<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1479821</link>
		<description>Comments by GOP_TEA</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Sherrod Plans to Sue Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/29/sherrod-plans-to-sue-breitbart/#IDComment89705865</link>
<description>Thank you.  No ... of course not.  &amp;#039;Nuff said. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/29/sherrod-plans-to-sue-breitbart/#IDComment89705865</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Senate Candidate:  Tea Partiers Questioning Obama&#039;s Citizenship &#039;Dumbasses&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/senate-candidate-tea-partiers-questioning-obamas-citizenship-dumbasses/#IDComment89596759</link>
<description>Please apologize.  Don&amp;#039;t alienate the Teabaggers Ken Buck.  They are the best thing to happen for conservatives and the GOP in the last ten years.  I can&amp;#039;t think of a better way to divide the GOP - split the vote between Republican and Tea Party candidates.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/senate-candidate-tea-partiers-questioning-obamas-citizenship-dumbasses/#IDComment89596759</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Sherrod Plans to Sue Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/29/sherrod-plans-to-sue-breitbart/#IDComment89594798</link>
<description>Think I am out of the loop.  Can you post the link where the NAACP is identified as the provider of the excerpt? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/29/sherrod-plans-to-sue-breitbart/#IDComment89594798</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Sherrod Plans to Sue Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/29/sherrod-plans-to-sue-breitbart/#IDComment89594603</link>
<description>&amp;#039;You say this whole thing is setup from the start to distract us from the real goings on&amp;#039; - The video was posted by Breitbart.  Are you truly saying then that Breitbart is trying to distract the people who follow his postings?  &amp;#039;Getting back at the conservative is all that matters, facts and logic aside.&amp;#039; - Breibart inserted racism on Sherrod&amp;#039;s part by posting an excerpt from a video clip.  Question - Is his action the impetus for all of this dialogue on the Sherrod incident?    This is clear, she is accusing tea partiers, Republicans and conservatives who oppose Obama racist - You are taking some huge leaps in logic here.  You say that you watched the whole video, correct?  Could you please give me the time stamps when she identifies - tea-baggers, Republicans and conservatives?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/29/sherrod-plans-to-sue-breitbart/#IDComment89594603</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Sherrod Plans to Sue Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/29/sherrod-plans-to-sue-breitbart/#IDComment89593324</link>
<description>Sorry for you here.   It seems that &amp;#039;Intense Debate&amp;#039; is nothing but a forum for people to yell and scream and change the topic.  The topic here is Sherrod suing Breitbart.  Somehow Missy has turned this into a debate over fascism.  And she apparently doesn&amp;#039;t understand your answer.  Maybe spell it out for her ver slowly.  Let her digest.  I believe you were trying to tell her  ....... N .....o .....  Of course state run media is not ok.  She is actually trying to compare our media to N.Korea and if that&amp;#039;s ok. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/29/sherrod-plans-to-sue-breitbart/#IDComment89593324</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Rats Infest NYC Park</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/rats-infest-nyc-park/#IDComment89589752</link>
<description>TOO FUNNY.  I so thought that was the GOP convention.  All those little rats running around looked like Republicans scrambling to snatch up whatever little morsels they could find.  Did you see the John McCain rat running around looking for someone to tell him what to do or say next? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/rats-infest-nyc-park/#IDComment89589752</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88843202</link>
<description>I will admit that Ann did a superb judge of not debating the Sherrod matter.  She had plenty to say about a lot of other subjects that had nothing to do with what she agreed to debate about.  She actually won the argument and controlled the debate and said nothing little to nothing about the actual topic presented.  I am quite impressed. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88843202</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88842816</link>
<description>First-I compared the work the day laborers and immigrants do to servitude. Servitude- the state of being a slave or completely subject to someone more powerful.  Hmmmm ... not a slave but pretty damn close. Second-there was never a mention of &amp;#039;lowering&amp;#039; myself.  I admit fully that I could not do that back-breaking work.  Have you ever done 8 hours in the field?  Bent over the whole time.  For pennies? Third-yes, they are leaving their home countries of their own accord.  They are trying to make better lives for their families.  You are wrong when you say that no one is treating them badly.  Racism and the fact that Arizona has instituted a law that specifically is designed to allow police to stereotype Latinos is, in my mind, treating people badly.  I believe that everyone should be judged on their individual merits.  Not the stereotyping of their culture. Fourth-There isn&amp;#039;t much that I am politically correct about.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88842816</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88812200</link>
<description>I, actually, do have my own little garden growing on my porch.  Nothing huge but its all organic and no seeds from Monsanto.  I don&amp;#039;t think I explained myself correctly.  I could never lower myself to go out and work my are off in the fields for 8 to 10 hours a day for pennies for people who were so thankless and had such a sense of self-propriety that they have no appreciation for me at all.  Funny - we abolished slavery but apparently most of our country has no problem with servitude. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88812200</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88630674</link>
<description>Nope.  I&amp;#039;m not gone be the one.  I admit my shortcomings.  I could never do that job.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88630674</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88551720</link>
<description>Thank you.  It is hard for me to believe that the people positing on this site believe there was an actual debate.  Ann does do an incredible job of controlling the discussion and is incredibly evasive.  Liberals need some hotties to stand up and start talking for them.  GOP/Tea Party have the milf - Palin and the cougar - Coulter.  Shame to think it is actually coming down to such base tactics. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88551720</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88551322</link>
<description>Debate-a formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.  I would love to see Ann stick to facts.  Discussing kiddie porn - really?  Kinda crass, don&amp;#039;t you think?  Ann should have been able to come up with something better.  Undeserving of discussion between intellectuals. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88551322</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88550961</link>
<description>Ignorance-lack of knowledge or information.  plain-simple or ordinary in character.  I&amp;#039;m sorry did you want me to analyze the debate a little better.  Let me try again just for you - There was no debate. Debate-a formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.  I did not hear Ann actually present an opposing argument.  She did a great job of not answering any question and did a great job of presenting herself as biased and opinionated.  I&amp;#039;m impressed. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88550961</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88550103</link>
<description>Well Hoss, you are living in Arizona.  Let me guess - you&amp;#039;re gonna be the one to go out and work in the fields after you catch all the illegal immigrants who have been taking jobs from you? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88550103</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88549569</link>
<description>Was there actually a debate here?  Ann did a great job of controlling the conversation.  At what point was there an actual honest debate?  Can u people actually tell me that you believe this is how issues should be debated? By not talking about the issue being debated and changing topic whenever pushed to answer the question?   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88549569</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :     Coulter: Media Make Sherrod a Saint But Still Smear Tea Party</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88545587</link>
<description>to-OPTEKnerd  How can you even think that there was a debate over the issue?  Ann never actually said anything.  She did a great job of changing the debate and not owning up to her views.  It&amp;#039;s incredible how people can not accept responsibility for their actions and what they say.  Or is this the new agenda for the Conservatives - throw more slander and propaganda on top of the original statement so they never actually have to debate an issue?  Stop looking at Ann&amp;#039;s ta-tas and listen to what&amp;#039;s coming out of her mouth.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-media-makes-sherrod-a-saint-but-still-smears-tea-party/#IDComment88545587</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>