<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1490796</link>
		<description>Comments by HollyweirdRitey</description>
<item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Democratic Party Prostitute May Be Next Mayor of Vicksburg</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/democratic-party-prostitute-may-be-next-mayor-of-vicksburg/#IDComment620478536</link>
<description>It seems only natural that prostitution would qualify one for democrat party politics </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/democratic-party-prostitute-may-be-next-mayor-of-vicksburg/#IDComment620478536</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : The Rachel Corrie The New York Times Doesn’t Want You to See</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/the-rachel-corrie-the-new-york-times-doesnt-want-you-to-see/#IDComment600014408</link>
<description>Too bad there were not more &amp;quot;wonderful ISM terrorist human beings&amp;quot; behind the bulldozer that day </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/the-rachel-corrie-the-new-york-times-doesnt-want-you-to-see/#IDComment600014408</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : LA Times editor stepping down after 4 years</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RJU7SG0&show_article=1#IDComment237338578</link>
<description>The LA times deserves its fate. I know countless residents of LA who cancelled subscriptions and never renewed over the last 15 years. The Times&amp;#039;  anti-Isreal and left wing bias became so unbearable and that combined with the digital age has done them in.  They arrogantly ignored and continue to ignore former subcribers  when many made it clear about their objection to the Times serious biases..good riddance. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RJU7SG0&show_article=1#IDComment237338578</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Daddy-In-Chief: Obama Scolds, Compares Congress to Malia and Sasha</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/daddy-in-chief-obama-scolds-compares-congress-to-malia-and-sasha/#IDComment168439107</link>
<description>I like how they edited out his golf clubs sitting up at the podium, while he telling &amp;quot;congress to get their work done&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/daddy-in-chief-obama-scolds-compares-congress-to-malia-and-sasha/#IDComment168439107</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Dana Milbank Speaks of Shanda (Embarrassment) But Acts Like Just Another Progressive Schmendrik (Stu</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2011/06/20/dana-milbank-speaks-of-shanda-embarrassment-but-acts-like-just-another-progressive-schmednrik-stupid-person/#IDComment165164501</link>
<description>Irony of ironies...Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin and George Bush are better Jews than Soros and Millbank....that&amp;#039;s the real Shanda! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2011/06/20/dana-milbank-speaks-of-shanda-embarrassment-but-acts-like-just-another-progressive-schmednrik-stupid-person/#IDComment165164501</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Credit Where It&#039;s Due: Chris Matthews Objectively Praises Bachmann Debate Peformance</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/06/15/credit-where-its-due-chris-matthews-objectively-praises-bachmann-debate-peformance/#IDComment163013964</link>
<description>Matthews insults Palin by praising Bachman.and still didn&amp;#039;t apologize for calling Bachman &amp;quot;a bubble head&amp;quot; a few months ago did he? He&amp;#039;s deranged, Get him off the air so he can hang out with his old anti-Semite leftist boss Jimmy Carter. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/06/15/credit-where-its-due-chris-matthews-objectively-praises-bachmann-debate-peformance/#IDComment163013964</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Leonard Nimoy: Spock Wants to Divide Jerusalem</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/epokroy/2011/06/15/leonard-nimoy-spock-wants-to-divide-jerusalem/#IDComment163009431</link>
<description>Sorry, Spock lost me as being quite illogical and a Jew troubled with his religious tradition when he did a photo book a few years back  of naked women wearing (holy) Jewish prayer phalachteries. Its wasn&amp;#039;t art - it was garbage and deliberately anti-religious and provocative. Taking Nimoy&amp;#039;s opinion seriously on this is like giving the piss Christ Artist serious consideration about how the  Pope should run the Vatican. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/epokroy/2011/06/15/leonard-nimoy-spock-wants-to-divide-jerusalem/#IDComment163009431</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Gene Simmons: Sorry I Voted for &#039;Unqualified&#039; Obama</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/awrhawkins/2011/06/15/gene-simmons-sorry-i-voted-for-unqualified-obama/#IDComment163007407</link>
<description>Hey let&amp;#039;s not be too hard on Gene...at least he&amp;#039;s saying it now...unfortunately, a lot of our electorate is/was the same way...what we need are about 6 or 7 more celebs willing to say the same thing on camera and then edit  all the footage into one &amp;quot;I regret Obama&amp;quot; PSA for 2012 election. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/awrhawkins/2011/06/15/gene-simmons-sorry-i-voted-for-unqualified-obama/#IDComment163007407</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : New Hollywood Production Code: Leftist Reeducation of Tracy Morgan Marches On</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/awrhawkins/2011/06/14/new-hollywood-production-code-leftist-reeducation-of-tracy-morgan-marches-on/#IDComment162923764</link>
<description>I doubt he&amp;#039;s either a true ideological liberal or conservative...he&amp;#039;s just a dumb comedian, certainly  funny sometimes..but made the mistake speaking heresy in the lefty club in Hollywood where you have to drink the stalinist kool aid and enjoy it or else be run out of town on a rail, re-educated and made an example of by doing an event for big brother. Talk about bullying..... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/awrhawkins/2011/06/14/new-hollywood-production-code-leftist-reeducation-of-tracy-morgan-marches-on/#IDComment162923764</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Weinergate:  Once More Into the Fray; Congressman Plans Another Press Conference This Afternoon</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/weinergate-once-more-into-the-fray-congressman-plans-another-press-conference-this-afternoon/#IDComment158308596</link>
<description>Sorry, but blaming this on Breitbart won&amp;#039;t work. The logical assumption is that the owner of the twitter account is responsible for sending the photo until other facts prove otherwise, not the other way around. Because Weiner is a federal official, this has to be thoroughly investigated - something you&amp;#039;d think Weiner would want if he&amp;#039;s indeed innocent. Add-in that his story keeps changing, and there is reason to believe he&amp;#039;s not being entirely truthful about this. That&amp;#039;s not to say he necessarily sent it. Perhaps he was irresponsible with his password, who knows, but it has to be investigated.  Thank God for Andrew Breitbart exposing the hypocrisy of the left leaning media. They cover for (or don&amp;#039;t cover news) when it is &amp;quot;their guy,&amp;quot; but ruthlessly go after conservatives. You and MSN are really quite ridiculous blaming Breitbart for Weiner&amp;#039;s own responsibility for his Twitter account. Pretty silly. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/weinergate-once-more-into-the-fray-congressman-plans-another-press-conference-this-afternoon/#IDComment158308596</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Why Jews Support the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/27/why-jews-support-the-democratic-party/#IDComment157238361</link>
<description>Well said Eric and your clarifications all ring  true. I find &amp;quot;plopping&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;country club&amp;quot; perhaps unecessarily insulting of our co-religionists...on the other hand, I think Mr. Sayet had to make his point more forcefully by making these generalizations. Truth is that the the more religious a Jew is the more likely he is to be politically and morally conservative, with some exceptions of course. And since being Jewish was originally  defined by its belief in a monothestic morality giving God and justice..where does that leave those who have abondoned it in regards to their &amp;quot;Jewish identity.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 09:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/27/why-jews-support-the-democratic-party/#IDComment157238361</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Why Jews Support the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/27/why-jews-support-the-democratic-party/#IDComment157232977</link>
<description>That Category  would be &amp;quot;Traitors to their religion and to America&amp;quot; A true disgrace. Your Orwellian name &amp;quot;Young Jewish Proud&amp;quot; is pretty repulsive to those of us who take Judaism and justice seriously. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 08:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/27/why-jews-support-the-democratic-party/#IDComment157232977</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Democrat Rep. Jan Schakowsky Calls Andrew Breitbart A &#039;Sleaze Bag&#039;-Wants To Ban Critical Media</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2011/05/20/democrat-rep-jan-schakowsky-calls-andrew-breitbart-a-sleaze-bag-wants-to-ban-critical-media/#IDComment154277253</link>
<description>Typical left wing totalitarian. Wants to silence those who disagree with her (and show her for the fool she is) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 07:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2011/05/20/democrat-rep-jan-schakowsky-calls-andrew-breitbart-a-sleaze-bag-wants-to-ban-critical-media/#IDComment154277253</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama Urges Israel to Go Back to 1967 Borders</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-urges-israel-to-go-back-to-1967-borders/#IDComment154274998</link>
<description>oops I meant January 2013 </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 07:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-urges-israel-to-go-back-to-1967-borders/#IDComment154274998</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama Urges Israel to Go Back to 1967 Borders</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-urges-israel-to-go-back-to-1967-borders/#IDComment154249735</link>
<description>On the good side, I think this clinches it. Obama is toast. I think all but the most radical liberal Jews will abandoned him in 2012, that not only means their votes, but their fundraising efforts and influence. Thank God for the Christian right, who continues to be Israel&amp;#039;s best friends. If israel can hold on until January 2012, everything will be fine. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 05:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-urges-israel-to-go-back-to-1967-borders/#IDComment154249735</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Militant Feminists Stage &#039;SlutWalk&#039; Protest in Boston</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/militant-feminists-stage-slutwalk-protest-in-boston/#IDComment153375868</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t suggest how the victim dreses is &amp;quot;a defense&amp;quot; for rapist. As a conservative, I want the (forcible) rapist to get a maximum sentence.  I just want these narccisitic self absorbed women to behave with common sense. You know the world doesn&amp;#039;t resolve around them and their little temper tantrums. I don&amp;#039;t walk through bad neighborhoods with tons of jewlery on. I lock my house. I don&amp;#039;t leave my keys in my car, and I don&amp;#039;t yell fire in crowded theater. It&amp;#039;s a hassle to keep my wallet in my front pocket in a crowded square where there may be pickpockets, but I do all these things because I&amp;#039;m a grown-up. The cop just told these women a tip that would help them. They should act like grown ups...but this event is the most chidish thing I&amp;#039;ve seen in a while. Not surprising most &amp;quot;feminism&amp;quot; is infantalizes women. Most men won&amp;#039;t admit deep down they have little respect for it, </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/militant-feminists-stage-slutwalk-protest-in-boston/#IDComment153375868</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Killing Yesterday’s Man</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/pgeller/2011/05/02/killing-yesterdays-man/#IDComment153367371</link>
<description>sorry i&amp;#039;ve been out for a while..in response  You compare many apples to oranges 1) Japan acted immorally and illegally employing strarvation, real torturre against prisoners of war. To compare that to how the US treated enemy combatents with enhanced interogation (no permananet physical or psychological harm) is kind of silly.I am sure many Japanese Pow&amp;#039;s would have loved to have had loud music played, pulled up by their lapels and asked to &amp;quot;talk,&amp;quot; made to stand on one foot or even be waterboarded (US way), than how they were actually  treated by the Japanese barbarians.  2) Again Woodrow Wilson clearly acted illegally against Amercian citizens who were political enemies, W did not act illegally against ememy combatants....not at all the same thing at all  3) Although we were not arguing the merits of the Patriot act, it has been an effective, emergency procedure that is temporary and subject to renewal  to keep us safe from terrorists,,,you worry about the slippery slope enough to condemn it...I and many Americans who been kept safe are more ambivalent than so absolute on it. Much of its different provisions have been upheld by the supreme court, that being said I would be uncomfortable if it were not subject to renewal as a check and balance on it,  4) Again you want &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot;evidience that &amp;quot;enhanced interogation works&amp;quot;. I&amp;#039;ve made that case and no amount of evidience I could ever show you would change your mind. There&amp;#039;s plenty of common sense and information out there that indicates it could and does work in certain cases. If the control is that only the president can authorize it under specific circumtances in national security matters, I and most Amercians are Ok with that...you I know are not and we just have to agree to disagree. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/pgeller/2011/05/02/killing-yesterdays-man/#IDComment153367371</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Joy Behar: Rick Santorum &#039;Seems Like a Big Homophobe&#039; </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/joy-behar-rick-santorum-seems-like-a-big-homophobe/#IDComment153341780</link>
<description>This left&amp;#039;s  name calling is just a way to smear opponents and stifle meaningful debate. So what if that loudmouth Joy Behar called Rick Santorum a &amp;quot;Homophobe.&amp;quot; A meaningless term meant to stifle debate. Does it man he won&amp;#039;t hire a gay? Does it mean if a gay makes a pass at him he&amp;#039;ll recoil? Does it mean he&amp;#039;s afraid of gays and runs away? It&amp;#039;s just  ridiculous . Does it mean he won&amp;#039;t allow his children to watch gay porno videos? He should say &amp;quot;If it means I have a principalled stand on marriage according to my Catholic teaching, then yes I am  homophobe.&amp;quot; The left&amp;#039;s use of Orwellian language is something we on the right should challenge more. GIngrich messed up throwing Ryan under the bus on Gregory&amp;#039;s show, but one thing he got right was when he challenged Gregory about his accusation that he used a the &amp;quot;racially coded&amp;quot; term &amp;quot;food stamp president.&amp;quot; Gingrich really gave it to him and that was refreshing. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 08:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/joy-behar-rick-santorum-seems-like-a-big-homophobe/#IDComment153341780</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Militant Feminists Stage &#039;SlutWalk&#039; Protest in Boston</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/militant-feminists-stage-slutwalk-protest-in-boston/#IDComment150212688</link>
<description>It is not true or intellectually honest to say rape is only a crime of violence and not sex. Of course, sex is a component.I t has a component of both. Also please cite some real evidence that dressing in a highly sexually charged way doesn&amp;#039;t encourage more rape than otherwise. People with centuries of common sense know differently and some biased left wing agenda study isn&amp;#039;t going to change that. Lastly, American and western women  have more rights and freedoms than any in history, perhaps even more than men at this point (please look into divorce and civil law system in US) So if this protest was against  the middle eastern society&amp;#039;s  lack of women&amp;#039;s rights,  I&amp;#039;d have more respect for it, but its just radical leftist, feminist narcisism. These particular women are angry spoiled brats who deserve no respect. Turns out most of them are ugly too and that makes sense, since that is probably another component for their anger. This event was just a replacement event for another vulgar Vagina Monolouges show. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 06:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/militant-feminists-stage-slutwalk-protest-in-boston/#IDComment150212688</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Killing Yesterday’s Man</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/pgeller/2011/05/02/killing-yesterdays-man/#IDComment150194748</link>
<description>Reason,  1)You know why we don&amp;#039;t use these techniques against drug dealers, child molesters etc Because we have a constitution that grants the right against self -incrimintation for US citizens. No one is advocating that. Its a bogus over reach argument to bring it up about enhanced interogation effectiveness on enemy combattants.  2) No one claimed it works all the time in every case, and that they used them on everyone before they released them. They were carefully administered selectively.and of course, it&amp;#039;s going to get useful information once in a while that can be pieced togetther with other useful intelligence - sometime years later. Again that&amp;#039;s common sense.  3) If you are hell bent against  believing something, short of video &amp;quot;proving it&amp;quot;, nothing will convince you of the obvious. Even then you&amp;#039;ll probably say its doctored. so I am afraid it is pointless to continue this discussion. Not sure I could convince you there was a moon landing by the number of bars and proofs you do and will continue to erect.  4) Inevitably, more and more information will come out.  Enhanced interogation reputation will be rehabilitated. Like you I believe we have a lot of incompetant  and sneaky bumblers who cover their mistakes in our government, but I do believe our intelligence services were pretty good during W&amp;#039;s admin and in the intelligence and military areas they remain competent if not perfect. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 04:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/pgeller/2011/05/02/killing-yesterdays-man/#IDComment150194748</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>