371 comments posted · 1 followers · following 1
You have clearly not bothered to read my actual argument if that laughable strawman is how you characterise it. I am saying that every time you have sex you are consenting to the risk of creating a human life. You can clearly have sex without the express goal of conceiving, you just need to accept that it can happen and that chemically poisoning your child is not a legitimate 'solution'. I never mentioned rape so you can keep your slanderous assertions to yourself.
Where you derive the lie that I am placing all responsibility on the woman from, I don't know. It is my responsibility as a man not to have sex until I am ready to support a child. I haven't, and will remain a virgin until I am married, partly for that reason.
How you have the audacity to claim to care about children who will be abused is beyond me, when you are quite literally calling for these same children to be killed in the womb. There could be nothing more abusive than ending their lives, which you are actively supporting. You are a cheerleader to their abuse. How contorted your worldview must be! If a child is born to abusive parents, they should be taken into care and raised by loving adoptive parents, quite obviously. I don't think for a second you truly believe that death is a better outcome for these poor babies than that. Be honest, this is about your recreation being unhindered, pure and simple.
Abortion is murder and you well know it.
As for your last sentence, I'll take it seriously when you can look a person who suffered neglect in their childhood in the eye and tell them it would have been better for them if they'd never been born.
There should not be a 'right' to getting your leg over with no consequences when that requires snuffing out a human life. There is nothing more selfish than to prioritise your recreation over the life of another.
Please go away.
This sort of guff is why libertarianism is just as ideologically straightjacketed and unworkable as socialism.