<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/333321</link>
		<description>Comments by JWnTX</description>
<item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : No Wonder Obama Can’t Move the Needle</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/08/24/no-wonder-obama-cant-move-the-needle/#IDComment428723411</link>
<description>And the MSM has worked overtime to make sure they never learn.  That&amp;#039;s why they&amp;#039;ve limited the conventions to 3 hours.  The worst thing they could do is allow Americans to view Romney and Ryan at the convention and let them see that they don&amp;#039;t have blood-soaked fangs and sleep in coffins during the day.  The Obama campaign is a joke--by necessity, not by choice--because it doesn&amp;#039;t have even a smidgen of success to point to.  It&amp;#039;s 100% based on negative ads trying to create a narrative that&amp;#039;s just as easily countered in Romney ads.  Obama is an abject failure at everything but mudslinging and his political career is finally coming to an end.  The only issue is that he&amp;#039;s left us with 5X the mess that the Democrats created during George Bush&amp;#039;s last two years. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/08/24/no-wonder-obama-cant-move-the-needle/#IDComment428723411</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Longmont Times-Call : Fracking ban will go to ballot City clerk: Petition has more than enough signatures - Longmont Times</title>
<link>http://www.timescall.com/news/longmont-local-news/ci_21260176/fracking-ban-will-go-ballot-city-clerk-petition?source=most_emailed#IDComment419321031</link>
<description>What kind of idiots believe this anti-fracking propaganda?  Yes, I&amp;#039;m sure the &amp;quot;Our Longmont&amp;quot; bunch doesn&amp;#039;t want the election &amp;quot;confused&amp;quot; with anything like facts or truth.  Allow their propaganda to stand unchallenged so they can lie and mislead the people in the name of radical environmentalism that has no basis in science or reality.  Don&amp;#039;t interfere with their chasing of unicorns in the name of Gaia.  Pathetic.  The City Council should force this group to support their lies with something besides excerpts from &amp;quot;Gasland,&amp;quot; the fictional movie they all promote.  And the enviros try to claim the mantel of &amp;quot;science&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;rational thought?&amp;quot;  They should be laughed off the stage of rational discourse. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.timescall.com/news/longmont-local-news/ci_21260176/fracking-ban-will-go-ballot-city-clerk-petition?source=most_emailed#IDComment419321031</guid>
</item><item>
<title>YOLOHUB : 70 Facts President Obama Doesn&#039;t Want You To Know</title>
<link>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387956403</link>
<description>Wow--that&amp;#039;s some seriously selective recollection there, Cindy.  So tell me--what would happen to all those soldiers we throw out onto the street when we &amp;quot;end all military participation?&amp;quot;  And what do we do when we use all American labor and nobody in the world--including us--can afford the products we produce?  And I&amp;#039;m sure you&amp;#039;re in constant contact with your representatives and they don&amp;#039;t listen--because you&amp;#039;re a 24k nut. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387956403</guid>
</item><item>
<title>YOLOHUB : 70 Facts President Obama Doesn&#039;t Want You To Know</title>
<link>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387954844</link>
<description>Exactly purplewings123.  Since Obama&amp;#039;s gone rogue, what difference does Congress make?  He definitely owns EVERYTHING now.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387954844</guid>
</item><item>
<title>YOLOHUB : 70 Facts President Obama Doesn&#039;t Want You To Know</title>
<link>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387952044</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s just stupid.  I don&amp;#039;t know what McCain and Palin would have done, but I can tell you what they wouldn&amp;#039;t have done--and that&amp;#039;s increase regulation of business in this country twofold.  They wouldn&amp;#039;t have threatened industries with driving them into bankruptcy and worked to destroy jobs in industries they didn&amp;#039;t personally care for.  They wouldn&amp;#039;t have allowed the Bush tax cuts to hang over the head of business like the Sword of Damocles, wondering from one day to the next whether the capital gains tax is going to double overnight.  And they wouldn&amp;#039;t have engaged in politicizing virtually every agency and department  in government with ideologues who put their nutty ideas above the welfare of America and Americans. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387952044</guid>
</item><item>
<title>YOLOHUB : 70 Facts President Obama Doesn&#039;t Want You To Know</title>
<link>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387949677</link>
<description>Are you seriously posting this widely--I mean WIDELY--discredited bunch of hooey?  You should be banned forever for spreading ignorance. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387949677</guid>
</item><item>
<title>YOLOHUB : 70 Facts President Obama Doesn&#039;t Want You To Know</title>
<link>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387948297</link>
<description>There was no &amp;quot;budget surplus&amp;quot; when Bush came into office--it was a projected surplus.  The debt was still over $5 trillion.  He doubled that, true enough.  With 9-11 (which according to the so-called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; was every bit as devastating as the subprime mortgage debacle), one major conflict and one minor conflict (both of which were won and are now in the process of being lost by Obama--no surprise there), the voluntary surrender of Libya&amp;#039;s WMD program (which Obama then showed his gratitude for by overthrowing Gaddafi anyway), an average unemployment of rate of &amp;lt;5% (hasn&amp;#039;t been below 8% since Obama took office), and calling--repeatedly--for increased regulation of the GSE&amp;#039;s (which Barney Frank and Chris Dodd ridiculed as unnecessary), Bush was a better president by a magnitude of about 1000 when compared to the incompetent naif currently inhabiting the White House. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.yolohub.com/economy/70-facts-president-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-know#IDComment387948297</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Heritage Foundry : The Bizarre White House Reaction to John Bryson News</title>
<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/06/12/the-bizarre-white-house-reaction-to-john-bryson-news/#IDComment380889371</link>
<description>Glad to--GWBush said that he would protect America and Americans from another terrorist attack.  Said he would pass policies to pull us out of two recessions.  Support our allies and work to destroy our enemies.  Reduce the deficit by half before he left office ($400 billion to $160 billion--until the Democrats got to town in 2006).  He didn&amp;#039;t arm drug cartels in Mexico.  He didn&amp;#039;t have any tax cheats.  You see--Republicans are held to a different standard than Democrats.  We know ALL the dirt on Republicans--the only dirt we get on Dems is that which is so egregious, so outrageous, that even their friends in the press are too embarrassed to cover up.  Pretend that the Bush Administration was just as corrupt as this one if that fantasy makes you feel better.  But it wasn&amp;#039;t--by any stretch. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/06/12/the-bizarre-white-house-reaction-to-john-bryson-news/#IDComment380889371</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Joan Walsh: Dissent Not Permitted At Salon?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2012/02/27/joan-walsh-dissent-not-permitted-at-salon/#IDComment303361891</link>
<description>Hey joedoakes--I was talking about &amp;quot;that viscous racist&amp;quot; (actually as sarcasm related to the poor ESPN fellow that came up with that unfortunate headline about Lin).  Anyway, the board I was using wouldn&amp;#039;t let me change the thread title and I&amp;#039;ve been trying to live that down for about a week now.  Happens to the best of us.  Guarantee you one thing, though--I will never misspell &amp;quot;vicious&amp;quot; again in my life. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2012/02/27/joan-walsh-dissent-not-permitted-at-salon/#IDComment303361891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Davos elites to seek reforms of \&#039;outdated\&#039; capitalism</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.be33fda73987ff722e71ca3a18f1bfaf.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment271755923</link>
<description>The problem is NOT with capitalism.  Capitalism allows markets and consumers to dictate winners and losers.  If consumers don&amp;#039;t want a company to make profits, it won&amp;#039;t.  It&amp;#039;s when companies are artificially propped up and insulated from the market, circumventing market forces, it is government&amp;#039;s dallying that facilitates their &amp;quot;squeezing out of the middle class&amp;quot; because they are shielded from the consequences of their decisions.  Look at any industry and see the artificial barriers government has erected on behalf of their cronies in corporate America.  If the market is allowed to operate FREELY, then irresponsible management is either replaced with responsible management or the company fails and is replaced by a company  whose management operates more responsibly.  For example, had the irresponsible banks been allowed to fail in 2008 and sold to stronger, better managed banks (many of which had stepped in and picked up the slack during the 9-11recession), then we would have a much stronger and resilient banking system.  As it is, the politicians propped up the status quo and we will again see the same systemic failures down the road because we refused to allow the marketplace to correct itself this time around.  Believe me--the problems we see with &amp;quot;capitalism&amp;quot; today have nothing whatsoever to do with capitalism and everything to do with government trying to circumvent it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.be33fda73987ff722e71ca3a18f1bfaf.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment271755923</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Davos elites to seek reforms of \&#039;outdated\&#039; capitalism</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.be33fda73987ff722e71ca3a18f1bfaf.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment271710273</link>
<description>Seriously?  Is what is failing in Europe &amp;quot;capitalism?&amp;quot;  What a bunch of bs.  If these idiots don&amp;#039;t even know what capitalism is, then they sure as hell deserve to lose everything they have.  We have an issue with too much regulation, too much government participation in the economy.  Trying to &amp;quot;make it better&amp;quot; inevitably makes it worse.  Get your stinking hands off the economy, you &amp;quot;elites,&amp;quot; and let it work on its own.  I know it means you won&amp;#039;t get bailed out next time you lose your ass, but hey--them&amp;#039;s the breaks... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.be33fda73987ff722e71ca3a18f1bfaf.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment271710273</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Union Radicals Harass Teacher Who Dared to Support Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/eagtv/2011/12/07/union-radicals-harass-teacher-who-dared-to-support-wisconsin-gov-scott-walker/#IDComment235418195</link>
<description>I taught for 3 years in Texas, and while there was union representation, it never approached the kind of absolute union rule present in California, my new residence.  The unions run the school districts here.  The school kids here are 3 years behind the schools in Texas.  Admittedly, we had our kids in the best public schools in the state, but still--3 years?  My son (4th grade) is learning stuff he learned in 1st, my 7th grader is learning stuff my son had already learned before we left, and my high schooler is transferring to a &amp;quot;middle college&amp;quot; because she&amp;#039;s miles ahead of the other sophomores in her class.  I can only guess what kind of mess they have in Wisconsin.  Based on their behavior, I&amp;#039;ll bet it&amp;#039;s even worse than California, and that&amp;#039;s sad.  The parents and students there have no idea how badly they&amp;#039;re being cheated out of their education.  They should demand reform and de-certification of the unions or at least do away with tenure so the districts can start firing these political hacks and hiring real teachers. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 06:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/eagtv/2011/12/07/union-radicals-harass-teacher-who-dared-to-support-wisconsin-gov-scott-walker/#IDComment235418195</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Source for McGinniss in Random House Literary Hoax Accuses Andrew Breitbart of &#039;Hacking&#039; Email</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2011/09/23/source-for-mcginniss-in-random-house-literary-hoax-accuses-andrew-breitbart-of-hacking-email/#IDComment197962384</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The MUCH more important question in my mind is HOW did Breitbart get that e-mail? I don&amp;rsquo;t share my private e-mails with ANYBODY! At least on my end, the only two people who should have seen it are Joe and I.  And really WHY would Joe send it to anybody else? So is it possible that we now have an American case of News Corp phone hacking techniques being used by a well known contributor to Fox News? That is the question that I want to see answered!&amp;quot;  I&amp;#039;m sure THAT&amp;#039;S the question you want to see answered--since you&amp;#039;d obviously like to see the subject changed, you pig.  And as for why Joe would send it to anybody else--how much did you pay him to keep it quiet?  You lie down with dogs, you get fleas.  Griffin probably feels like you owed him part of your book proceeds and you not offering left him with no way to turn a profit, did it?  Did you really think he&amp;#039;d be happy as an &amp;quot;unidentified source&amp;quot; when he sees himself as the chief Palin hater and you an interloper at best?  I&amp;#039;ll bet he even tried to get his own deal with Random while you were pumping him for lies and when they didn&amp;#039;t bite, he decided he&amp;#039;d bring you both down after the book was published.  You libs need to learn that there&amp;#039;s no such thing as honor or loyalty on your side. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2011/09/23/source-for-mcginniss-in-random-house-literary-hoax-accuses-andrew-breitbart-of-hacking-email/#IDComment197962384</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : EXCLUSIVE: Chuck Heath, Jr., Brother of Gov. Palin, Responds to McGinniss, Random House: &#039;One Lie Af</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/09/23/exclusive-chuck-heath-jr-brother-of-gov-palin-responds-to-mcginniss-random-house-one-lie-after-another/#IDComment197958415</link>
<description>Says the idiot who hasn&amp;#039;t read McGinnis&amp;#039; own email to his blogger source.  Read a little--you might learn something:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/09/22/explosive-email-shows-anti-palin-author-mcginniss-random-house-likely-published-literary-hoax/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/09/22/ex...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/09/23/exclusive-chuck-heath-jr-brother-of-gov-palin-responds-to-mcginniss-random-house-one-lie-after-another/#IDComment197958415</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US could absorb a terror attack and bounce back: official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.6f90940f6d9bb44d73f1c586d3a44fbb.1021&amp;show_article=1#IDComment102927457</link>
<description>Lefties just don&amp;#039;t get it.  Nobody&amp;#039;s said we can&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;absorb&amp;quot; a terrorist attack.  OF COURSE WE CAN.  Does that mean we should sit on our hands until it happens?  Does that mean we should sit here with wide-open borders until disaster strikes?  Does that mean we should withdraw from Afghanistan and Iraq and hope for the best?  Morons. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.6f90940f6d9bb44d73f1c586d3a44fbb.1021&amp;show_article=1#IDComment102927457</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Mother furious after in-school clinic sets up daughter\&#039;s abortion | KOMO News - Breaking News, Spor</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/88971742.html#IDComment63867434</link>
<description>Not to sound heartless, but what did this woman expect, living in the People&amp;#039;s Republic of Washington?  Parental Rights???  As long as they don&amp;#039;t conflict with the &amp;quot;rights of the state.&amp;quot;  I&amp;#039;m surprised the tyrants of King County even let you raise your own kids.  I&amp;#039;d have thought they&amp;#039;d be taking them from you as soon as they were weened to be raised in a state-run facility. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/88971742.html#IDComment63867434</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Max Blumenthal, Equal-Opportunity Hater</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/mvadum/2010/02/08/max-blumenthal-equal-opportunity-hater/#IDComment55912011</link>
<description>Does anybody else notice that when libs throw out their vitriol and diatribes, they are generally describing their own politics?  Sorry, Max--it&amp;#039;s the far-left, nutty liberal/progressives who have taken over a major party.  And it ain&amp;#039;t the Republican Party.  And if Republicans are such a small-tent party, how come we&amp;#039;re whipping your arse in every election since Obama&amp;#039;s?  Face it--you represent a side that&amp;#039;s far more vitriolic, far less logical, and far more incompetent than anything the Republicans represent.  And it&amp;#039;s not because the American people are stupid--it&amp;#039;s because they know the lessons of the past.  Liberalism goes nowhere, destroys whatever it comes into contact with, and oppresses anyone who doesn&amp;#039;t agree with it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/mvadum/2010/02/08/max-blumenthal-equal-opportunity-hater/#IDComment55912011</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Embattled Obama declares in speech, \&#039;I don\&#039;t quit\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DGGIN01&amp;show_article=1#IDComment54217138</link>
<description>Heh.  Even a Democratic flack like Jennifer Loven can&amp;#039;t put lipstick on this pig.  And &amp;quot;A deficit of trust?&amp;quot;  You don&amp;#039;t say?!  As opposed to GWB, who libs spent all day and night contorting words and meanings to make him appear to be a liar, this man lies through his teeth!  Foreign corporations donating to campaigns?  He&amp;#039;s either ignorant of the law (Can&amp;#039;t be!  He was President of the Harvard Law Review!), or he&amp;#039;s a shameless liar.  And America has finally figured out which one applies. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DGGIN01&amp;show_article=1#IDComment54217138</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : 4 charged in phone scheme at La. senator\&#039;s office</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DFMEJ00&amp;show_article=1#IDComment54016215</link>
<description>&amp;quot;He managed to do what Republicans have been trying to do for years&amp;mdash;hurt the political affiliates of ACORN, which have registered hundreds of thousands of voters in urban and other poor areas of the country. &amp;quot;  This is such a typical lib reporter paragraph!  Like the reason Republicans were trying to discredit ACORN was because they&amp;#039;d legitimately &amp;quot;registered hundreds of thousands of voters in urban and other poor areas of the country.&amp;quot;  What a crock... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DFMEJ00&amp;show_article=1#IDComment54016215</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Hide the Job Decline: $500k in Stimulus Funds to ClimateGate Professor</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2010/01/14/hide-the-job-decline-stimulus-funds-to-climategate-professor/#IDComment52271199</link>
<description>Wouldn&amp;#039;t it make more sense to give the $500k to McIntyre since he seems to have a better grasp of climate change? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2010/01/14/hide-the-job-decline-stimulus-funds-to-climategate-professor/#IDComment52271199</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>