<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/313409</link>
		<description>Comments by Hope4Change</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Sunshine speeded 1940s Swiss glacier melt: scientists</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.d1adbaecf2f1d58fb3880c64655e52ea.151&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment47260908</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s a factually true statement. In one of the original IPCC reports that I read back 10 years or so, the report stated that not only was solar radiation held constant (due to their assumption that solar variance had a minor impact on the results) but the same was stated for volcanic CO2 emissions. Part of their explanation for not allowing for solar and volcanic variance was that it made the models/calculations, get this - drumroll please......TOO COMPLEX! So they basically STATED KNOWN VARIANCES AS CONSTANTS! Subsequently, as this omission was shown to be fraudulent, the IPCC made &amp;quot;minor&amp;quot; solar/volcanic adjustments but of course these did not impact the results of their study.  The original IPCC report also stated that they only completed something like 25 computer runs/iterations of the model. The reason? Computer time was too expensive! And NONE of the computer runs gave the same output - which a real scientist would understand that the model was not valid. So the IPCC &amp;quot;scientists&amp;quot; basically quit the computer model runs when their fudge factor gave the results they were looking for.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.d1adbaecf2f1d58fb3880c64655e52ea.151&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment47260908</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Study: Slowdown in warming last year not permanent</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CCLC8O0#IDComment45865792</link>
<description>Auslinda, I DEMAND you stop insulting REAL scientists by lumping con-artists (a.k.a. climatologists) as scientists!  Real scientists use real data, provide their data/calculations for skeptical review and they don&amp;#039;t promote political fraud to enrich themselves as climatologists do! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CCLC8O0#IDComment45865792</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Study: Slowdown in warming last year not permanent</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CCLC8O0#IDComment45865071</link>
<description>Auslinda is right!   They found all of those records in the ice core samples, right next to Phil Jones&amp;#039; &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; data tapes from CRU - East Anglia; on top of a set of hummer car keys, mere inches away from John Lennon&amp;#039;s lost record and below the following video that PROVES man caused global warming 11,000 years ago at the end of the last ice age:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjK8BWBsUMw&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjK8BWBsUMw&lt;/a&gt;  Auslinda; do some basic research! Ice core samples CANNOT provide direct temperature correlation. At best, the scientists can only obtain a vague, imprecise assumption of temperatures from using a proxy such as an ice core sample.   Inferred temperatures are not a valid data set (at least not for REAL scientists - but I could imagine climatologists using made up, &amp;quot;inferred&amp;quot; data!).  Example: from reading your email, I can &amp;quot;infer&amp;quot; that you failed first grade spelling! My inference of your lack of education is as valid as any ice-core sample inference of past temperature data. And who can prove me wrong? After all, I am a self-proclaimed expert who conducts my own peer review in a manner similar to AGW climatologists! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CCLC8O0#IDComment45865071</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Angry words as timetable for climate deal starts to slip</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fa40295cb0a08ec4b9d7397a9f56640.101&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42277921</link>
<description>Religion? What you talkin&amp;#039; bout willis?   Religions are based on wild conjecture (i.e. a miniscule increase in a trace gas such as CO2 will destroy the planet); require wild eyed prophets who can bless you with their presence (i.e. algore); consist of stories of global destruction and apocalypse if you do not convert (i.e. floods, hurricanes, loss of land and animal species); believers must tithe to the religious leaders (i.e. carbon credits); sinners/nonbelievers must be punished (i.e. increased taxes); a great saviour will arrive to protect us from ourselves (i.e. intrusive governement bureaucrats); consist of speakers of the truth who cannot be questioned/doubted (has any member of the sock-puppet media had the cahones to question AGW theory?).  Religion??   Oh, never mind - it looks like you&amp;#039;ve nailed it on this one! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fa40295cb0a08ec4b9d7397a9f56640.101&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42277921</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Angry words as timetable for climate deal starts to slip</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fa40295cb0a08ec4b9d7397a9f56640.101&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42277186</link>
<description>Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that&amp;#039;s even remotely true! --Homer Simpson </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fa40295cb0a08ec4b9d7397a9f56640.101&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42277186</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Angry words as timetable for climate deal starts to slip</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fa40295cb0a08ec4b9d7397a9f56640.101&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42276558</link>
<description>OMG - auslinda is warning us that the seas are RISING!! Grandma, head for the hills!!! LOL!!  &amp;quot;ELIMINATE MANMADE CO2 OR THE OCEANS WILL RISE 20 FEET!&amp;quot; screech the global warming fanatics. You just got to love it; the same group that sneers at Christians and Jews for believing in the Bible&amp;#039;s rendition of Noah&amp;#039;s flood now want us to wholeheartedly accept divinity school dropout (Albert Gore&amp;#039;s) &amp;quot;manmade global warming&amp;quot; flood story!   The irony of THAT is thick enough to reflect all of the sun&amp;#039;s global warming rays! At least Gore picked a great book to steal his global flood story from; maybe he learned something from divinity school, after all??? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fa40295cb0a08ec4b9d7397a9f56640.101&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42276558</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Angry words as timetable for climate deal starts to slip</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fa40295cb0a08ec4b9d7397a9f56640.101&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42274949</link>
<description>FEED THE TREES!! Increase your carbon footprint.   Nice motto! What do you think about:   STARVE THE SEQUOIA - ELIMINATE CO2!! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.3fa40295cb0a08ec4b9d7397a9f56640.101&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42274949</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : BREAKING: ACORN&#039;s New Orleans Office Raided by Louisiana Attorney General</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/11/06/breaking-acorns-new-orleans-office-raided-by-louisiana-attorney-generals-office/#IDComment42271758</link>
<description>GoVikes????  I say: Go Favre!!  :-) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/11/06/breaking-acorns-new-orleans-office-raided-by-louisiana-attorney-generals-office/#IDComment42271758</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : BREAKING: ACORN&#039;s New Orleans Office Raided by Louisiana Attorney General</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/11/06/breaking-acorns-new-orleans-office-raided-by-louisiana-attorney-generals-office/#IDComment42271203</link>
<description>Hey now people, tone it down a notch.   As Our Dear Leader , B. Hussein Obama stated about the &amp;quot;Allahu Akbar&amp;quot; Muslim murderer at Ft. Hood: &amp;quot;Don&amp;#039;t jump to conclusions&amp;quot;.   The same Obama principle will apply to these ACORN raids.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/11/06/breaking-acorns-new-orleans-office-raided-by-louisiana-attorney-generals-office/#IDComment42271203</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Afghan, Pakistan carnage raises heat on Obama</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.92add9d8b299aef692d2ebae569be1ca.7b1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment41136736</link>
<description>My fear is that Our Dear Leader has fallen for the hype that surrounded his presidential run and the resulting media lovefest over him.   The &amp;quot;hope for change&amp;quot; blather and &amp;quot;yes we can&amp;quot; chants; the electoral firsts of the &amp;quot;new renaissance man&amp;quot; election, the praise by America-hating dictators and European socialists and now the Nobel prize? How could he not be impacted?  BO appears to be showing signs of a Pathological Narcissist. If so, it just doesn&amp;#039;t matter to him how others are negatively impacted by his inaction. It&amp;#039;s all about &amp;quot;the man&amp;quot; himself, and the associated power that comes with the position....... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.92add9d8b299aef692d2ebae569be1ca.7b1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment41136736</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Storm dumps snow on Rockies, plains, more forecast</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BK8F982#IDComment41018741</link>
<description>Our elected officials certainly don&amp;#039;t!   How many times did algore, Robert Kennedy, the democrat party (en masse) and the self proclaimed &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; climatologists blame the destruction from hurricane Katrina on President Bush not signing Kyoto treaty? See:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/DyeHard/story?id=1121948&amp;amp;page=1&amp;amp;page=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/DyeHard/story?id...&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr/for-they-that-sow-the-win_b_6396.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr...&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0912-32.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0912-32.htm&lt;/a&gt;  I wouldn&amp;#039;t  be so quick to dismiss bloggers on this site when the so called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; and politicians are guilty of the same thing that you find to be distasteful and wrong (which it is; wrong that is).   Have you written your local climatolagist or democrat politician for defrauding the American people on the distiction of &amp;quot;climate&amp;quot; vs &amp;quot;weather&amp;quot;?   I didn&amp;#039;t think so. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BK8F982#IDComment41018741</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Afghan, Pakistan carnage raises heat on Obama</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.92add9d8b299aef692d2ebae569be1ca.7b1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment41017396</link>
<description>And the money quote from this article is: &amp;quot;Outwardly, Obama, who prides himself on thriving under pressure, appears unfazed by the quickening crisis..&amp;quot;  Yes, Obama&amp;#039;s dithering on the troop deployment is ALL ABOUT OBAMA, who obviously could care less about Americans dying in Afghanistan or the about the Afghani people.  Pride goeth before the fall; or as Proverbs 16:18 states: &amp;quot;Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.&amp;quot; Our prideful presidential imitator may yet be the fall of us all.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.92add9d8b299aef692d2ebae569be1ca.7b1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment41017396</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40758472</link>
<description>Uncle_Cracker, how can you doubt the ingenuity of prehistoric man?  Perhaps you haven&amp;#039;t seen some of the recently discovered stone age video that shows prehistoric man building the wheel for their CO2 belching Hummers, which melted the glaciers and caused floods of biblical proportion? See:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01v6EfUfdNU&amp;amp;feature=related&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01v6EfUfdNU&amp;amp;fe...&lt;/a&gt;  Stone age man was waaayyy ahead of his time (kind of like algore). He knew he was destroying the environment so he built the first NIST calibrated thermometer, took accurate temperature readings, tracking the data for eons until another group of enlightened Neanderthals such as BO and algore arrived to pull us all from the brink of manmade disaster, just in the nick of time (with you surrendering your freedoms, rights and taxdollars, of course)! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40758472</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40756691</link>
<description>Judging from the comments, it would have to be lower than 4th grade student; someone who just learned to read.   Possibly a tenured college professor in the liberal arts field or more likely Obama&amp;#039;s climate czar or maybe one of the many tax cheats promoted to Obama&amp;#039;s cabinet? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40756691</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40751674</link>
<description>Now, now child; play nice or mommy will have to unplug that typewriter of yours with the TV screen attached! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40751674</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40749678</link>
<description>Kadaka, are you telling me that there are actually more variables involved in the heating and cooling of planets than just the atmospheric concentration of CO2, or the small variance of a trace gas such as CO2 over centuries?    If so, thank you thank for validating my argument!  Gee, Venus has a CO2 concentration of 96.5%? How many ppm is THAT??  It sure is odd that so many planets have atmospheres composed of high levels of CO2. Could it be that high concentrations of CO2 is a natural occurance in planetary evolution??   Dare we fight the lords of evolution by eliminating Earth based CO2??  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40749678</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40747502</link>
<description>Roger, your arguments made it a pleasure reading this thread.    But your brilliance is being overwhelmed by ridley&amp;#039;s inanity. It&amp;#039;s that old saying about arguing with a fool....but kudos to you for the attempt :-) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40747502</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40501282</link>
<description>Bubbaraper666 - here are some science facts you might want to chew on: 390 ppm is 0.039%, indicative of a trace element. Do you truly believe a 0.012% change in a trace gas in 100 years in a constantly changing environment will lead to global warming destruction on Earth?   If so, then perhaps you can prove to me why Mars is a fozen blob, knowing that CO2 in Mars&amp;#039; atmosphere is at a 95% concentration (950,000 ppm)??   If CO2 is such a dangerous &amp;quot;global warming gas&amp;quot;, then why is 390 ppm on  Earth cataclysmic but 950,000 ppm on Mars irrelevent to heating and actually COOLING the planet???   Think about it: 950,000 ppm vs 390 ppm CO2. Mars&amp;#039; atmosphere is 2,435 TIMES the concentration of Earth&amp;#039;s atmospheric concentration of CO2, yet Mars&amp;#039; avereage temperature is -80F.  Quite the dangerous global warming pollutant, no?  So where&amp;#039;s the correlation?? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40501282</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40491774</link>
<description>BO&amp;#039;s multiple teleprompters would flame out if that debate were to occur!  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40491774</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40489677</link>
<description>And uh.....Albert Arnold Gore Jr is a divinity school dropout, a defeated presidential candidate (AKA POLITICIAN - NOT  SCIENTIST) and a useless ex-VP (AKA POLITICIAN - NOT SCIENTIST) who traipses around the world in a learjet, lives in an energy sucking mansion and is laughing all the way to the bank with millions of $$ of &amp;quot;carbon credits&amp;quot;.  And why is it Bubbaraper666 falls for his global warming con??? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40489677</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>