<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2093638</link>
		<description>Comments by FredZarguna</description>
<item>
<title>KATU - Portland, OR : Daring pack of kids raid SE Portland store | Local &amp; Regional | KATU.com - Portland News, Sports, Tr</title>
<link>http://www.katu.com/news/local/Daring-pack-of-kids-steal-from-SE-Portland-store-146769415.html#IDComment336164704</link>
<description>So, in the author&amp;#039;s thesaurus &amp;quot;daring&amp;quot; is apparently a synonym for &amp;quot;cowardly.&amp;quot;  Surprising the headline didn&amp;#039;t read:   Daring activists self-administer social justice at SE Portland store.  But I&amp;#039;m sure that&amp;#039;s coming.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.katu.com/news/local/Daring-pack-of-kids-steal-from-SE-Portland-store-146769415.html#IDComment336164704</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;The Lorax&#039; Review: Eco-Hypocrisy Leavened By Whimsical Creatures</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306509445</link>
<description>Of course you can. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 20:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306509445</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;The Lorax&#039; Review: Eco-Hypocrisy Leavened By Whimsical Creatures</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306507145</link>
<description>Like the KKK Democrats of yore Geisel could never draw anything so racist he couldn&amp;#039;t eventually be rehabilitated.  Let&amp;#039;s face it: as a useful idiot and fellow traveler  for the Soviet Union, few have flown as successfully under the radar as he.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 20:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306507145</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;The Lorax&#039; Review: Eco-Hypocrisy Leavened By Whimsical Creatures</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306492813</link>
<description>Good one.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 20:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306492813</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;The Lorax&#039; Review: Eco-Hypocrisy Leavened By Whimsical Creatures</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306492195</link>
<description>It is if your kid is 4 years old or younger, or has an IQ of about 60.  Otherwise, it&amp;#039;s the trite garbage that elementary school teachers find engaging but kids who actually read regard as twaddle. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 20:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306492195</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;The Lorax&#039; Review: Eco-Hypocrisy Leavened By Whimsical Creatures</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306491153</link>
<description>Sorry, but doctor Seuss was a far left idiot and his books are awful; I never knew any kid who was a reader who actually thought they were worth crap, and a few who flirted with them quickly outgrew them.  My own children found his books execrable.  Good for them.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/03/02/the-lorax-review-seussian-eco/#IDComment306491153</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278015465</link>
<description>You don&amp;#039;t. Stay lame. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278015465</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278014261</link>
<description>So gays get into circle-jerks of hate?  Sounds like a homophobic comment to me. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278014261</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278006508</link>
<description>Or &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; mom. [If a turkey baster is your dad.] </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278006508</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278005120</link>
<description>And &amp;quot;Let&amp;#039;s-Get-Out-Of-This-Lame-O-Comedy-Routine&amp;quot; is the designated hitter. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278005120</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278003452</link>
<description>Where did I say I haven&amp;#039;t heard of her?   FNC ratings are down because they&amp;#039;ve been trending so obviously to the left.  Nearly everyone at the network who isn&amp;#039;t actually a liberal (Shep, Greta, Bechtel, and so on) is a Romneybot.   Nobody&amp;#039;s interested in that c r a p; we can get the from the collaborationist press.     As for the rest of your content-free rejoinder, &amp;quot;mainstream&amp;quot; isn&amp;#039;t defined as &amp;quot;the only network where people actually show professionalism being the most popular.&amp;quot;  Mainstream is defined as what the overwhelming majority of news outlets push as the party line. That&amp;#039;s what lazy TV &amp;quot;journalists&amp;quot; read in the &lt;i&gt;NYT&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;WaPo&lt;/i&gt; at breakfast, and what members of the thundering herd of &amp;quot;free-thinkers&amp;quot; such as yourself suck up without questioning for the rest of the day, every day. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment278003452</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276533058</link>
<description>Derogatory slur.  As opposed to complimentary slurs. Or derogatory praise. Duh squared.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276533058</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276530206</link>
<description>He wasn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;offered&amp;quot; a television show. He had a show in syndication for four years. Duh. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276530206</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276517086</link>
<description>Somebody learned how to use cut and paste today.  How cute. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276517086</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276318996</link>
<description>When you&amp;#039;re not well, you&amp;#039;re Richard Madcow? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276318996</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276318288</link>
<description>Congratulations: you have won the award for gormless irony for the entire Internet for 1/27/2012.   [I know, you only troll here because you&amp;#039;re on disability for sawing limbs off you were on the wrong side of one too many times...] </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276318288</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276314890</link>
<description>If that woman (oddly, named &amp;quot;Keith,&amp;quot; but never mind) wants to live her life as a man, I support her decision.  And I support Rachel&amp;#039;s decision to do that, too.   I&amp;#039;m just grateful I don&amp;#039;t need to worry about being set up on a blind date with either one... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276314890</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276310792</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;d better stay away from him; he&amp;#039;ll rip your lungs out, Jim. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276310792</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276310084</link>
<description>Your posting history and rating speak for your veracity, so we&amp;#039;re all pretty sure you&amp;#039;ve got a &lt;i&gt;great&lt;/i&gt; life. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276310084</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276307816</link>
<description>Based on what their advertising revenue is for her show, they were already well aware of her appeal.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276307816</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>