<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/3185520</link>
		<description>Comments by Indignation</description>
<item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : How George McGovern and the Left Polarized America</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/03/08/how-mcgovern%e2%80%99s-radical-party-polarized-america/#IDComment311332157</link>
<description>Very good article.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/03/08/how-mcgovern%e2%80%99s-radical-party-polarized-america/#IDComment311332157</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Greg Gutfeld Reacts To Breitbart&#039;s Death</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/greg-gutfeld-reacts-to-andrews-death/#IDComment305644565</link>
<description>Greg is right.  You have to BE A PART of popular culture.  You have to participate, so you can make a difference. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/greg-gutfeld-reacts-to-andrews-death/#IDComment305644565</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Tucker Carlson Reacts To Breitbart&#039;s Death </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/tucker-carlson-reacts-to-andrews-death/#IDComment305626920</link>
<description>I think his passion may have burned the candle at both ends.  Rest in peace.  We&amp;#039;ll pick up your load, brother. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/tucker-carlson-reacts-to-andrews-death/#IDComment305626920</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305606813</link>
<description>I hope this the largest thread ever on this site.  To his friends and family, I hope you&amp;#039;re not reading through this, but if you are, know that he was our ally and he was bold, which is something we rarely get to be.  We&amp;#039;re very sorry for your loss. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305606813</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Turkey reveals symbol for its currency</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T7M0DO0&show_article=1#IDComment305399114</link>
<description>Maybe they should have the image of a Turk covering the mouth of an Armenian with duct tape?  Not sure how to do it tastefully, maybe they should get a French sculptor? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T7M0DO0&show_article=1#IDComment305399114</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Lady Gaga Launches &#039;Born This Way&#039; Foundation</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/lady-gaga-launches-born-this-way-foundation/#IDComment305373350</link>
<description>Glad I wasn&amp;#039;t born that way. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/lady-gaga-launches-born-this-way-foundation/#IDComment305373350</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Prominent Democrat: Legalize Pot</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/prominent-democrat-legalize-pot/#IDComment305239455</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s what I fear.  Their Federal government doesn&amp;#039;t really seem to have control over their country at all.  It resembles the govt. of Pakistan. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/prominent-democrat-legalize-pot/#IDComment305239455</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Prominent Democrat: Legalize Pot</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/prominent-democrat-legalize-pot/#IDComment304840514</link>
<description>Ha ha!  Just terrible. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/prominent-democrat-legalize-pot/#IDComment304840514</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Prominent Democrat: Legalize Pot</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/prominent-democrat-legalize-pot/#IDComment304627076</link>
<description>PS- &amp;quot;more of the same thing&amp;quot;?  You mean leaving the border unsecured?  Yes, I&amp;#039;m pretty tired of that &amp;quot;more of the same thing&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/prominent-democrat-legalize-pot/#IDComment304627076</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Prominent Democrat: Legalize Pot</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/prominent-democrat-legalize-pot/#IDComment304623919</link>
<description>Anyone who thinks that the Mexican border/drug problem will go away has been smoking too much.  A recent story only proves my point.  I&amp;#039;m not saying that legalization isn&amp;#039;t worthy of debate, but the border issue is always brought up a &amp;quot;pro&amp;quot;-legalization point.  They have a criminal problem there, not a pot problem.    &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/02\/10\/world\/americas\/mexico-seizes-15-tons-of-methamphetamine.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/world/americas/...&lt;/a&gt;    Are we to loosen up our meth laws as well, Ms. Schakowsky? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/prominent-democrat-legalize-pot/#IDComment304623919</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : School shootings and where students got their guns</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T6KDMG0&show_article=1#IDComment304024392</link>
<description>They&amp;#039;re stacking them up to use against us, via concerned Moms.  I bet they&amp;#039;re praying for a few more. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T6KDMG0&show_article=1#IDComment304024392</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Former DNC Communications Director: GOP Supports &#039;Letting Women Die&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/former-dnc-communications-director-gop-supports-letting-women-die/#IDComment303936014</link>
<description>LMAO!!!  Man, that&amp;#039;s funny! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/former-dnc-communications-director-gop-supports-letting-women-die/#IDComment303936014</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Former DNC Communications Director: GOP Supports &#039;Letting Women Die&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/former-dnc-communications-director-gop-supports-letting-women-die/#IDComment303921101</link>
<description>Communications director?  I mean, and like, and you know, and like.   Pppppptttt!  Valley girl speak never really died, did it?    Might as well throw in a &amp;quot;literally&amp;quot; in there too.  It&amp;#039;s the latest thing.  Her shorthand of issues that only they care about with no references, with Rachel nodding and agreeing, just shows how much they&amp;#039;re on the same page.  Letting women die?  I don&amp;#039;t seem to remember that plank in the GOP platform. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/former-dnc-communications-director-gop-supports-letting-women-die/#IDComment303921101</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : AOL/HuffPo, CNN Fooled By &#039;One Percent Tip&#039; Hoax</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/viral-one-percent-tipper-photo-a-hoax/#IDComment303920043</link>
<description>But... it fits the narrative!  It&amp;#039;s probably still true, they just don&amp;#039;t have any of that pesky &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/viral-one-percent-tipper-photo-a-hoax/#IDComment303920043</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Can NPR Legitimize Bias With New Handbook?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2012/02/28/can-npr-legitimize-bias-with-new-handbook/#IDComment303785197</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s the formula for &amp;quot;balance&amp;quot; that all the major media use.  You start off with a bleeding heart story of how Jane Doe can&amp;#039;t feed her children.  Introduce the idea of new legislation that would pay for the XXX number of people it would help.  Get one statement or point of view from a Republican or, better yet, nefarious business that opposes.  Have a whole paragraph from a Democrat who supports the spending.  Cut back to Jane Doe and how her very life depends on &amp;quot;Washington Politics&amp;quot;.  Ta da!  &amp;quot;Balance&amp;quot;.  It&amp;#039;s been going on for decades. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2012/02/28/can-npr-legitimize-bias-with-new-handbook/#IDComment303785197</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Fatal school shooting jars Ohio town</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.6a197747844bacb7b7eaa7c295412e98.41&amp;show_article=1#IDComment303316031</link>
<description>Why the list at the bottom?  Are they related somehow?  When there&amp;#039;s a car accident, do we include a list of other car accidents?  Or minority gang violence?  Do we list those, as well?  ..... This is one of those preliminary steps to gun control.  They list other atrocities that were carried out with that type of weapon.  It&amp;#039;s baiting, plain and simple. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.6a197747844bacb7b7eaa7c295412e98.41&amp;show_article=1#IDComment303316031</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama welcomes TransCanada plan for new pipeline</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T5VQIG1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment303184999</link>
<description>They&amp;#039;ll back out of this one.  &amp;quot;Compromise&amp;quot; they&amp;#039;ll call it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T5VQIG1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment303184999</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : U.S. Military Burned Bibles at Bagram in 2009</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/bshapiro/2012/02/27/u-s-military-burned-bibles-at-bagram-in-2009/#IDComment303114771</link>
<description>Afraid that they&amp;#039;d be used to convert them?  From a violent religion that is the very definition of intolerant?  By being intolerant of our own beliefs?  Endless circle of poo, this PC stuff. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/bshapiro/2012/02/27/u-s-military-burned-bibles-at-bagram-in-2009/#IDComment303114771</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Britain hits bank with $800 million tax bill</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T5T5A00&show_article=1#IDComment303060257</link>
<description>So... much like the Fed or the ECB, they bought their own debt.... and much like Earned Income Credit, non-taxpayers get taxpayer money?  Sounds completely legit to me.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T5T5A00&show_article=1#IDComment303060257</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum: JFK &#039;Church And State&#039; Speech Makes Me Throw Up</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-jfk-church-and-state-speech-makes-me-throw-up/#IDComment302393359</link>
<description>I understand the thinking of keeping it separate.  There should be no mandates that are geared specifically for or against religion.  As pointed out by someone else, above, a Muslim in office would, in Santorum&amp;#039;s world, be quite problematic.  But I consistently see a push that I find quite disgusting.  I mean, to listen to some on the Left, a person shouldn&amp;#039;t be able to hold office if they are religious.  I can just hear them, 100 years from now... &amp;quot;How can you have true separation of Church and State if have believers in myths and fairytales running government?  We don&amp;#039;t allow terrorists to join the army, why should the religious get to run our country?&amp;quot;  ... and what&amp;#039;s crazy is that people will eat that sh!t up.  Maybe Obama should say it now, so that by then, he can be quoted right next to Grant (as some moron above did).  Grant?!  Really? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-jfk-church-and-state-speech-makes-me-throw-up/#IDComment302393359</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>