en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/360218 Comments by Hades http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.60b96f71bf4ba4781f8a5d3a49a22a0e.4a1#IDComment31963874 Hahaha! That's funny! The school can't really do that. It's a private communication device. The school has ZERO business monitoring what the kids are getting on their cell phones. If they are, it's really a ploy by the dirty administrative staff to get the opportunity to look at the little girls they see everyday naked on cell phones, in messages intended for someone else, under the pretense of "policy". The school CAN, however and should, ban the use of cell phones period. Or have a place at the front of the class room where all of the kids have to put their phones during class, a la, the teacher's desk. Penalties and punishment for failure to comply. Pretty simple and does not violate anyone's privacy. Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:34:09 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.60b96f71bf4ba4781f8a5d3a49a22a0e.4a1#IDComment31963874 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99F5CG80#IDComment27444544 Then you would have nothing but chickens and cows, cooking shows and talk shows to watch. Oh wait, that;s all you watch anyway. Without California, the rest of the country would go insane. No entertainment. No computers. No gossip. Just politics. Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:17:13 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99F5CG80#IDComment27444544 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99EDR600#IDComment27386874 I'm not an atheist. I just believe in myself. Obviously your intellect to judge what is right and wrong is so pathetically weak, that you must look to something that is greater than yourself. Whereas many of the tenements of the text you read bear general benefit, it fails in that people use it as a tool of injustice; "A sanctioned chance to judge and to condemn". Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:28:11 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99EDR600#IDComment27386874 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98SI2J00#IDComment24661171 One day sex will cease to be an issue. Republicans, Democrats, Liberals, everyone screws around because everyone needs and wants to get screwed. I personally don't care who the guy or anyone has sex with. That's no one's business as long as they are running their elected positions according to their post. Some people feel like their getting screwed when they're really not and what they really want is to get screwed. Usually the person who wants to get screwed is upset because the person who usually screws them isn't but is screwing someone else. Perhaps if people were better at screwing then people might not get bored and want to screw someone else. Probably the person screwing someone feels like their getting screwed because they're not getting screwed as often as they should so they go screw someone else. Then the person who should have been screwing better feels screwed because now they're not getting screwed and then they complain. It appears that the ones who are upset the most about getting screwed over are not getting screwed screwed up the first time and stopped screwing right all to begin with. Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:05:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98SI2J00#IDComment24661171 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment24091317 See my last comment in response to yours. Again! You point to specifics and compare them to my generalities. The Foster Care system is not meant to bring ill repute to children, but to help them. there will always be those children in the system who are strong and will pull through whatever hell is thrown at them. But many of them don't. And it is the many to which I refer. The ones who are not strong and cannot make it. They become dredges on society. Life is cherry for the strong and willful and those with drive. Not all children are born with that strength. Stop denying that the world is not perfect and face reality. That's all I'm telling you. Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:05:45 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment24091317 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23996947 Technically, they are already living cells before fertilization. Biologically, a baby is a parasite. Simple scientific fact. Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:38:30 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23996947 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23996382 What's really incoherent is your ability to read. You are deluded if you think every child that is out there is loved. You know those Child Services programs and Foster Care programs that are continually on the chopping block of the budgets. Yeah, those! Those are state and federally funded programs paid for with tax dollars. Tax dollars means support of the entire community. Personally, I don't have a problem paying these taxes. We need some form of these programs, but the reason these programs exist is because there are children out there that need the care of the state through some accident or neglience and they are the innocent victims. Being aborted, they might be a victim once. Living a life in Hell, they are victims over and over and over again. Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:31:08 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23996382 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23994794 That's not what I said. That's what you want to think I said. If the family will love those kids, they will find a way to survive. Where there is a will, there is a way. Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:20:38 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23994794 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23981403 Exact circumstances? You are reading what you want into my comment. If anyone else sides with your last comment to mine, you are ALL reading this wrong. Barack's mother decided that she had the LOVE and ABILITY to raise Barack and was willing to do so and do whatever it required to raise that child. My comment is about those who have decided that they DO NOT have the ability to raise children. These latter children should be spared the cold and misery of Hell on Earth. If a mother or father decides they will love that child, then by all means, have that child. But don't force someone to bring a child into this world who will not have the capacity or the ability to love that child. THAT is cruel and evil. Not only to the people who are trying to be responsible citizens and NOT burden the community with a child that they do not have the means to care for, but mostly to the child, who suffers the greatest and for years will not understand why no one loves them. They who would become innocent victims of misguided ideology. When those children are abused, hungry lost and forlon, they ask "Why doesn't God help me?" What do you say? " Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:31:33 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23981403 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98NEFSO0#IDComment23824589 Ah Yes! Swift self justice! I love it. That saves everyone lots of time and money. This was the pragmatic solution. Come to Hades! I have a special place just for you! Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:46:32 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98NEFSO0#IDComment23824589 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23824220 That has nothing to do with this comment. Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:40:17 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23824220 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23780750 Again! Are you going to reach into YOUR VERY OWN POCKET and pay for these chidlren to live, grow up and be healthy? Or do you just support them being born and caged in orphanages, passed around from foster home to foster home, molester to molester? You conservatives might think I'm cold and callous, but you are the cold and callous ones. You'll be there to make sure the baby is born, but then when the child asks for food, it's someone else's problem. When these children grow up dazed and confused from a less than half a meager childhood, don't question why they might steal from you or squat on your land. Continue denying the fact that children who grow up this way have little chance if any of anyone actually loving them...in the right way, then you ignore the very problem you create for the sake of ideology. Is it better to die in the womb or a slow painful death, fully conscious of your plight day after day wondering, "Is there really a God?" MUHAAAAA!!! Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:29:50 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23780750 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23749500 already expensive. There is already intense fighting about it in Congress right now and across the country. Can you really imagine? 600,000 MORE people being born in our country EVERYyear. And then every 20 years from each of those years, you compound the figures. Those are staggering numbers of people in our population. America would quickly become as densely populated as India and other third world countries. Those unloved children would set up shanty towns outside of your homes and churches begging for food. What meager social services we have would be diminished to nothing. You are begging for your own demise and the demise of the rest of us from an ideological point of view. Praise God, Yay! But God is not as clean and neat about taking life as George Tiller was. I hear the guy responsible for the Norwegian church burnings is out of jail. Perhaps the US should send him a Visa? Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:46:04 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23749500 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23749481 the child and the community would be better served without having to support a baby that is NOT going to have all of the love and attention that a child needs. Ignorance is bliss. Life on earth without love is HELL. They have decided that they cannot suport a child and they have made the decision that the community should not have to support this child either. It seems that most of you view an unplanned pregnancy as a punishment for fooling around or being promiscuous. "That's what they get for not being responsible." I'm so glad you view children in that way. Someone said Tiller killed 600,000 babies a year. Maybe. But are YOU willing to support those 600,000 babies if they were born? How would we feed them? Are you willing to feed them? ALL OF THEM? Healthcare is Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:45:42 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23749481 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23749354 Christian Taliban is RIGHT! Remember! The Taliban only represents a small radical portion of the Middle East philosophy. Not all Middle Easterners believe as the Taliban. Sadly, the people who find Tiller's passing a blessing are the very ones who would eventually kill us all. A moralistic point of view is nice, but a pragmatic view point should take precedent. Tiller performed a valuable service. He wasn't killing babies. He was SAVING them from a world of misery and suffering that would only beget them should they have been born. What the moralists don't understand is that the people making these decisions have already thought long long long long and hard about this decision. They have beat themselves up over it. And frankly, they don't need you to help. They have come to the conclusion that they themselves, Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:43:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98N94SG0#IDComment23749354 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96VTRDG0#IDComment17147907 I'm sorry, but you people that sit there and say this bailout thing is Obama's fault are just idiots. How is Obama responsible for a contracts that were signed in 2007 and 2008 by George W. Bush. Stop trying to blame the black man for the white man's problems! Obama is at least out there trying to get the money back. George Bush would have said, "Well, we'll look into any alleged abuses." And that would be the end of the story. So shut up about Obama causing this financial crisis! This happened long before him and he is trying to fix a bad situation. Your lame rhetoric exposes how ignorant you are helps nothing! "It's "H's" fault." Yeah....George W. "H." Bush! Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:58:40 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96VTRDG0#IDComment17147907