<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/762423</link>
		<description>Comments by JasonZ</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Top 25 Left-Wing Films: #25 - &#039;The Day After Tomorrow&#039; (2004)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/12/13/top-25-left-wing-films-25-the-day-after-tomorrow-2004/#IDComment115538618</link>
<description>    &amp;quot;It is the only movie ever made in which the title character does not appear.&amp;quot;  Rebecca  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032976/),&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;(http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032976/),&lt;/a&gt; just off the top of my head.  And although it doesn&amp;#039;t improve the quality of the movie, the title character does appear in Godzilla. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/12/13/top-25-left-wing-films-25-the-day-after-tomorrow-2004/#IDComment115538618</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood Feminism: Sexuality and Integrity Are Not Mutually Exclusive </title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lalexander/2010/09/17/hollywood-feminism-sexuality-and-integrity-are-not-mutually-exclusive/#IDComment99396522</link>
<description>&amp;quot;When Janet Jackson&amp;rsquo;s wardrobe malfunction became this country&amp;rsquo;s most talked about crisis, I thought we were being punked&amp;hellip;until I realized that people were seriously offended. And that&amp;rsquo;s their right&amp;hellip; but really?&amp;quot;  If you really think what happened was a &amp;quot;wardrobe malfunction,&amp;quot; you&amp;#039;re very naive or you&amp;#039;re lying to yourself.  That was a planned event.  What offended me about it was not the nudity, but rather the blatant disregard for well-known legal and cultural boundaries.  Speaking only for myself, I&amp;#039;m not outraged about it, but very displeased because the importance of it was that a line was blatantly crossed and demanded a legal response.  Not doing so would encourage others to try different tacks, and not just involving nudity or sexuality;  religion, political philosophy, race, economics -- anything people argue about, really -- could be injected into what&amp;#039;s supposed to be just a concert!  Just think about any awards show.  In general, I found this whole article to be very judgmental.  It started with a lecture and continued with denigrations of everyone whose opinion differs from the author&amp;#039;s.  For example, referring to the female starlets, &amp;quot;society girls,&amp;quot; etc.:   &amp;quot;But I&amp;rsquo;m less offended by their sluttiness and blatant sexuality; I&amp;rsquo;m offended because they are just straight out dumb.&amp;quot;  Even if you think someone&amp;#039;s dumb, is that really something to be offended about?  Also, referring to the TV producer of reality shows:  &amp;quot;Sure he was a scumbag...&amp;quot;  He was explaining why  the show that the author would like to see wouldn&amp;#039;t make money -- and the author agreed! -- but that still makes him a scumbag.  Right.  Finally, there&amp;#039;s this:  &amp;quot;...but I think a hot woman should be able to wear a mini skirt without having her professionalism or accomplishments questioned. If I had the legs, I&amp;rsquo;d wear one every day. &amp;quot;  Some places are not appropriate for displays of hotness: a company board meeting, testifying in court, a funeral; all these places would be totally inappropriate for that.  Reading the article, I&amp;#039;m not sure the author gets that.  Behavior that&amp;#039;s inappropriate for the venue is an excellent reason to question a person&amp;#039;s professionalism or accomplishments, because they bring into question that person&amp;#039;s judgment.  What I got from this article was that if you don&amp;#039;t have the same values and beliefs as the author, the only explanation she can think of is that there&amp;#039;s something wrong with you. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lalexander/2010/09/17/hollywood-feminism-sexuality-and-integrity-are-not-mutually-exclusive/#IDComment99396522</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Top 10 Most Overrated Directors of All Time</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2010/01/17/top-10-most-overrated-directors-of-all-time/#IDComment52521421</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re right about most, especially Tarantino and Scorsese, but you&amp;#039;re way off on Aronofsky.  I was glad to see that John Huston was not on your list, and shocked that John Hughes was not! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2010/01/17/top-10-most-overrated-directors-of-all-time/#IDComment52521421</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>