the Police. Gates has another story. So if we go with Gates, we are essentially calling the police liars. I'm not about to do that and would give the Police the benefit of the doubt verses a pagan black man that adheres to an inferior and dangerous culture of Black Liberation Theology. But again Dave, I wasn't there, so I could be wrong. But I doubt it. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:00:39 +0000

Hi lonewolf, America as a whole use to have education as a priority, but in function and definition. In the 40s and 50s, traces of CLASSICAL education were taught in Public Schools. More so in the 19th century. But since we live in an era of post modernism (aka, the death of philosophy), Classical Education has been substituted for a pluralistic education. Classical Education is a synonym for Christian education. My 3 year old daughter decided to tell the neighboring pagan children about Jesus. She picked out a dress, and gave them bibles. She even wrote a song about Jesus. Education is not just in the classroom, it's all of life. And that is not understood anymore which leads to the cultural problems America now has today. It was nice hearing from you. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:13:08 +0000

ONE MORE THING It would be interesting if Glenn Beck interviewed a scum like Sharpton or Jesse Jackson and asked some of these tough questions. Somebody needs to do it. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:11:25 +0000

Hi Dave and lonewolf, Haven't heard from you guys in a while. I hope you guys are continuing to fight the good fight. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:33:04 +0000

Hi Bobstuckey, I'm glad that you're on the logical side now. We evidently started as enemies and are now allys. That is encouraging since most others hate me. What caused the change in thought? "It is not the World against me, but I against the World" (Athanasius) Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:26:17 +0000

Hi RandomOrder, I tend to be negative about Satan. I believe he is evil and view him as an ass (democrat?) How about Child molestation? - are you positive about this? How about rape? Your attempt at reason is some sort of random order : ) Not really, for this is a logical contradiction to those who are intelligent. But wait,even your blog name is a logical contradiction. Random order cannot coincide. It's like saying a godly demon or a righteous rapist. Via the law of contradiction, anything good claim which is positive also has a negative side since evil exists. Perhaps you don't believe in evil like the hippies once did? Your name demonstrates that you are of the same mind of a man who thinks his one hand is clapping. Lay off the MTv my friend. How on earth do you have 42 points? Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:10:01 +0000

Hi C_Marie, - - - EXPERIENCE (EMPIRICISM) LEADS TO IGNORANCE AND SIN ! ! ! A fair question. Let me try to help you. Experienced in reference to knowledge is known as empiricism. That being knowledge obtained by our 5 senses. But the Bible says Empiricism is wrong and demonstrates its failure and sin. Here are some examples: In Luke 16:27-31 = we see the rich man and Lazarus. Via this parable, after Lazarus EXPERIENCES hell (Hades), and the extreme torment and torture, he asks to warn his family: v. 27-28 =And he said, 'Then I beg you, father, that you send him to my father's house-- for I have five brothers--in order that he may )warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.' Read what the answer is. He pleads with Father Abraham that if he were to go to his brother and relay his EXPERIENCE they would repent, but verse 31 says: "But he said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.'" Dozens of other examples exist. I Corinthians 2:9-10 John 20:29 (blessed are those that believe and do not see) Luke 16:13-33 That which gives us KNOWLEDGE according to Christianity is revelation. When God reveals it to us. When the two men walked with Jesus on the Road to Emmaus, they did not empirically recognize Jesus. They should have been able to according to empiricism. But what caused them to understand? Was it there experience? Jesus even showed them his hands and feet empirically speaking and they still didn't get it (Luke 24:37-39). They did not understand until? Verse 45 tells us: Luke 24:45 "Then He [Jesus Christ] opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures." You see, it is not our experience that gives us understanding but rather the Revelation from God as a gift. So while experience is needed for one to carry out knowledge and understanding, experience itself is NOT the means OF that knowledge and understanding. Not to mention the philosophical inconsistently of empiricism on its own claim. It is impossible to know even by empirical claims internally. But for that, another post would be required. Think on this if you wish to be consistent in your creed. "in whom [Jesus] are hidden """ALL"""" the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. " (Colossians 2:3) Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Vent

Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:51:05 +0000

Hi RandomOrder, You are very negative about my negativity thus making you a hypocrite. If you are so positive, then you should be positive about my negativity. Thus you have entered into the logical fallacy of contradiction. The Bible tells us to judge righteously (John 7:24) and not as a hypocrite (Matthew 7:1-7). Thus not only is your analysis flawed via Biblical analysis, but also via logic consistency. Are you positive about Satan and evil? What about Child Molestation? I'm always negative about Child molestation and thus Mormonism and other cults as well. Thus making me positive about goodness. Respectfully, Jean Chauvin (Jude 3). Positive about the Jesus, Negative about Evil Since 1989