<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/604929</link>
		<description>Comments by Fulker01</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood&#039;s Oxymoronic Definition of &#039;Liberal Tolerance&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bhallowell/2009/07/13/hollywoods-assault-on-free-speech/#IDComment27174496</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s an excellent question and one I ask almost daily.  I for one am conservative on most issues social or fiscal.  That being said, my religion has had little to no influence on those decisions.  Gay marriage for example I do not condemn but rather condemn the creation of any law requiring a population to accept or deny it.  Either one would inevitably become a Jim Crowe law and eventually be a legal foothold for special rights interests. Special rights (i.e. Affirmative Action, Scholarships, etc.) I do not feel a person deserves based on sexual preference.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bhallowell/2009/07/13/hollywoods-assault-on-free-speech/#IDComment27174496</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood&#039;s Oxymoronic Definition of &#039;Liberal Tolerance&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bhallowell/2009/07/13/hollywoods-assault-on-free-speech/#IDComment27173954</link>
<description>I couldn&amp;#039;t watch 24 this season because she was on it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bhallowell/2009/07/13/hollywoods-assault-on-free-speech/#IDComment27173954</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood&#039;s Oxymoronic Definition of &#039;Liberal Tolerance&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bhallowell/2009/07/13/hollywoods-assault-on-free-speech/#IDComment27173815</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.&amp;quot;  -WFB  I always found that to be not only humorous but true. As an actor and a graduate of a very liberal college (redundant?) I am unable to discuss these issues with my friends as the simple math involved in any argument against most of what Obama is willfully disregarded and rendered inconsequential.  Each day I am more and more reminded of the videos of Hitler&amp;#039;s youth singing songs to the Fuhrer.  And so many of these people, whose intelligence I greatly respect on all but political issues,  can&amp;#039;t (or won&amp;#039;t) listen to a coherent, logical argument that contradicts their own view.    Perhaps we can&amp;#039;t argue with them because their only weapon is volume.  If allowed to speak, a conservative argument will invariably be the sensical one while the liberal argument, shown to be full of fallacy and lofty prerequisite happenstance, falls to pieces. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bhallowell/2009/07/13/hollywoods-assault-on-free-speech/#IDComment27173815</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>