<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/315450</link>
		<description>Comments by JCIll</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Dem Rep Calls For Christmas Crisis to Force GOP on Tax Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-rep-calls-for-christmas-crisis-to-force-gop-on-tax-debate/#IDComment115110229</link>
<description>I am embarrassed to admit that I live in Illinois, which I have always believed to be the political garbage pit of the country.  I am happy to know that we may well be number 3 now, following Minnesota and California.  Between Al Franken and this maniac, Minnesota wins the award hands down. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-rep-calls-for-christmas-crisis-to-force-gop-on-tax-debate/#IDComment115110229</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Ariz. gov.: Send Guard choppers from other states</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FRE7OO0&show_article=1#IDComment76560371</link>
<description>I can only assume that you were being facetious, and did not deserve the large thumbs down count.  If you were serious, I can only assume that you are a very sick person, and the count is not large enough.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FRE7OO0&show_article=1#IDComment76560371</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Ariz. gov.: Send Guard choppers from other states</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FRE7OO0&show_article=1#IDComment76559326</link>
<description>I am reminded of Bill Clinton being caught lying under oath, and his apologists would say &amp;quot;It was only about sex, so no harm was done&amp;quot;.  So I began looking for a list of subjects about which one could commit perjury and which subjects were not allowed.  Couldn&amp;#039;t find such a list.  Now there seems to be a list somewhere of which laws should be enforced, and which ones need not be enforced.  I can&amp;#039;t find that list either, but the administration must have one.  I would like to know if speeding and running stop signs are on the non-enforced list so that I don&amp;#039;t need to worry about traffic laws while I drive. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 20:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FRE7OO0&show_article=1#IDComment76559326</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : LA cardinal: Nazism in Arizona immigration bill</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F6V25O0&show_article=1#IDComment69056476</link>
<description>So set me straight on this.  Do you agree that the Arizona law is equivalent to Nazism or Soviet Communism?  If you do, you are as insane as the Cardinal.  Also. I did not see any mention of priests living the live of luxury in the original post.   Interested in money could very well mean money for their congregations.  Drink decaf next time. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F6V25O0&show_article=1#IDComment69056476</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : White House Caught Altering Stimulus Baseline Projection by 7 Million Jobs </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/04/19/white-house-caught-altering-stimulus-baseline-projection-by-7-million-jobs/#IDComment68893756</link>
<description>It has up till now.   The future is highly in question.  The left is slowly but surely trying to emasculate the constitution.  Check out my congressman Phil Hare, who admitted that he does not care about the Constitution.  I&amp;#039;m not sure he is alone. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/04/19/white-house-caught-altering-stimulus-baseline-projection-by-7-million-jobs/#IDComment68893756</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran missile will strike Tel Aviv if hit: Khamenei aide</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.870e381b1ca37a08fe027aaf4f7159fb.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment66284763</link>
<description>Ya know, at one time we were building a missile defense system that would have protected Europe and Israel from enemy ballistic missiles.  Somehow, in 2009, the program was canceled.   Seems our president thought that sitting down and talking was more effective than defending ourselves.  I believe that Obama voters should be down on their knees apologizing for electing this incompetent, and vowing to never again voting for anybody based on their skin color or their ability to read a teleprompter. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Apr 2010 22:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.870e381b1ca37a08fe027aaf4f7159fb.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment66284763</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Rep. John Murtha, Iraq war critic, dies at 77</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DO6O4G0&show_article=1#IDComment55977544</link>
<description>I just read that there will be a special election, maybe in May </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DO6O4G0&show_article=1#IDComment55977544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Rep. John Murtha, Iraq war critic, dies at 77</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DO6O4G0&show_article=1#IDComment55977428</link>
<description>I am disappointed at the conservatives who stoop to the levels of the lefties when Tony Snow was diagnosed with cancer.  I agree with your opinion of Murtha, but it would be nice if his body were cold before all of the hatred comes out.  Some of the comments sound like the Daily Kos or Huffington.  Please don&amp;#039;t give liberals any more ammunition, and let the nastiness continue to be a leftwing trait. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DO6O4G0&show_article=1#IDComment55977428</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Supreme Court Drop-Kicks McCain/Feingold, Scores Victory for 1st Amendment;  Obama preparing &#039;Forcef</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/#IDComment53210635</link>
<description>We agree </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/#IDComment53210635</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Supreme Court Drop-Kicks McCain/Feingold, Scores Victory for 1st Amendment;  Obama preparing &#039;Forcef</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/#IDComment53206946</link>
<description>No angry reply here.  Taking money out of the election process would be a wonderful thing.  I would rather have seen new restrictions on union donations to level the playing field.  Now congress needs to sit down and find a way to either restrict donations constitutionally or change the constitution.  I don&amp;#039;t have an answer, but something needs to be done.  Do you believe that multi-billionaires should be able to buy an election with his own money?  Lots to think about. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/#IDComment53206946</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Supreme Court Drop-Kicks McCain/Feingold, Scores Victory for 1st Amendment;  Obama preparing &#039;Forcef</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/#IDComment53205865</link>
<description>It does not really sound good to me.  However, allowing unions unlimited contributions does not sound good either.  It is time to find a way to take money out of politics constitutionally without giving special privileges to one group over another.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/#IDComment53205865</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Supreme Court Drop-Kicks McCain/Feingold, Scores Victory for 1st Amendment;  Obama preparing &#039;Forcef</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/#IDComment53205446</link>
<description>Getting money out of politics would be a good thing, if it could be done constitutionally.  However, preventing corporations from donating while permitting unions to steal dues from members for political contributions is NOT a good thing.  Now we have a level playing field, and I would hope that congress can find a way eliminate money as the prerequisite for winning an election, without giving special privileges to one group over another. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/#IDComment53205446</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : APNewsBreak: AP sources: Obama to Massachusetts</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D8BJU04&amp;show_article=1#IDComment52375710</link>
<description>If you really don&amp;#039;t think this country is moving toward socialism, then there is no reason to continue this conversation.  Every year the government gets larger and controls more of our lives.  The private sector, which you loathe so violently is the nucleus of capitalism, and emasculating it has to lead to socialism.  Private companies provide jobs, and taking away their incentive to succeed will eventually require the government to take over.  And please, get off that Bush kick.  He was almost as bad as Obama, and your attempt to get under the skins of conservatives by spitting up Bush&amp;#039;s name in every conversation is not working.  I&amp;#039;m really surprised you haven&amp;#039;t brought up Palin&amp;#039;s name yet.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D8BJU04&amp;show_article=1#IDComment52375710</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : APNewsBreak: AP sources: Obama to Massachusetts</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D8BJU04&amp;show_article=1#IDComment52360575</link>
<description>Have to agree with Glenn.  Your post looks like one from a punk kid playing with his mommy&amp;#039;s computer.  Nappy time now. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D8BJU04&amp;show_article=1#IDComment52360575</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : APNewsBreak: AP sources: Obama to Massachusetts</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D8BJU04&amp;show_article=1#IDComment52359862</link>
<description>so&amp;middot;cial&amp;middot;ism    (sō&amp;#039;shə-lĭz&amp;#039;əm)    n.       1.        Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.  Does any of that definition from American Heritage sound familiar to you?  Does nationalizing the banks and auto companies ring a bell?  How about government-controlled health care?  Socialism is coming, and our grandchildren will be the innocent victims.  It is not hyperbole...it is reality. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 01:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D8BJU04&amp;show_article=1#IDComment52359862</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Rupert Murdoch vs. the Internet</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/08/rupert-murdoch-vs-the-internet/#IDComment51326662</link>
<description>Somehow, the thought that government-run news sources are trustworthy makes me laugh.  Corporations have an agenda but governments don&amp;#039;t?????  I can&amp;#039;t defend corporate-owned news, but one would have to be brainwashed to consider government sources unbiased.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/08/rupert-murdoch-vs-the-internet/#IDComment51326662</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Fed members see high unemployment as key concern</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-SMV57&amp;show_article=1#IDComment50726778</link>
<description>I have been reading posts for a long time, but that one is the most ignorant.  I have no idea what he was talking about. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-SMV57&amp;show_article=1#IDComment50726778</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Fed members see high unemployment as key concern</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-SMV57&amp;show_article=1#IDComment50726549</link>
<description>I too have children and grandchildren.  I may be long gone before the tsunami hits, but I fear deeply for my descendants.  This country is being destroyed in a few months.  We can only hope to defeat these terrorists who are running our government and replace them with patriots. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-SMV57&amp;show_article=1#IDComment50726549</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Fed members see high unemployment as key concern</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-SMV57&amp;show_article=1#IDComment50726310</link>
<description>Now I have change.  At one time I had dollar bills in my pocket. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-SMV57&amp;show_article=1#IDComment50726310</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : UN Security Stops Journalist&#039;s Questions About ClimateGate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2009/12/11/un-security-stops-journalists-questions-about-climategate/#IDComment46832435</link>
<description>Probably true, but I would like to get them out of the USA.  Most of them hate us, and we are paying their keep.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2009/12/11/un-security-stops-journalists-questions-about-climategate/#IDComment46832435</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>