<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/480465</link>
		<description>Comments by Hubie</description>
<item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Note: Mets to Erase Doc&#039;s Signature</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-mets-to-erase-docs-signature/#IDComment19439707</link>
<description>How there is not a something in the stadium commemorating the &amp;#039;69 or &amp;#039;86 teams is just unreal?  These are two great moments in Met history that fans like myself can never get enough of.  Matt:  It would be nice if you would take a firm stance agst something once in a while, instead of just appearing to be a patsy for the Mets </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-mets-to-erase-docs-signature/#IDComment19439707</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Buzz: Mets Discussing Sheffield</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18088353</link>
<description>Why are people so opposed to Sheffield?  He is a risk free option.  If it turns out he is done or just aint worth the trouble, you just cut him.  He&amp;#039;s worth the flyer. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18088353</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>