<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/4159531</link>
		<description>Comments by Highstreet27</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ron Paul, Republican King of Celebrity Endorsements: Does This Mean Change for Liberal Hollywood?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment281790493</link>
<description>Keep letting the warfare/welfare MSM make your decisions about a candidate. If you are gullible enough to fall for their crap, then you deserve the America you get. Have fun getting McCained again with Mitt or Newt. O will just walk all over them because they have no credibility from all their flipflops. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment281790493</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ron Paul, Republican King of Celebrity Endorsements: Does This Mean Change for Liberal Hollywood?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment281787966</link>
<description>I was speaking about the Dem primary where O is running unopposed.   And yes, they said the same thing about Reagan bringing over democrats. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment281787966</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ron Paul, Republican King of Celebrity Endorsements: Does This Mean Change for Liberal Hollywood?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275952286</link>
<description>Paul is the only candidate who actually beats O with independents, and in NH he stole 18% of O&amp;#039;s vote.  Reagan democrats are joining Paul in flocks. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275952286</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ron Paul, Republican King of Celebrity Endorsements: Does This Mean Change for Liberal Hollywood?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275950992</link>
<description>1975...Reagan-&amp;quot;the heart of conservatism is libertarianism&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275950992</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ron Paul, Republican King of Celebrity Endorsements: Does This Mean Change for Liberal Hollywood?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275949581</link>
<description>George W ran on Paul&amp;#039;s foreign policy. You don&amp;#039;t understand anything. No nation building and no policing the world is the only conservative position.   Mitt and Newt have joined the Liberal failed policies. They are also the isolationists. Our best weapon to bring freedom to Cuba and Iran is thru the Free Market.  Liberal interventionist ideas bring us Islamic Regimes like in Iraq and Egypt. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275949581</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ron Paul, Republican King of Celebrity Endorsements: Does This Mean Change for Liberal Hollywood?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275946068</link>
<description>Paul doesn&amp;#039;t think it should be legal everywhere. He thinks it shouldn&amp;#039;t be Government approved, but rather only the church should handle marriage. Stop spewing your misunderstandings. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275946068</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ron Paul, Republican King of Celebrity Endorsements: Does This Mean Change for Liberal Hollywood?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275943136</link>
<description>What a joke. Paul is the only one on the stage who actually votes the way he speaks. And any person who looks at his record sees that.   You are listening to Beck&amp;#039;s conspiracies too much. Paul would never support Soros&amp;#039;s stooges if he knew who they were. Beck&amp;#039;s 6 degrees game can be proven with anyone in politics just like Kevin Bacon. wise Up! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment275943136</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ron Paul, Republican King of Celebrity Endorsements: Does This Mean Change for Liberal Hollywood?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment273616767</link>
<description>This article is pretty interesting in that it highlights that Paul is probably the only electable conservative on the stage.  He&amp;#039;s the only one who can bring the Independents and Reagan Democrats over.  Santorum keeps mentioning them, but he doesn&amp;#039;t get their vote in any of the polls or primaries so far.  Shoot, Paul got almost 20% of the vote in the Democratic primary in NH (as a write in).    Did someone say we are looking for a way to get Obama out of office?  Paul just stole 20% of Obama&amp;#039;s voters in a Northeastern stronghold.  The only other candidate able to do that was Reagan. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/01/24/ron-paul-republican-king-of-celebrity-endorsements-does-this-mean-change-for-liberal-hollywood/#IDComment273616767</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Information Clearing House - News you won&#039;t find on CNN : &nbsp;Noam Chomsky on Ron Paul : Information Clearing House</title>
<link>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30251.htm#IDComment266101294</link>
<description>Thinking that Paul would watch someone die outside a hospital is the opposite of what he actually does in his own life.  He has given many a person who couldn&amp;#039;t afford care their procedure for free.  He started out as a volunteer in a Christian charity hospital where no one was turned away.    Paul is the only one who is not the Status Quo.  Do a little research and you will find that to be true. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30251.htm#IDComment266101294</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Mossad agents posed as CIA in operation: report</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0a48dca029ea3800c6e534eab94e8d0d.cb1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment263772478</link>
<description>Exactly, Eeriemoon. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0a48dca029ea3800c6e534eab94e8d0d.cb1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment263772478</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Taking Heat: Ron Paul Walks Out Of CNN Interview</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/taking-heat-ron-paul-walks-out-of-cnn-interview/#IDComment248749408</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s the full interview:  &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch\?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0&lt;/a&gt;  I wonder if Breitbart will publish it? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/taking-heat-ron-paul-walks-out-of-cnn-interview/#IDComment248749408</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>