<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/635905</link>
		<description>Comments by GrumpyOldGuy</description>
<item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Boat auction helps Lake Delhi</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/09/12/boat-auction-helps-lake-delhi#IDComment98457268</link>
<description>If the dam owners can&amp;#039;t find anything to do, as the vice-president of the ski team says, then they aren&amp;#039;t looking very hard. There are plenty of property owners, both upstream and down, who suffered property damage because of the dam who most likely would appreciate some help cleaning up the mess that was left on their property because of the dam. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/09/12/boat-auction-helps-lake-delhi#IDComment98457268</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Lake Delhi dam officials unveil $9.9 million plan to rebuild by next summer</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/2010/09/10/lake-delhi-dam-officials-unveil-9-9-million-plan-to-rebuild-by-next-summer#IDComment98161055</link>
<description>It seems kind of funny he article doesn&amp;#039;t mention how the dam owners plan on coming up with the money to compensate property owners both up and down stream for the property damage they suffered because of the dam the association owns and is responsible for. Imo, that should be the dam owners first priority, instead of just thinking of themselves and re-creating their private playground. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 06:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/2010/09/10/lake-delhi-dam-officials-unveil-9-9-million-plan-to-rebuild-by-next-summer#IDComment98161055</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : UI officials clarify after-game tailgating rule</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/08/19/ui-officials-clarify-after-game-tailgating-rule#IDComment94454887</link>
<description>I think law enforcement owes the public an explanation as to why these &amp;quot;tailgaters&amp;quot; are allowed to climb behind the wheel and drive home afrer spending a good portion of the day, before, during and after the game consuming alcohol. Is Iowa football so important to state coffers that these people are allowed to be an exception to the law and put the rest of the motoring public at risk of being maimed or killed? In my opinion, law enforcement should be posted at every exit of the U of I parking lots and ramps and sticking a breathalizer into the mouth of each and every driver, one by one, as they leave U of I property and enter the public roadways. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/08/19/ui-officials-clarify-after-game-tailgating-rule#IDComment94454887</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Iowa City still says no to tailgating site</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/government/2010/08/16/iowa-city-still-says-no-to-tailgating-site#IDComment93587870</link>
<description>Hooray for the council holding their ground. Now, if law enforcement would start doing IT&amp;#039;S job and start sticking breathalizers in the mouths of drivers leaving the parking lots, maybe Iowa football Saturdays would go back to being about football instead of an excuse to have a big public drunk. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/government/2010/08/16/iowa-city-still-says-no-to-tailgating-site#IDComment93587870</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Council to hold public hearing on Second Avenue closure</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/government/2010/08/09/council-to-hold-public-hearing-on-second-avenue-closure#IDComment91856209</link>
<description>How about elevating the portion of the building that would set on 2nd ave one story and leave 2nd ave. open? Better yet, why not elevate the entire building one story, leave 2nd ave. open and use the ground floor level on both sides of 2nd ave. for parking instead of building an $8 million parking ramp? Either of these solutions should make everybody happy. One other solution would be to run 2nd ave. UNDER the building. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/government/2010/08/09/council-to-hold-public-hearing-on-second-avenue-closure#IDComment91856209</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Many downstream residents hope Delhi dam isn&#039;t rebuilt</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/08/05/many-downstream-residents-hope-delhi-dam-isnt-rebuilt#IDComment91097684</link>
<description>It seems to me the association should be liable for all the property damage done downstream as a result of the dam failure. Also, I can&amp;#039;t help but think that dam holding the water back also makes flood damage upstream more severe. If that river had been free flowing, surely the flooding would have been less severe in downtown Manchester, along with all the private homes in Manchester that were damaged. If the association wants to enjoy the benefits of having their own private dam then it seems to me they should be willing to accept all the responsibilitys and liabilitys that go with it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 00:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/08/05/many-downstream-residents-hope-delhi-dam-isnt-rebuilt#IDComment91097684</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Plan to reduce dust gets negative reviews</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/public-safety/2010/08/04/plan-to-reduce-dust-gets-negative-reviews#IDComment90924630</link>
<description>How many illegal aliens do you suppose it would take to harvest Iowa&amp;#039;s crops by hand? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2010 04:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/public-safety/2010/08/04/plan-to-reduce-dust-gets-negative-reviews#IDComment90924630</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Lake Delhi dam will be rebuilt, association president vows</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/08/04/lake-delhi-dam-will-be-rebuilt-association-president-vows#IDComment90797859</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Attempt&amp;quot; to get re-elected is all Culver will do.  Branstad will blow him away. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/08/04/lake-delhi-dam-will-be-rebuilt-association-president-vows#IDComment90797859</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Culver wants plan for Lake Delhi recovery, possible dam rebuilding</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/08/03/culver-wants-plan-for-lake-delhi-recovery-possible-dam-rebuilding#IDComment90666629</link>
<description>Imo. Culver is making a big mistake. That dam is privately owned and no way should the taxpayers be on the hook for repairing or replacing it. The people that own it knew or should have known there was always a possibility of failure when they bought the dam and if they didn&amp;#039;t insure it against failure and any resulting property damage caused by a failure, then they have no one to blame but themselves. Either have the people who own it come up with the funds to repair/replace it or let the DNR remove what&amp;#039;s left and bill that cost to the owners also. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 21:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/statewide-news/2010/08/03/culver-wants-plan-for-lake-delhi-recovery-possible-dam-rebuilding#IDComment90666629</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Hefty reminder of Sinclair plant now at The History Center</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/07/22/hefty-reminder-of-sinclair-plant-now-at-the-history-center#IDComment88193254</link>
<description>I have a suggestion for the Preservation Commission on where to direct the FEMA money. Since it isn&amp;#039;t going to be used on the smokestack, as intended, how about returning it to the U.S. Treasury? It would help pay for the $30 plus billion we just had to borrow to extend unemployment benefits. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/07/22/hefty-reminder-of-sinclair-plant-now-at-the-history-center#IDComment88193254</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : State-of-the-art landfill expansion struts its science as well as trash</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/government/2010/07/16/state-of-the-art-landfill-expansion-struts-its-science-as-well-as-trash#IDComment86910683</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not against the landfill but can&amp;#039;t imagine anyone wanting to use a trail or fishing pond at a landfill site unless they have no sense of smell. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 06:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/government/2010/07/16/state-of-the-art-landfill-expansion-struts-its-science-as-well-as-trash#IDComment86910683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : City to direct FEMA funds to fix electrical service in Ellis Boat Harbor</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/07/13/city-to-direct-fema-funds-to-fix-electrical-service-in-ellis-boat-harbor#IDComment86554992</link>
<description>If the public is going to fund making electrical service available for the fortunate few who own boathouses at Ellis Harbor, will these boathouses then be available for public use or will the owners be the only ones to benefit? Something just doesn&amp;#039;t sit quite right with the idea of the public footing the cost to make electricity available to privately owned boathouses. If I remember right, after the 2008 flood, the DNR said or ruled these boathouses never should have been allowed to be on the river in the first place and a special variance had to be granted for them to remain. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/07/13/city-to-direct-fema-funds-to-fix-electrical-service-in-ellis-boat-harbor#IDComment86554992</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Sinclair smokestack to be razed in phases</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/07/12/sinclair-smokestack-to-be-razed-in-phases#IDComment86363020</link>
<description>$97,000 for a crane? More wasted money. All it would take is a small charge of dynamite at the base to topple the whole thing over and to heck with the &amp;quot;plinth&amp;quot;  Wait and see how much money they manage to waste preserving and or restoring this &amp;quot;plinth&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/07/12/sinclair-smokestack-to-be-razed-in-phases#IDComment86363020</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Linn County hopes to sell downtown Witwer Building by year&#039;s end</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/government/2010/07/10/linn-county-hopes-to-sell-downtown-witwer-building-by-years-end-2#IDComment86108935</link>
<description>How is it possible for a building worth $450,000 to sustain $1.2 million in damage? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 12:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/government/2010/07/10/linn-county-hopes-to-sell-downtown-witwer-building-by-years-end-2#IDComment86108935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : City commission hopes smokestack base can be saved</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/06/24/city-commission-hopes-smokestack-base-can-be-saved#IDComment82026779</link>
<description>Preserving the &amp;quot;plinth&amp;quot; it&amp;#039;s called, will accomplish 3 things. 1. It will make taking the rest of it down more complicated so the &amp;quot;plinth&amp;quot; isn&amp;#039;t damaged. 2. It will make the job take longer. and 3. It will make the job more expensive. This historic preservation commission seems determined, come hell or high water, to waste tax dollars on this old chimney, one way or another. Do any of these people know our national debt has now exceeded $13 TRILLION and is still climbing? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/06/24/city-commission-hopes-smokestack-base-can-be-saved#IDComment82026779</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Paramount renovation committee in hunt for more funds </title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/flood-recovery/2010/06/23/paramount-renovation-committee-in-hunt-for-more-funds#IDComment81840323</link>
<description>I know everyone would like to see the downtown restored as soon as possible but isn&amp;#039;t it making anyone atleast a little nervous that all these millions are being spent on restoration when no flood control is yet in place and likely won&amp;#039;t be for years to come?...Meanwhile, the river is running bank full and the forcast is for more heavy rain later this week. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 03:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/flood-recovery/2010/06/23/paramount-renovation-committee-in-hunt-for-more-funds#IDComment81840323</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Linn County to require union, non-union worker match</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/06/21/linn-county-to-require-union-non-union-worker-match#IDComment81353051</link>
<description>Where did the idea originate that tradesmen who join a union suddenly become skilled tradesmen and tradesmen who remain non-union do not? That&amp;#039;s one of the silliest things I&amp;#039;ve ever heard of and in my opinion, is nothing but union propaganda. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/06/21/linn-county-to-require-union-non-union-worker-match#IDComment81353051</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Linn County to require union, non-union worker match</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/06/21/linn-county-to-require-union-non-union-worker-match#IDComment81270610</link>
<description>I thought, according to state law, that government officials are required to accept the lowest bid by a qualifying contractor. If it isn&amp;#039;t a law, it should be. I don&amp;#039;t see how elected officials can justify subjecting taxpayers to paying a higher price for union labor when it isn&amp;#039;t necessary. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/government/2010/06/21/linn-county-to-require-union-non-union-worker-match#IDComment81270610</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Linn County mulls higher fees for open burners, pollution sources</title>
<link>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/2010/06/16/linn-county-mulls-higher-fees-for-open-burners-pollution-sources#IDComment80531151</link>
<description>Why are people being charged for installing air pollution equipment? Shouldn&amp;#039;t they be rewarded instead? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 05:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://oldgo.gazlab.com.php5-15.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/local-news/2010/06/16/linn-county-mulls-higher-fees-for-open-burners-pollution-sources#IDComment80531151</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Part of historic West Branch building collapses</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/public-safety/2010/06/11/part-of-historic-west-branch-building-collapses#IDComment79682062</link>
<description>Why couldn&amp;#039;t it have been the Sinclair smokestack before any public money is wasted on it? Sometimes, there is just no justice in this world. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/local-news/public-safety/2010/06/11/part-of-historic-west-branch-building-collapses#IDComment79682062</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>