en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1087049 Comments by JamesRWII http://tv.breitbart.com/gov-pawlenty-federal-govt-like-drug-dealer/#IDComment96854181 I always have a hard time deciding whether a right wing fascist is worse than a left wing pinko like you. It's pretty much neck and neck. Pawlenty makes a good point. Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:43:34 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/gov-pawlenty-federal-govt-like-drug-dealer/#IDComment96854181 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77642676 In response to "what else could it be?" I would contend that it is a chicken egg with the potential to become a chicken. If I don't decide to use it to sustain myself or other chickens first that is. I would also suggest that a chicken egg is not a chicken until it starts to take on chicken like qualities like a beak, head, legs, nervous system. At that point a person is becoming as well. All matter has the potential to become energy but until it does it is just matter. Lamenting lost potential serves no purpose. Sat, 29 May 2010 16:26:14 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77642676 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77562728 This I can agree with. Fri, 28 May 2010 23:28:47 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77562728 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77562495 Would you consider a fertilized chicken egg a chicken? Certainly it has the potential to become a chicken but I wouldn't say it IS a chicken. Fri, 28 May 2010 23:26:17 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77562495 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77562099 A slave is a sentient being so it's not exactly the same thing. An embryo has no nerve tissue and no nervous system (at least during the stages being discussed here). I do not wish to be insensitive to your opinion but perhaps we should stick to the topic at hand. Fri, 28 May 2010 23:24:05 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77562099 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77512893 I can see you have thought out your position and I solute your consistency and convictions, sir. My opinion varies from yours but I respect your right to it and I thank you for taking the time to respond. Fri, 28 May 2010 17:05:17 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77512893 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77509134 I'm just curious here and I hope I don't offend but are you suggesting that fertility treatments be outlawed? These are not abortions the article is talking about. Fri, 28 May 2010 16:31:03 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77509134 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77508226 When fertility treatments are done, they take more eggs than they need for the procedure to ensure a healthy selection is available. These extra fertilized eggs can be frozen for a limited amount of time before they are considered non-viable and must be disposed of. Fertility treatments offer many people a chance at having a child were otherwise there would be none. At the point in time where the embryos become medical waste, the question becomes do we use the material or do we throw it away. There is no 3rd option. If you are against using the material you are in effect in favor of throwing it in the trash. Fri, 28 May 2010 16:23:33 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0648a56e07bd726aca5687bec87a9ba3.a81&show_article=1#IDComment77508226 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&show_article=1#IDComment77380544 That is the point I was trying to make. People run around in a residential area with their head up their posterior with no regard for children or animals that often happen into the roadway in these areas specifically. My money is on cell phone radio or speeding or all of these combined. I find it hard to believe that, if someone was abiding by the speed limit and paying attention, they would have trouble stopping before striking anything in an area such as this. Thu, 27 May 2010 21:12:46 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&show_article=1#IDComment77380544 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&show_article=1#IDComment77379255 So did you pay for the damage to the SUV? Clearly we need child leash laws. Thu, 27 May 2010 21:00:55 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&show_article=1#IDComment77379255 http://bigjournalism.com/acary/2010/05/21/d-c-metro-police-escorted-seiu-protesters-to-greg-baers-home/#IDComment76594682 This is the way I do it already. Then again, I'm hard headed and not the type to ask for help. Unfortunately that doesn't stop them from trying to "help" me every chance they get. Like IDing me on my own porch for "Not checking my mail". Thats what I need . . . an armed stranger on my property to remind me to check my mail . . . or else. I'm lucky he didn't shoot my dog . . . Sat, 22 May 2010 00:49:35 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/acary/2010/05/21/d-c-metro-police-escorted-seiu-protesters-to-greg-baers-home/#IDComment76594682 http://bigjournalism.com/acary/2010/05/21/d-c-metro-police-escorted-seiu-protesters-to-greg-baers-home/#IDComment76588674 You are mistaken. They are not legally required to stop any crime. They often do but you can't require them to put their a$$ on the line to protect a civilian. Most (not all) wouldn't poke their heads out from behind a brick wall to stop a gunman killing preschoolers. Protect and Serve has become a slogan and nothing more. The current militarization of police all around the country has become a violation of The Posse Comitatus Act IMO. Draw your own conclusions. Sat, 22 May 2010 00:09:14 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/acary/2010/05/21/d-c-metro-police-escorted-seiu-protesters-to-greg-baers-home/#IDComment76588674 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FLDPRO0&show_article=1#IDComment75139838 Since when have we Americans been expected to bow submissively to authority and speak with awe and reverence to those who represent us? William O. Douglas Respect goes both ways. I do not respect a thug with a badge and a gun because they require it of me . . . it takes more than the threat of a ticket, a beating, or jail to earn my respect. If an officer has a cussing coming I'm sure as hell going to give it to them. I would happily take time from my life and money from my account to fight any ticket that resulted. Wed, 12 May 2010 21:44:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FLDPRO0&show_article=1#IDComment75139838