<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/597886</link>
		<description>Comments by JSBurke</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : ABC News: Obama Strikes Out in Asia</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-obama-asia-trip-fails/#IDComment109579818</link>
<description>What is wrong with everybody? Criticizing Dear Leader in such a manner. Can&amp;#039;t you all see what the real problem is, it is so very obvious. The other nineteen leaders of the G20 are nothing but a bunch of racist, bitter clingers who are intellectually incapable of fully grasping the brilliant subtlety of The One&amp;#039;s Plan for the World.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-obama-asia-trip-fails/#IDComment109579818</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Conservatives (and Everybody Else) Could Learn From New Film ‘Cool It’</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/blomborg/2010/11/07/what-conservatives-and-everybody-else-could-learn-from-new-film-cool-it/#IDComment108389926</link>
<description>First, lets stop criticizing Big Hollywood and Breitbart for allowing this post, we are not like the Left, which tries to silence all opposing views. The only way to understand our ideological opponents is by listening to their views, not hostile interpretations of those views, which is essentially how the left deals with their ideological opponents. And the only way to be able to learn to refute those views is also by listening to what they are saying. Now, as to the logic of the &amp;quot;we must reduce carbon emissions to stop global warming&amp;quot; argument. Notice that even if we go back to levels that are 20% lower than those of 1990 the ultimate outcome will be a drop in temperature of .1 degree Fahrenheit. I would like to see the figures of how much atmospheric carbon has increased since the beginning of the 20th century and how much the figure, 20% lower than 1990 levels, represents of the total carbon increase. Because if reducing by that amount will only lead to a drop in .1 degree Fahrenheit, then conversely, an increase by that amount, according to their theories, will only increase temps the same.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/blomborg/2010/11/07/what-conservatives-and-everybody-else-could-learn-from-new-film-cool-it/#IDComment108389926</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Eco-Terrorism: Animal Planet&#039;s &#039;Whale Wars&#039; Celebrates Psychotic Whaling Activists</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mwilson/2010/08/27/eco-terrorism-animal-planets-whale-wars-celebrates-psychotic-whaling-activists/#IDComment95633241</link>
<description>I say give them all some old cannons, muskets and swords and let them fight it out Trafalgar style. Bet the Japanese beat them like they beat the Russians at Port Arthur in 19 aught 5. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 05:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mwilson/2010/08/27/eco-terrorism-animal-planets-whale-wars-celebrates-psychotic-whaling-activists/#IDComment95633241</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Smart Journalism. Real Solutions. Miller-McCune. : Recreating the Creative Industry in New Orleans</title>
<link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/business-economics/recreating-the-creative-industry-in-new-orleans-21431/#IDComment95145251</link>
<description>The author offered many good ideas on how to rebuild New Orleans; however, some were a bit myopic. Why emphasize certain current, en vogue industries? No one can predict with any degree of certainty what sectors of the economy, what industries will be profitable and economically viable and thus able to continue to provide job opportunities and serve as a tax base. Just ask the now defunct Eastern European communist countries about trying to plan economic futures; it is an exercise in futility. The city should establish an environment that is conducive to all types of business so that future innovators and entrepreneurs do not have to wait for their industry to be hip in order to be granted special favors by the city.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.miller-mccune.com/business-economics/recreating-the-creative-industry-in-new-orleans-21431/#IDComment95145251</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : America: Still Talking About Race</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jphillips/2010/08/22/america-still-talking-about-race/#IDComment94753086</link>
<description>What is so patheticaly humourous about Obama critics being called racist is that Bill and Hillary got ten times the criticism as the Blamer in Chief. So those who have been closely following politics for years know there really is no basis for the claim that Obama is being treated unfairly. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 02:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jphillips/2010/08/22/america-still-talking-about-race/#IDComment94753086</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Muslim group warns \&#039;South Park\&#039; creators of death</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F7O89G0&show_article=1#IDComment69602400</link>
<description>Came home to watch the midnight repeat of SouthPark to catch episode 2; found a rerun from earlier this month. Did Comedy Central wuss out again? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F7O89G0&show_article=1#IDComment69602400</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Censorship and Libel at USC</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/censorship-and-libel-at-usc-by-david-horowitz/#IDComment52030884</link>
<description>You have to understand all the different philosophies that were borrowed from by the Scientific Socialists before you can understand how they can, despite their claims to being &amp;quot;tolerant and liberal,&amp;quot; actually promote totalitarianism. When a &amp;quot;classical liberal&amp;quot; (modern conservative) talks about freedom they mean that individuals are free from government interference in enjoying &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.&amp;quot; For modern liberals (scientific socialists) freedom means that people are free to follow natural laws and sociological laws, with those laws being determined by an elite intellectual class, who will then transmit them to the political class who turn them into civil laws that have to be followed. Pardon the run-on sentence. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/censorship-and-libel-at-usc-by-david-horowitz/#IDComment52030884</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood’s Hand Job, Or... How the Awards Season Comes Upon Us</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jlindsey/2010/01/13/hollywoods-hand-job-or-how-the-awards-season-comes-upon-us/#IDComment51858313</link>
<description>I love it. Hollywood stars: The Herpes sores on America&amp;#039;s face. No wonder the Muslim&amp;#039;s hate us, they don&amp;#039;t want our herpes spreading to them. And who can blame them for that? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jlindsey/2010/01/13/hollywoods-hand-job-or-how-the-awards-season-comes-upon-us/#IDComment51858313</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : &#039;Sin,&#039; Lies and Missing Audiotape: How &#039;Gawker&#039; Duped Me into an Interview</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/01/07/sin-lies-and-missing-audio-tape-how-gawker-duped-me-into-an-interview/#IDComment51026625</link>
<description>I just got off the phone with Ms. Reagan, a call which I taped, and she has admitted that she is, in her own words, &amp;quot;A half-witted, sleazy, unscrupulous, dishonest and untalented journalistic hack who doesn&amp;#039;t care about the truth, facts or America and has to resort to lies and distortions to sell a product.&amp;quot; And as soon as I find my invisible tape recorder I will prove that those are her own words. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/01/07/sin-lies-and-missing-audio-tape-how-gawker-duped-me-into-an-interview/#IDComment51026625</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Tonight: &#039;The Goode Family&#039; Gets a New Life</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50603318</link>
<description>And I have to disagree on what Classical Liberal tenets consevatives are defending in the modern era. All the true conservatives I am familiar with defend the principles of individual liberties and rights versus modern liberal principles of group identity and rights and collectivism; they defend the idea of free market capitalism versus modern liberal notions of quasi-socialistic state interventionist economic policies; they promote the idea of federalism and a small, non-obtrusive federal government versus modern liberalism&amp;#039;s overpowerful and large bureaucratic central government; and modern conservatives believe in the power of individuals to take care of their own interests and in individual personal responsibility versus modern liberalism&amp;#039;s notion that the government has a large role in taking care of people, even those who are irresponsible and are the cause of their own suffering. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50603318</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Tonight: &#039;The Goode Family&#039; Gets a New Life</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50602118</link>
<description>There is much confusion concerning Classical Liberalism and religion; that confusion arising from people juxtaposing the views of the Enlightenment radicals with those of Classical liberals. It was the radicals who wanted to completely secularize society and rid it of all vestiges of religion. The vast majority of Classical Liberals understood the attachment people felt towards their religions as well as their customs and traditions. They understood that the best way to inspire the rise of a reactionary party was to attack people&amp;#039;s religion, customs and traditions. And that is what has been happening in the U.S. since the 1950s beginning with Supreme Court judges who deliberately misinterpreted the 1st Amendment. Nowhere does it mention a separation of church and state; that phrase was selectively taken from one letter Jefferson wrote to a Baptist minister circa 1803. As everyone should know Jefferson had nothing whatsoever to do with writing the Constitution so for judges to take his single statement and use it to make it the law of the land is a gross violation of the Constitution as well as the intent of the Founding Fathers.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50602118</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Tonight: &#039;The Goode Family&#039; Gets a New Life</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50539003</link>
<description>I would like to reply to this but I do have several errands to attend to at this time, so I will have to delay my response. I appreciate your candor and civility; it makes the exchange of ideas more edifying. And I apologize for my earlier sarcasm, it was not very civilized. Take care. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 23:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50539003</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Tonight: &#039;The Goode Family&#039; Gets a New Life</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50538708</link>
<description>I understand your frustration, many true modern conservatives (and by that I mean limited, small government, free market adherents) are as equally frustrated by many who pretend to hold conservative values. The self-annointed Republican elites have more in common with their Democratic elitiest counterparts than they do with the majority of those they seek to represent. They are both descendents of the wealthy progressive movement that arose in the late 19th - early 20th century and which was a fan of such great ideas as Eugenics, Fascism and Stalinism. Neither group has any faith in the individual or believes that individuals are capable of knowing what is best for themselves. But don&amp;#039;t confuse those conservatives who promote entrepreneurs, capitalists and corporations by allowing them to succeed or fail based upon their ability to satisfy market demands with the pretend conservatives who use the power of government to favor those businesses that reciprocally support the politicians. The latter are essentially corporate-socialists. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 23:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50538708</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Tonight: &#039;The Goode Family&#039; Gets a New Life</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50507170</link>
<description>If you really want to know what motivates conservatives I recommend reading &amp;quot;Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Though from David Hume to the Present,&amp;quot; ed. Jerry Z. Muller. Though you are correct about traditional religious values being a cornerstone of American conservatism that is just one aspect of the ideological foundation of conservatism. Read the great Classical Liberal theorists from the 17th to early 19th centuries (Hume, Locke, Smith, J.B. Say, Frederic Bastiat, J.S. Mill) and you will understand that what modern conservatives are defending are the principles advocated by those and others. And if you read the theories of Saint-Simon, Auguste Comte (both of whom advocated a form of totalitarian society that was governed by a combination of intellectual and industrial elite) as well as Marx and other socialist advocates then you will understand what motivates modern liberalism.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 18:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50507170</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Tonight: &#039;The Goode Family&#039; Gets a New Life</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50494436</link>
<description>See, now that was extremely amusing to me considering that I have been an agnostic for 31 years. That you would automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with your childish and simplistic worldview is motivated by conservative religious beliefs proves my point that most on the left are, to be frank, complete idiots and as your name suggests, have fluff for brains. Now as I can&amp;#039;t stop my obviously justifed laughter at your expense I must be off and away.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50494436</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : TCM&#039;s Ben Mankiewicz: Political Cheap Shots Damage Beloved Network</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lgrin/2010/01/05/tcms-ben-mankiewicz-political-cheap-shots-damage-beloved-network/#IDComment50463551</link>
<description>It is interesting that the left-wing, methane sniffers can only come up with the equivalent of the schoolyard retort of &amp;quot;I know you are but what am I?&amp;quot;  Bravo, well done little Mike. Now here&amp;#039;s a cookie and on to the short bus you go. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lgrin/2010/01/05/tcms-ben-mankiewicz-political-cheap-shots-damage-beloved-network/#IDComment50463551</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Tonight: &#039;The Goode Family&#039; Gets a New Life</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50401205</link>
<description>Well heck, conservatives do not need a bunch of comedians, sitcoms or movies to point out the utter and hopeless hilarity of left-ardism. Not a day goes by that I do not derive great amusement at the expense of the left and all by simply reading something written by or listening to someone on the left. The self-annointed intellectual elites (hell that cracks me up just writing it) provide a veritable cornucopia of hilariously insane and lunatic pronouncements. What is extremely amusing is the unbounded delusions and intellectual pretensions of the left; I guess that is the result of engaging in a decades&amp;#039; long game of ego-stroking circle jerk. In reality, most on the left who try to pass themselves off as clever wits are no more insightful than a three-year old. And after telling yet one more in the latest feeble and simplistic jokes about conservatives, they resemble a three-year old who is excited at having gone the entire day without pooping in his pants.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/01/04/tonight-the-goode-family-gets-a-new-life/#IDComment50401205</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Return the Gifts</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/12/21/daily-gut-return-the-gifts/#IDComment48510697</link>
<description>Great bit of sarcasm; trying to take the Gut&amp;#039;s job? May the Great One drop coins down your chimney.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/12/21/daily-gut-return-the-gifts/#IDComment48510697</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : (NSFW): &#039;Funny or Die&#039; Dies -- Minions Pledge Allegiance to ObamaCare</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/12/18/nsfw-funny-or-die-dies-minions-pledge-allegiance-to-obamacare/#IDComment47917180</link>
<description>It is, did it when I was in my 20s. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/12/18/nsfw-funny-or-die-dies-minions-pledge-allegiance-to-obamacare/#IDComment47917180</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : The Sarah Palin Thing</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jphillips/2009/12/08/the-sarah-palin-thing/#IDComment46346615</link>
<description>Hmm, lets see. Yes, in 2012 the Dems will run an America(n) hating, Third-World despot loving, economic illiterate, narcissistic man-child who has delusions of god-hood. This candidate will campaign on the platform that, &amp;quot;its not my fault, I inherited this mess&amp;quot; and that if we just allow him to put us 20 trillion more dollars in debt then he will fix our economy. This candidate will be surrounded by brown shirt wearing ACORN and SEIU thugs as well as legions of ass-kissing celebutards and leg-humping media hoes. How is that for some content? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jphillips/2009/12/08/the-sarah-palin-thing/#IDComment46346615</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>