<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/656269</link>
		<description>Comments by GOONKA</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Martin Luther King’s Family Halts Occupy Event at Atlanta Memorial Center </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jsshapiro/2012/01/30/martin-luther-kings-family-halts-occupy-event-at-atlanta-memorial-center/#IDComment279339671</link>
<description>What is difficult to grasp about the article?  It would appear that many wish to construe something from nothing.  OWS was attempting to hold a news conference on PRIVATE property.  In addition to that, they did NOT have a permit (surprised!) and were told this, in addition, to WHY the family said they would not be allowed to use the Center for a press conference.    MLK was NOT a violent man, and he would not condone what the OWS is about, as they are NOT about true social change for GOOD, but pushing &amp;#039;their&amp;#039; agenda.  They are anti capitalism, they ARE about a free ride.  The US Park service was simply asked to &amp;#039;relay the message&amp;#039; they were not being allowed to hold a press conference on private property, hoping that it got the point across quickly, and loudly:  you will NOT use MKL&amp;#039;s name for your purposes.     The King family has a very important image to protect, and not surprisingly, they do not want OWS or others, to defile what MLK did for all of America.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jsshapiro/2012/01/30/martin-luther-kings-family-halts-occupy-event-at-atlanta-memorial-center/#IDComment279339671</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Media Mum on Big Business, SEIU Profiting From Workers’ Bill</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/sswift/2011/09/12/media-mum-on-big-business-seiu-profiting-from-workers-bill/#IDComment192572267</link>
<description>POINT REMAINS: you said this does NOT cover babysitters, and yes.  It quite clearly does.  And it goes back to the basis for this story: this IS going to hurt all:  parents, the normal caretakers, etc.     And someone that comes into my home to care for my children, intends to file for workmans compensation because they cut their say finger on a can opener?  well that is going to cause another issue, now won&amp;#039;t it?  In fact, the reports of children being left home alone will probably start going up as well.    Way to go California.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/sswift/2011/09/12/media-mum-on-big-business-seiu-profiting-from-workers-bill/#IDComment192572267</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Media Mum on Big Business, SEIU Profiting From Workers’ Bill</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/sswift/2011/09/12/media-mum-on-big-business-seiu-profiting-from-workers-bill/#IDComment192563682</link>
<description> (b) California&amp;#039;s domestic workers, which includes housekeepers, nannies, and caregivers for children, persons with disabilities, and the elderly, work in private households to care for the health, safety, and well-being of the most important aspects of Californians&amp;#039; lives: their families and homes.     Yes, it does include babysitters, caregivers for children is pretty specific.  If you pay someone for a service they do in the above definition, IN your home, that makes them YOUR employee. AND it also makes clear that it does not matter how many hours they work, you - as the &amp;#039;employer&amp;#039; MUST total ALL hours paid and pay in ALL taxes, workmans comp insurance, etc  otherwise it is a misdemeanor.       The only allowance is for those under 18 years of age and grandparents, etc  - THAT said, IF the person who is doing the sitting, gets injured, etc while IN the home, ON the job, they will have a right to file a complaint.        </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/sswift/2011/09/12/media-mum-on-big-business-seiu-profiting-from-workers-bill/#IDComment192563682</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer Shreds Obama&#039;s &#039;Campaign&#039; Speech</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-shreds-obamas-campaign-speech/#IDComment177846158</link>
<description>as an independent: I know a lie when I see it, and I disagree with anyone who thinks independents are THAT stupid to think &amp;#039;balanced approach&amp;#039; is anything less than:  I&amp;#039;m going to spend more of YOUR $ and tell you it&amp;#039;s good for you.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-shreds-obamas-campaign-speech/#IDComment177846158</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Wisconsin Unions Only Have Themselves to Blame </title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/03/11/wisconsin-unions-only-have-themselves-to-blame/#IDComment134641411</link>
<description>I am in Wisconsin - we elected him.  Union did NOT concede.  (D) senators cut and ran - they REFUSED to come to the table - don&amp;#039;t even try to tell a different story.  The facts are there for all to see.    Collective bargaining is NOT a right.  Because some union - left leaning legislature made it a law HOW many years ago, does NOT make it a right.   They did so because the union said:  we&amp;#039;ll keep you guys in office IF you make sure we get union dues.     And for all that which the unions keep touting as facts - it&amp;#039;s garbage.  Wisconsin laws are FAR better than most in regards to employees (except that we are NOT a right to work state, and we should be - the only one that opposes that is the union.  WHY is that ..) so quit your whining.   The majority spoke.  Stop listening to what they tell you to believe. Stand up, thinkk for yourself.  Just because we aren&amp;#039;t in the street screaming and making up signs that degrade ourselves as rational thinking human beings, doesnt mean we don&amp;#039;t stand behind our governor.  Because we do.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2011/03/11/wisconsin-unions-only-have-themselves-to-blame/#IDComment134641411</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wisconsin Unions Threaten Businesses</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/11/wisconsin-unions-threaten-businesses/#IDComment134384644</link>
<description>Don&amp;#039;t forget how they are bullying local businesses to put up the communist fist in their business windows so that the UNIONS know WHO stands with them.   It is crap.  We know it.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/11/wisconsin-unions-threaten-businesses/#IDComment134384644</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wisconsin Unions Threaten Businesses</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/11/wisconsin-unions-threaten-businesses/#IDComment134384402</link>
<description>Greta knows whats coming and why she said:  it&amp;#039;s not over yet.   The State Security has to &amp;#039;publish&amp;#039; the law for it to be in affect.  Walker said to do it on Monday.  The Security (Doug LaFollette - D) said that he is &amp;#039;waiting&amp;#039; 10 days.   We know WHY he is.  There are many school districts and unions rushing to redo contracts that are expiring end of June and he knows that several lawsuits have been filed, so he claims that it would be best if they wait the full 10 days, thats what he &amp;#039;always does&amp;#039;.     Until its published: it is not law.  They tried to get an injunction today on it: didn&amp;#039;t happen.  We have a HUGE April 5 vote :  Supreme Court as well as MKE County Exec   -  she is correct.  This is not over yet.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 07:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/11/wisconsin-unions-threaten-businesses/#IDComment134384402</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wisconsin Unions Threaten Businesses</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/11/wisconsin-unions-threaten-businesses/#IDComment134370658</link>
<description>We know that they have sent out letters to all (Kwik Trip has released their letter as well) listed as contributors to than Milwaukee County Exec Scott Walker campaign for Governor  I would ask that ALL that see this, spread it - and make sure to google for anything relating to boycotting Walker and our (R) senators and SUPPORT those businesses.  Union thuggery at work here.  They need to know that the &amp;#039;common&amp;#039; folk (since we are apparently not good enough to be one of them and labeled middle class) DO read and we DONT like bullying.  And Obama has his thugs running the recalls for our (R) senators because you know that&amp;#039;s how they roll in Chicago politics.    Below is an email that Madison WI  FF Local 311 sent to its members to explore starting a committee to cause more issues for those that don&amp;#039;t &amp;#039;think&amp;#039; like them, including ramifications of striking.  Clearly this violates the law as it stands in Wisconsin, but more importantly, it proves that FF&amp;#039;s that do this, as well as the officers in Madison (State Troopers were called into the Capitol to take care of the issues there since Madison cops refused to do their jobs - they are union after all, sending another message of WHY there should not be a public sector union.. but I digress)  - do not care about human life, preferring to listen to the almighty union and scream for their rights.  Never mind that the rest of Wisconsin has rights.      (listed above in the letter to M&amp;amp;I is the president of this same group - Jim Conway)  Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:42 PM  To: FD GROUP  Subject: PRIVALEDGED UNION COMMUNICATIONS  Local 311 members,   Local 311 is looking for members to serve on three different Committees.  The Committees are listed below.  If you are interested in serving on any of the Committees, please e-mail (deleted) as soon as possible.  We would like to schedule meeting dates starting  possibly as soon as next week.  Along with the participation on these commitees we would like all members to be ready and hopefully willing to assist these committees in helping them with the actions and assistance that may be needed in the near future.    Thank you.   Recall Elections Committee - This Committee will explore the logistics and assist others with the planning and infrastructure of running Recall Elections for certain Legislators, and to assist &amp;quot;labor friendly&amp;quot; legislators that are facing possible Recall Elections.   Job Actions Committee &amp;ndash; Discuss and assemble a list of possible job actions. Also discuss the possible impact of such actions or that of a general strike.   Boycott Committee - This Committee would discuss sending questionnaires or calling on contributors to Walker&amp;#039;s campaign asking whether they still support Walker&amp;#039;s anti-labor agenda or whether they no longer support his over-stepping agenda. Compile a list of businesses who are Walker supporters that we, and other Unions, can use to boycott, and compile a list of &amp;quot;labor friendly&amp;quot; businesses.   Sincerely,   Local 311 sec./tres. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 05:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/03/11/wisconsin-unions-threaten-businesses/#IDComment134370658</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Leaked Email: Screen Actors Guild Asks Members to Join Anti-Walker Protests in Wisconsin</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/02/22/leaked-email-screen-actors-guild-asks-members-to-join-pro-union-protests-in-wisconsin/#IDComment130014404</link>
<description>The state did not have a budget surplus, as a matter of fact.  Not sure which one of the MSM you got that from, but while it makes for good union &amp;#039;talking points&amp;#039; it is, factually incorrect.   As of budget year closing June 2009, Wisconsin (under Doyle) was already 2.71 BILLION in the deficit and an article from a VERY left leaning Madison paper reported THAT fact in January 2010 - a FULL year before Walker took office.  And the before mentioned deficit had gone up by 8.4% from the PREVIOUS year (see .. doesn&amp;#039;t DO the union any good to talk about how Walker is in this to break the unions UNLESS they lie and say there was a surplus hence &amp;#039;ooo Walker is creating a fake crisis to break us!)  - SO WHY Walker is saying he is trying to avoid being at 3.6 BILLION deficit at the end of THIS budget year which ends in June 2011.      A simple google will help you find the article as well as the actual government docs online.  I LIVE there, I KNOW.     NOW in regards to another comment you made, the people &amp;#039;protesting&amp;#039; ?  buses in.  The majority are NOT from Madison or even from Wisconsin.  There are websites galore where you can look for the pictures of the license plates, as well as what was on the sides of the buses.   And as far as the FUGITIVE 14 - they know that the unions pay HEAVILY into their election coffers.  So we KNOW why they left.     But since you are interested, while you are googling the before mentioned information, also look up how the lame duck session RAMMED through some more union concessions, knowing that Walker WAS coming into office and they KNEW the reality of it, but wanted to get that done sneakily.     Collective bargaining rights is another union mantra - I know, I used to spew it.  And in order for Walker to effectively get a grip on OUR state issues (and quite honestly, I could care less if he layed off 10k - they SHOULD be going to their unions for refunds - that MONEY paid in SHOULD be there for TIME JUST LIKE THIS (and another reason why I despise unions, it&amp;#039;s a money racket to them, and I&amp;#039;ve said this a million times at least:  they SHOULD be forced to put that money INTO interest bearing accounts in the off chance, say: a state needs to find ways to make ends meet and needs to cut public spending including public employees wages, or other benefits.  THAT money should be there - like an insurance.  And honestly, I think if people wised up, they would see that the money is the ONLY reason the unions are in upheaval: they see their cash cows potentially drying up)  - he needs to be able to CHANGE the contracts, but collective bargaining MUST be dropped before he can legally do that.  It is a legal thing.  AND the collective bargaining needs to be dropped before SMALLER towns, etc can balance THEIR budgets.  Get it?  I am NOT willing to pay for (nor could I afford it, so MORE people will walk from homes and the cycle will continue) if my city raises taxes again.  We pay our teachers quite a lot and I was just informed via the school board that 20% of the teachers DID NO SHOW / call in sick  - that list of bogus MD&amp;#039;s will be used to go over them and unfortunately, we will be going through the MD&amp;#039;s records - as allowed by law - to see if they were actually SEEN or if the MD is after the fact &amp;#039;covering their asses&amp;#039; - its a violation.    BUT another part of collective bargaining:  we will have to pay them their sick pay DUE TO IT.  HOW fair is that to stick to the tax payers?  It truly is not.     And you - and others - do not need to take my word for anything.  I just suggest NOT following many MSM news orators for your vital need to know information gathering.  Its dangerous and puts you at risk in the long end, because one day you will see whats happening and say: but they said so!      and as a bonus note:  Maddow was PROVEN FALSE in her on air claim that Wisconsin was operating in a surplus, just goes to show: careful where you get your talking points from AND your news.  Yes, google that too.     and this is the guy that had to clean up Milwaukee after our last mayor as well (2002 - HUGE pension scandal, he made tough choices than, and got the city back towards hobbling along)  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/02/22/leaked-email-screen-actors-guild-asks-members-to-join-pro-union-protests-in-wisconsin/#IDComment130014404</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Union Superpowers! (Featuring &#039;Wisconsin Vern&#039;)</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/scrowder/2011/02/22/union-superpowers-featuring-wisconsin-vern/#IDComment129884089</link>
<description>I would MUCH rather the RICH company have money since it means: I HAVE A JOB.  When the PLANT closes, the union slithers away and I don&amp;#039;t get a refund on ALL those thousands of dollars in MANDATORY union dues paid in.    BUT that&amp;#039;s just my take as a former Delphi employee whose job went to Mexico due to the HIGH LEGACY COSTS - never mind that the BO slashed the pensions but ALLOWED the UAW workers to keep their pensions.     yeah.  Pretty much unions suck ya til your dried out, than move onto new victims.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/scrowder/2011/02/22/union-superpowers-featuring-wisconsin-vern/#IDComment129884089</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Wisc State Senator to MSNBC&#039;s Matthews: &#039;You&#039;re Completely Misinformed&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/wisc-state-senator-to-msnbcs-matthews-youre-completely-misinformed/#IDComment129775400</link>
<description>HEY MEATHEAD:  4 unions out of 314 unions in the state of Wisconsins FF and PD&amp;#039;s supported him AND that is because those 4 unions already dealt with Barrett, knew him to be a HORRIBLE liar and took their chance with Walker - so the majority of the states emergency unions - that is 310 of them (to help you with the math) that did NOT back Walker - so yes, Meathead, you ARE wildly uninformed.  If I didnt know better, I&amp;#039;d think you were getting your facts from Madcow.       </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/wisc-state-senator-to-msnbcs-matthews-youre-completely-misinformed/#IDComment129775400</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : &#039;Don&#039;t Ask, Don&#039;t Tell&#039; Repeal: Congress Ignores Combat Troops</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/edonnelly/2010/12/19/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-congress-ignores-combat-troops/#IDComment117004627</link>
<description>You have spoken VOLUMES with just the few words you chose.  And I too have wondered about the forthcoming lawsuits alledging &amp;#039;sexual preference discrimination&amp;#039;  - we know what is going to happen.  This is the military boys n girls - you dont want to be, DON&amp;#039;T enlist.    But I have to wonder if this is NOT what BO had planned from the onset.. he was steadfast in the belief that ALL should serve time in the military (note: he has NEVER of course) and I bet you the number drop and he will MANDATE a draft OR they will draft a ram of a &amp;#039;you must serve&amp;#039; but I suspect that the white folks will be the first to be forced.. AND those that are muslim of course, will NOT have to.    I find this whole situation a lost cause .. for many.  And using these two examples as given above in the article ..   ( # Punishments for &amp;ldquo;resistance;&amp;rdquo; i.e., zero tolerance of anyone who disagrees for any reason, including &amp;ldquo;moral or religious beliefs.&amp;rdquo; (pp. 50-51)  Senate testimony confirmed that an undetermined number of chaplains having moral conflicts with LGBT policies would be lost to the service. The report concedes that on the issue of religious freedom for chaplains, &amp;ldquo;boundaries are not always clearly defined.&amp;rdquo; (p. 16 and p. 80)  Litigation is guaranteed, but Congress has surrendered decision-making power to unelected bureaucrats or federal courts. # Repeal of certain personal conduct provisions in the UCMJ, eliminating or lowering some standards to accommodate consensual homosexual conduct.  (p. 18)  Congress has just voted to repeal statutory findings that rules of conduct apply both on- and off-base.)   ..  one has to wonder what happens to those that are considered &amp;#039;straight&amp;#039; - they just lost THEIR rights to have THEIR own opinion, much less THEIR rights to not want something or someone in their life,  for the sake of someone else who is gay?  it is NOT right.   And I see many lawsuits arising out of both men and women being on the receiving end of false - and sadly, true - accusations of either being accosted OR accosting someone who is NOT interested.    And I disagree with the words of &amp;#039;they chose this life style&amp;#039;  - some may &amp;#039;choose&amp;#039; to be gay because they see it as kitchy (yes.. many young teen age girls are saying they are gay now ..  whatever..  if they are over 18, no one has a right to say WHOM they have interactions with so long as the other participant is also over 18) or the &amp;#039;in thing&amp;#039; - but the majority of those that prefer same sex relations are NOT choosing it, it IS how they feel &amp;#039;inside&amp;#039;  - just as a straight person is attracted to the opposite sex.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/edonnelly/2010/12/19/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-congress-ignores-combat-troops/#IDComment117004627</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Free Wesley! Hollywood Defends Terrorists, Dictators, Child Rapists &amp; Cop Killers ... But Tax Cheats</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2010/12/16/free-wesley-hollywood-defends-terrorists-dictators-child-rapists-cop-killers-but-tax-cheats-go-too-far/#IDComment116231107</link>
<description>.. as one who has worked with Mr Snipes, no, he is NOT a butthead to work with.  He is very hard working, but he believes in working hard and playing hard.  AND what he makes is HIS.    On that note, this is ALL about setting a prescendant for any other H&amp;#039;wood type that may want to push the enveloped and say: hmm.. yanno.. I dont think you have a right to keep MY $$ either.   Unless your a dem, and a dem who works in the WH under the POTUS.  Than you can do whatever you want.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2010/12/16/free-wesley-hollywood-defends-terrorists-dictators-child-rapists-cop-killers-but-tax-cheats-go-too-far/#IDComment116231107</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama Signals to MoveOn: Full Speed Ahead on Liberal Agenda</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-signals-to-moveon-full-speed-ahead-on-liberal-agenda/#IDComment107998998</link>
<description>guess I am late to the party, the video is being tagged as no longer able to be viewed - someone serve them with a slap of shut up obama style? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-signals-to-moveon-full-speed-ahead-on-liberal-agenda/#IDComment107998998</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Should We Blame Obama, Rangel, and Baucus if People Die to Escape the Death Tax?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/dmitchell/2010/10/31/should-we-blame-obama-rangel-and-baucus-if-people-die-to-escape-the-death-tax/#IDComment107177390</link>
<description>AND the final analysis is still that ANY money received through an estate has already been taxed and taxed ENOUGH.  There should be NO death tax and the gov&amp;#039;t should NEVER benefit by any citizens passing.  That money is meant to go to the survivors and quite honestly, it should be a NON reporting incident.   I am a FIRM believer in it&amp;#039;s MINE.  Not your.  Nor yours.  And most definitely NOT Uncle Sams, nor the greedy nephews and nieces sitting in DC and other gov&amp;#039;t branches.    AND when the tax cuts expire - I will be paying 5k more a year and we DONT make anywhere NEAR $250k - about a quarter of that actually - AND due to BO&amp;#039;s care plan, we were notified we must pay an additional $400 more a MONTH in premiums beginning Jan 2011.  I don&amp;#039;t want to hear the spew about how ONLY the rich are getting hit because it&amp;#039;s the little people who ARE hit.  And hit hard.  I have two kids in college, my money is spoken for and now we have to figure out HOW we are supposed to continue contributing to their schooling when we now are FORCED to pay an additional 4K a year in premiums.  Now we can no longer afford to save for our retirement due to this &amp;#039;great plan that won&amp;#039;t cost anyone anything&amp;#039;  .. oh, and our FP also notified they will no longer be taking our insurance.   Another little side affect of BO care.   The ONLY ones who are making out on BO&amp;#039;s plans are those that do NOT work and got their hands out.    And Petroglyph, my condolences to you and your wife.     My father has already distributed his money to all 6 of us, he does not want it going to BO &amp;amp; Co - and he voted for the turd! - and is completing the sale of his home so he doesn&amp;#039;t get hit extra hard next year with those new rules.  That money will be going into a trust fund for all the grandchildren for their schooling, with him moving in with my brother and he is going to live off his social security for whatever time he has left.  Tomorrow will be the first time he ever votes for a republican.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/dmitchell/2010/10/31/should-we-blame-obama-rangel-and-baucus-if-people-die-to-escape-the-death-tax/#IDComment107177390</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Email Reveals ABC News Walked Back &#039;Bigs&#039; Publisher Participation in Election Night Coverage</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/10/31/email-reveals-abc-news-walked-back-bigs-publisher-participation-in-election-night-coverage/#IDComment107171849</link>
<description>Andrew - I&amp;#039;ll watch for your tweets but NEVER will I subject myself to anything from the MoronStreamedMedia.  I  cannot handle their stupidity nor their lack of ethics. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/10/31/email-reveals-abc-news-walked-back-bigs-publisher-participation-in-election-night-coverage/#IDComment107171849</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Anchorage CBS Affiliate Caught on Voicemail Conspiring Against Alaska&#039;s GOP Senate Candidate-Updated</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/10/30/anchorage-cbs-affiliate-caught-on-voicemail-conspiring-against-alaskas-gop-senate-candidate/#IDComment107025523</link>
<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=448505023434&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=44850502...&lt;/a&gt;    here is what Sarah had to say about it   :) </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/10/30/anchorage-cbs-affiliate-caught-on-voicemail-conspiring-against-alaskas-gop-senate-candidate/#IDComment107025523</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : MoveOn Protester Stomped on at Kentucky Senate Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/moveon-protester-stomped-on-at-kentucky-senate-debate/#IDComment106176208</link>
<description>Of course it was staged - the fact that the camera caught &amp;#039;just enough&amp;#039; but NOT enough is one of the clues.  I hope whomever laid the foot upon her shoulder and than used it to push her down (uh.. that wasn&amp;#039;t your head sweetie .. ) is prosecuted.  WHOMEVER it was.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/moveon-protester-stomped-on-at-kentucky-senate-debate/#IDComment106176208</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : MoveOn Protester Stomped on at Kentucky Senate Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/moveon-protester-stomped-on-at-kentucky-senate-debate/#IDComment106175085</link>
<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/moveon/5093756138/in/set-72157624944709765/lightbox/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/moveon/5093756138/in...&lt;/a&gt;      &amp;#039;gentleman&amp;#039; in middle of last row looks like the one that stepped on her shoulder, than giving an extra push down  -  just my .02   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/moveon-protester-stomped-on-at-kentucky-senate-debate/#IDComment106175085</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Census Bureau Severs Ties With ACORN</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/11/census-bureau-severs-ties-with-acorn/#IDComment34069457</link>
<description>ah, it&amp;#039;s a TERRIFIC start, but we know that BHO and clan will be sticking their noses in, saying how it&amp;#039;s just a few people.     um.  No.  It&amp;#039;s the WHOLE group.  It&amp;#039;s how they were trained to &amp;#039;get business, and information on people&amp;#039;  - they are probably gathering info for 2012 election  - does anyone REALLY believe that BHO was elected?  with how many states citing fraud and illegal votes being cast?  those are JUST the ones caught.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/09/11/census-bureau-severs-ties-with-acorn/#IDComment34069457</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>