<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/555722</link>
		<description>Comments by Inkless</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Fascist takeover! Or else a Commalition! Consensus at last!</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/fascist-takeover-commalition-consensus-at-last/#IDComment146037670</link>
<description>One difference between Ekos and these others is that Ekos projects from a single very recent poll. The others are evolving projections averaged across several more or less recent polls. On a fast-changing situation it&amp;#039;s hardly axiomatic that projections based partly on last Wednesday are more accurate than one that isn&amp;#039;t.   Of course I don&amp;#039;t know where objective truth lies, or where it&amp;#039;s going. But if Ekos looks weird, it should. Things are getting weird.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 01:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/fascist-takeover-commalition-consensus-at-last/#IDComment146037670</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Let the games begin</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/let-the-games-begin-2/#IDComment137527545</link>
<description>in&amp;middot;sip&amp;middot;id  (n-spd) adj. 1. Lacking flavor or zest; not tasty. 2. Lacking qualities that excite, stimulate, or interest; dull.  The Conservatives should feel free to win 600 seats in this election. It was an insipid budget. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/let-the-games-begin-2/#IDComment137527545</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Let the games begin</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/let-the-games-begin-2/#IDComment137477479</link>
<description>Super-gewaltige politische Betreiber </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/25/let-the-games-begin-2/#IDComment137477479</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Hey look: Election speculation, 2020 edition</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/hey-look-election-speculation-2020-edition#IDComment135912298</link>
<description>Persuasive. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/hey-look-election-speculation-2020-edition#IDComment135912298</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The future: Trudeau vs. Kenney</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/the-future-trudeau-vs-kenney/#IDComment135870716</link>
<description>Flee. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/the-future-trudeau-vs-kenney/#IDComment135870716</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Carson show</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/17/the-carson-show/#IDComment135844423</link>
<description>This is indeed an excellent scoop by APTN. Scoops of this nature -- a very specific misfeasance instead of some generalized system gone bad -- are almost always the product of tips; the &amp;quot;digging&amp;quot; comes &lt;i&gt;after&lt;/i&gt; you&amp;#039;re told there&amp;#039;s a story there. The people delivering a tip go either to a reporter they know, or to a news outlet chosen because it&amp;#039;ll go big with a certain kind of story. Recall that this is about water quality on First Nations reserves. I&amp;#039;d go to APTN too.   &amp;quot;Surely the media knew?&amp;quot; In five years that this government has been in power, I&amp;#039;ve met the spouses of two ministers out of about 40, and of about two staffers out of hundreds. It&amp;#039;s actually not Facebook up here.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/17/the-carson-show/#IDComment135844423</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Carson show</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/17/the-carson-show/#IDComment135745767</link>
<description>You mean 2011? I&amp;#039;ve been on Team 12 all year and I don&amp;#039;t like to change a categorical prediction once I&amp;#039;ve made one, because that&amp;#039;s lame and easy. It&amp;#039;s like what bank economists do with their growth projections. I&amp;#039;m sticking with my 2012 prediction. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 04:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/17/the-carson-show/#IDComment135745767</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : France: Land of Conrad Black&#039;s dreams</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/10/france-land-of-conrad-blacks-dreams#IDComment133873857</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The government will join, notwithstanding its failure to prepare, its neglect in co-operating with its allies, or its inability to contribute. In the end it will join out of the necessity created by a pattern of uncertainty and indecision. It will not join as a leader but unnoticed at the back of the parade.&amp;rdquo;  &amp;mdash;&amp;nbsp;Stephen Harper, April 2003 </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/10/france-land-of-conrad-blacks-dreams#IDComment133873857</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : France: Land of Conrad Black&#039;s dreams</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/10/france-land-of-conrad-blacks-dreams#IDComment133873174</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Boss&amp;quot; these days is indeed a term of endearment, not contract law.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/10/france-land-of-conrad-blacks-dreams#IDComment133873174</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Free trade with Europe? Never mind</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/17/free-trade-with-europe-never-mind/#IDComment128739910</link>
<description>(After deleting a few rounds of insults back and forth) Please stop sniping at each other. I&amp;#039;ll shut comments down rather than put up with it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 05:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/17/free-trade-with-europe-never-mind/#IDComment128739910</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Coyne v. Wells on the protests in Egypt</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/03/coyne-v-wells-on-the-prospects-for-democracy-in-egypt/#IDComment125995313</link>
<description>That Guergis/Charest video was awesome, though. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/03/coyne-v-wells-on-the-prospects-for-democracy-in-egypt/#IDComment125995313</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Who the Tories stand with on human rights</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/04/who-the-tories-stand-with-on-human-rights/#IDComment125993576</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m traveling and just read Dan now. His take does diverge from mine but it&amp;#039;s well worth reading and considering. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/04/who-the-tories-stand-with-on-human-rights/#IDComment125993576</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What you don’t know about Stephen Harper</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/31/what-you-dont-know-about-stephen-harper/#IDComment125221454</link>
<description>If this is full attack mode, I&amp;#039;m overpaid. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/31/what-you-dont-know-about-stephen-harper/#IDComment125221454</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Music: As good as it gets</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/music-as-good-as-it-gets/#IDComment120719211</link>
<description>Try this guy.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/11/richard-nixon-opera-superstar/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/11/richard-nixon-...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/music-as-good-as-it-gets/#IDComment120719211</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Music: As good as it gets</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/music-as-good-as-it-gets/#IDComment120717609</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d debate including Vaughan Williams, but I&amp;#039;m just glad to see Haydn there.   If the mandate were &amp;quot;stuff I like&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;try to set up some quasi-objective measure of greatness,&amp;quot; I&amp;#039;d include Morton Feldman, Saint-Sa&amp;euml;ns and maybe Charles Ives. And Wagner wouldn&amp;#039;t be on my final list. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/10/music-as-good-as-it-gets/#IDComment120717609</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The longer he&#039;s prime minister</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-longer-hes-prime-minister/#IDComment120086128</link>
<description>I think that&amp;#039;s fair. One should also look at the times. The postwar period was an extended period, in much of the world, of sustained rapid economic growth and unprecedented expansion of government ambition. The French call the period &amp;quot;les trentes glorieuses,&amp;quot; the 30 glorious years, because universal pensions and social programs were implemented in lots of jurisdictions. Probably if Pearson &lt;i&gt;hadn&amp;#039;t&lt;/i&gt; radically increased the scale and ambit of the federal state, he&amp;#039;d have been vulnerable politically.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jan 2011 21:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-longer-hes-prime-minister/#IDComment120086128</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The longer he&#039;s prime minister</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-longer-hes-prime-minister/#IDComment120070439</link>
<description>Maybe?... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jan 2011 19:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/the-longer-hes-prime-minister/#IDComment120070439</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : How Stephen Harper will survive in 2011 </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-stephen-harper-will-survive/#IDComment120042901</link>
<description>Coyne drew the short straw. He&amp;#039;s Meaty Policy Man this week.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-stephen-harper-will-survive/#IDComment120042901</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : How Stephen Harper will survive in 2011 </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-stephen-harper-will-survive/#IDComment120036969</link>
<description>Could Durward and ABC maybe arm-wrestle and decide whether I&amp;#039;m a lackey for the Liberals or the Conservatives? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/07/how-stephen-harper-will-survive/#IDComment120036969</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The historic unpleasantness of the Vaughan by-election</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/03/the-historic-unpleasantness-of-the-vaughan-by-election/#IDComment119328583</link>
<description>Or it may remain Conservative forever.    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cherylgallant.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.cherylgallant.com/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Jan 2011 18:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/03/the-historic-unpleasantness-of-the-vaughan-by-election/#IDComment119328583</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>