<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/303821</link>
		<description>Comments by Hesperado</description>
<item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: UK\&#039;s ruling Labour Party, seeking Muslim votes, to ease up on Islamic jihadists and go</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027234.php#IDComment30826623</link>
<description>The reason is that whites have been deemed to be uniquely evil.  This would not be much of a problem if it were confined merely to the Left.  It becomes a major problem insofar as the majority of Conservatives and Centrists throughout West have succumbed to this, through PC MC.  Without their enablement, it would not enjoy the traction and influence it does enjoy.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027234.php#IDComment30826623</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: UK\&#039;s ruling Labour Party, seeking Muslim votes, to ease up on Islamic jihadists and go</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027234.php#IDComment30793714</link>
<description>On-topic and directly related to this, is a good analysis by Lawrence Auster of a similar situation in Holland:          &lt;b&gt;Dutch police, after years of ignoring Muslim crime against the Dutch, crack down on the Dutch for threatening Muslims &lt;/b&gt;          &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/013939.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/013939.html&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027234.php#IDComment30793714</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: UK\&#039;s ruling Labour Party, seeking Muslim votes, to ease up on Islamic jihadists and go</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027234.php#IDComment30784983</link>
<description>Racism is very much alive and well today -- not as a science, and only rarely in one of its traditional forms of an ideology purveyed by various white groups.  It is now alive and well as an ideology of the Left and of Muslim Apologists, and most of its precepts have also filtered down into the general mainstream via the amorphous yet powerful sociopolitical process called PC MC.    Thus, the comment of maxpublius above -- &amp;quot;Preserving a culture--it&amp;#039;s people, ideas, and land--is not racism. &amp;quot;    Unfortunately, according to the dictates of PC MC, preserving a culture -- its people, ideas, and land -- is racism when white people do it, but it is not racism when non-whites do it.  That&amp;#039;s the overwhelming political reality in which we live today.  And it is directly enabling the Islamic Jihad in the West.  It would not be enabling Islamic Jihad in the West if most Muslims were not &amp;quot;ethnic&amp;quot;.  If most Muslims were white, this would not be an issue.  The PC MC West would have shut their ideology down in a heartbeat by now.  That&amp;#039;s the blunt but unavoidable fact of the matter.  For more, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2008/09/race-factor-difference-between.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Race Factor: The difference between reality, and political reality&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027234.php#IDComment30784983</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\&#039;s Islamic Defenders Front: &quot;Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30780185</link>
<description>Ummm, 2,036 comments.  Houston, we have a problem.  Jihad Watch needs to shut down &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;NOW&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and evacuate in an orderly fashion.  Do not return into the building until the fire marshals have determined that the instantdebate threat has been neutralized. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30780185</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: An exchange with an Islamic scholar</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30733184</link>
<description>Even if he did hear from Bassiouni again, something tells me it would result in more obfuscations &amp;amp; tap-dancing, salted with more aggrieved prickliness and peppered with every logical fallacy in the book.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30733184</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: &quot;Moderate&quot; Tariq Ramadan hosts talk show on Iranian state television</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027215.php#IDComment30725663</link>
<description>Another interesting thing about this:  Tariq Ramadan and the Muslim Brotherhood are Sunnis, and yet he is working with the Shia Iranian regime: Sunnis and Shia are not always in conflict; sometimes they work together against their common enemy -- us.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027215.php#IDComment30725663</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: An exchange with an Islamic scholar</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30724023</link>
<description>There is, however, the matter of the Two-Step maneuver Bassiouini has to fall back on (the same Two-Step which Leftists also use), which Spencer didn&amp;#039;t address:      &amp;quot;My position on apostasy has been expressed as early as 1983, namely that at the time of the Prophet it was not considered as only changing one&amp;rsquo;s mind but that it was the equivalent of joining the enemy and thus constituting high treason.&amp;quot;      I.e. --       Step One:  First the apologist claims there is nothing there -- no death penalty for apostasy      then when people call him on it with the facts, he moves to       Step Two:  Oh, there is something there, but it&amp;#039;s something else -- why, it&amp;#039;s not apostasy, it&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;high treason&amp;quot;!      This is essentially the same Two-Step maneuver used in other similar circumstances when Islamic terrorism -- which is at first denied to exist -- is then admitted to exist when the facts can no longer be denied, but is then magically transformed into &amp;quot;restive&amp;quot; &amp;quot;resistance movements&amp;quot; against &amp;quot;oppression&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;long-standing grievances&amp;quot; in a &amp;quot;context of a cycle of violence&amp;quot; caused by a breakdown in the sociopolitical order due to fallout from Western Colonialism &amp;quot;interfering&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;the region&amp;quot;.      Bassiouni&amp;#039;s Two-Step tap-dance can be easily dispensed with:  the modern world no longer accepts a concept of &amp;quot;high treason&amp;quot; based upon religion and upon religious choices.  Now, if only the modern world would step up to the plate and actually enforce what it believes in, we might have on our hands something actually quite relevant, rational and humane to define (and punish:  &amp;quot;Mr. Bassiouini, please get your papers and luggage in order...&amp;quot;) as &lt;i&gt;high treason&lt;/i&gt;... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30724023</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: An exchange with an Islamic scholar</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30723409</link>
<description>&amp;quot;I also think Professor Bassiouni is saying &amp;quot;In my version of Islamic law, conversion to Christianity is not punishable by death.&amp;quot; This may well be true...&amp;quot;  But he didn&amp;#039;t say that, because he&amp;#039;s trying to pull the wool over our eyes -- which is easy, since the entire West is so full of sheep these days.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30723409</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: An exchange with an Islamic scholar</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30723020</link>
<description>Funny how these anti-American &amp;amp; anti-Western gasbags have such long titles -- like Professor Henry Louis Gates, &amp;quot;Chair of the Department of African and African American Studies and Director of the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30723020</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: An exchange with an Islamic scholar</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30722863</link>
<description>A well-written anecdote.  These kinds of reports of &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; Muslims need to be blogged more and more. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30722863</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: An exchange with an Islamic scholar</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30715538</link>
<description>Professor Bassiouni is too &amp;quot;Distinguished&amp;quot; to worry about facts on the ground. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30715538</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: An exchange with an Islamic scholar</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30707143</link>
<description>That &amp;quot;Distinguished&amp;quot; is apparently his official title at DePaul University -- but notice how he used that word to describe other Muslim scholars he claims have been criticizing the 4 schools --  &amp;quot;I and a number of other distinguished Muslim scholars have long criticized the views of the four traditional Sunni schools. &amp;quot;  In that quote, he&amp;#039;s using the word in its unofficial sense, which comes off smelling silly and juvenile. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30707143</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Mohammed most popular boy\&#039;s name in four biggest Dutch cities</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027220.php#IDComment30702611</link>
<description>Or better yet:  &amp;quot;a common strategy to deport all Muslims as soon as possible -- even if that means in 75 to 100 years from now.&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027220.php#IDComment30702611</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Mohammed most popular boy\&#039;s name in four biggest Dutch cities</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027220.php#IDComment30702452</link>
<description>In fact, we need to work toward the goal of complete deportation of all Muslims, including those who have become citizens of the West.  Nothing short of that will do, for our long-term safety. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027220.php#IDComment30702452</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: An exchange with an Islamic scholar</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30701784</link>
<description>Another interesting thing that can be gleaned, aside from the glaring logical error Spencer caught, in Professor Bassiouni&amp;#039;s attempted counter-argument:  When he writes that -- &amp;quot;I and a number of other distinguished Muslim scholars have long criticized the views of the four traditional Sunni schools&amp;quot; -- he is inadvertently revealing that those four schools are &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; in fact a dead letter today, but elicit, and require, the conscientious opposition of scholars like him.    Unless, of course, he means that he and other scholars have &amp;quot;long criticized&amp;quot; the views of the four schools for purely antiquarian reasons -- sort of like many Western scholars at various universities united in a concerted and long-term effort to criticize the Domesday Book of William the Conqueror or the Code of Hammurabai, purely for reasons of historical interest in dusty old laws that have nothing at all to do with current society today.  Yeah right, and I&amp;#039;m the uncle of apes and swine.    Another indication of the current relevance of those four schools --  Professor Bassiouni himself said that he felt obligated to submit a written document to the Court in Kabul in the Abdul Rahman apostasy case.  Can anyone imagine any Christian scholar today feeling the need to weigh in on a court case involving laws from the early middle ages being enacted in any Western country on the planet ?  Of course not.  This only is a problem when we deal with Muslim societies.    As long as &amp;quot;distinguished&amp;quot; Muslims like Professor Bassiouni continue to bristle with their prickly pique everytime reasonable criticisms are raised about the outrageous conduct of Muslims all over the globe, we will -- &lt;i&gt;at the very least&lt;/i&gt; -- remain suspicious of their motives. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027221.php#IDComment30701784</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\&#039;s Islamic Defenders Front: &quot;Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30687242</link>
<description>By the way, anybody who has responded to any of my comments lately will likely not get a response from me, due to the fact that Jihad Watch comments are a heap of smoking ruins, and it&amp;#039;s way too difficult to pick through the rubble and wreckage to find any of my previous comments and the threads they were in, since of course InstantDebacle isn&amp;#039;t providing one of its services it is supposed to -- to wit, allowing you to link back to the precise place where someone has responded to one of your comments. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30687242</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\&#039;s Islamic Defenders Front: &quot;Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30687091</link>
<description>Wow -- this thread now has over 970 comments!  And it&amp;#039;s safe to say that over 90% of them are irrelevant to the article.  Why is InstantDebacle getting even &lt;i&gt;worse&lt;/i&gt;!?  It seems strange and possibly fishy that it is spiralling out of control so monumentally -- particularly after Spencer announced he is ditching it.  Perhaps the InstantDebacle team are really friends of Charles Johnson, and he cleverly found a way to hack Jihad Watch through them -- or maybe they don&amp;#039;t exist at all and are just a dummy service created by CJ?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30687091</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\&#039;s Islamic Defenders Front: &quot;Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30686812</link>
<description>This Djibouti thug should be punished in a pillory for his crimes against the English language, at the very least. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30686812</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\&#039;s Islamic Defenders Front: &quot;Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30685017</link>
<description>nakal, you have a lot to learn about Islam.  The Koran is only one half of what is important to Muslims.  Muslims -- 85% of the world&amp;#039;s 1.3 billion -- also follow the Sunna &lt;i&gt;in addition to&lt;/i&gt; the Koran.  The other 15%, the Shia, have their own version of the Sunna (which includes a great deal of what Sunnis use, including the Sahih Ahadith).  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30685017</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\&#039;s Islamic Defenders Front: &quot;Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30668355</link>
<description>Two days ago, August 11, Spencer finally took time out of his busy schedule to tell us that he is aware of the InstantDebacle problem and that he is going to change the comments system &amp;quot;soon&amp;quot;.  This belated notice came to us after a good month of inreasingly escalating problems with InstantDebate.  Perhaps Spencer doesn&amp;#039;t appreciate the nature of Jihad Watch comments -- how it functions as a thriving &lt;i&gt;community&lt;/i&gt; of people concerned about the problem of Islam; how furthermore this community helps to make this site Jihad Watch a dynamic interactive site and not merely a boring newsfeed; and finally how this community helps his book sales.  The community dimension of JW comments has effectively become crippled.  It is now in ruins because of IntenseDebacle.          &lt;b&gt;Spencer should treat this as an emergency, stop everything else, suspend Jihad Watch immediately while he switches over to a new system -- NOW.  &lt;/b&gt;     All here in favor say &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30668355</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>