<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2435620</link>
		<description>Comments by FormerDirtDart</description>
<item>
<title>Defense Tech : We\&#039;re Back! Thank You for Your Patience</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2015/12/30/were-back-thank-you-for-your-patience/#IDComment1008275046</link>
<description>Is there a plan to eventually use the same comment system across DoDBuzz, DefenseTech &amp;amp; the News section? Or is the intent to use the current goat rope of three separate systems? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2015/12/30/were-back-thank-you-for-your-patience/#IDComment1008275046</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Video: F-35 Completes First Aerial Gun Test</title>
<link>http://50.87.248.111/~militbe2/dodbuzz.com/2015/11/17/35038/#IDComment1002291578</link>
<description>The F-35 &amp;quot;gun problem&amp;quot; everyone keeps twisting their panties over primarily concerns the B &amp;amp; C variants, as their cannon are an external attachement </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2015 05:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://50.87.248.111/~militbe2/dodbuzz.com/2015/11/17/35038/#IDComment1002291578</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Best Photos of Runaway Army Blimp</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2015/10/29/best-photos-of-runaway-army-blimp/#IDComment1001793337</link>
<description>Historically, tethered military observation balloons would be Civil War tech </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2015/10/29/best-photos-of-runaway-army-blimp/#IDComment1001793337</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Toyota: The Islamic State&#039;s Vehicle of Choice</title>
<link>http://50.87.248.111/~militbe2/dodbuzz.com/2015/10/07/toyota-the-islamic-states-vehicle-of-choice/#IDComment998476167</link>
<description>The &amp;quot;universal desert beige&amp;quot; color appears to be dirt. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthandaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ISIS-toyota.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.truthandaction.org/wp-content/uploads/...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2015 02:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://50.87.248.111/~militbe2/dodbuzz.com/2015/10/07/toyota-the-islamic-states-vehicle-of-choice/#IDComment998476167</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Strike Highlights Russia&#039;s Advances in Cruise Missile Technology</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2015/10/08/strike-highlights-russias-advances-in-cruise-missile-technology/#IDComment998471650</link>
<description>Yeah, maybe in like 1980 an ~16% failure rate would seem not completely terrible. But, in 2015, not so much.  Whole article makes me think it was done very early after info of the strike was released, and set to publish automatically today. Long before word came out about the four missiles going down well short. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2015 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2015/10/08/strike-highlights-russias-advances-in-cruise-missile-technology/#IDComment998471650</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : U.S. Army Testing Light Recon Vehicles</title>
<link>http://50.87.248.111/~militbe2/dodbuzz.com/2015/09/24/u-s-army-testing-light-recon-vehicles/#IDComment997232204</link>
<description>The M113 is the older vehicle, it preceded the M114 in service,  The M114 was intended to replace the Jeeps used in Armored &amp;amp; Armored Infantry Battalion Scout Platoons, and the Jeeps used in Armored Cavalry Platoons.  They saw service throughout the US Army past 1973, but only saw use in Vietnam from &amp;#039;62 to &amp;#039;64 when replaced by the M113 ACAV variant.  FMC, maked of the M113 would go on to develop the Lynx (M113&amp;frac12; Command and Reconnaissance Vehicle) on their own dime, which the Canadians and a few other countries selected a few years after the M114 was introduced. Basically a reduces size M113, using many of the same components. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://50.87.248.111/~militbe2/dodbuzz.com/2015/09/24/u-s-army-testing-light-recon-vehicles/#IDComment997232204</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : U.S. Army Testing Light Recon Vehicles</title>
<link>http://50.87.248.111/~militbe2/dodbuzz.com/2015/09/24/u-s-army-testing-light-recon-vehicles/#IDComment996717771</link>
<description>The M114 was not a command variant of the M113, it was a completely different significantly smaller vehicle </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://50.87.248.111/~militbe2/dodbuzz.com/2015/09/24/u-s-army-testing-light-recon-vehicles/#IDComment996717771</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Kit Up! : First Two Female Ranger Graduates Identified</title>
<link>http://kitup.military.com/2015/08/female-ranger-graduates-identified.html#IDComment991344635</link>
<description>No General Officers are certified to grade patrols in Ranger School. By regulation only certified Ranger School personnel can grade patrols. There is no such thing as APL patrols in Ranger School.  Why must you result to lies? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://kitup.military.com/2015/08/female-ranger-graduates-identified.html#IDComment991344635</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Kit Up! : First Two Female Ranger Graduates Identified</title>
<link>http://kitup.military.com/2015/08/female-ranger-graduates-identified.html#IDComment991303228</link>
<description>I had a Chinook pilot in my platoon in Ranger School, Had a few helicopter pilots go through while I was an RI, Perchance you are the reason you haven&amp;#039;t gone to Ranger School. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://kitup.military.com/2015/08/female-ranger-graduates-identified.html#IDComment991303228</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Drone Flies First Search-and-Rescue Mission in California</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2015/07/30/drone-flies-first-search-and-rescue-mission-in-california/#IDComment988274756</link>
<description>NOAA has used both the ScanEagle and RQ-20 USCG has evaluated a number of tier I UAV in operational test, along with operating ScanEagle. And, joint operation of R/MQ-1 &amp;amp; 9 with CBP </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2015/07/30/drone-flies-first-search-and-rescue-mission-in-california/#IDComment988274756</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Future Choppers Must Share More Parts, Officials Say</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2015/07/22/future-choppers-must-share-more-parts-officials-say/#IDComment986771649</link>
<description>I guess we can be grateful that the UH-60 and AH-64 at least share the same engine </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2015/07/22/future-choppers-must-share-more-parts-officials-say/#IDComment986771649</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Future Choppers Must Share More Parts, Officials Say</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2015/07/22/future-choppers-must-share-more-parts-officials-say/#IDComment986517147</link>
<description>The UH-1Y and AH-1Z share a common tail boom, engines, rotor system, drive train, avionics architecture, software, controls and displays for over 84% identical components.  Perhaps someday you will stop making a fool of yourself. But, I doubt it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2015/07/22/future-choppers-must-share-more-parts-officials-say/#IDComment986517147</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Kit Up! : Army&#039;s Top Enlistee Proposes &#039;Ike Jacket&#039; for Army Dress Uniform</title>
<link>http://kitup.military.com/2015/07/armys-top-enlistee-proposes-ike.html#IDComment986383715</link>
<description>Want an Ike jacket? Go back to &amp;quot;Pinks &amp;amp; Greens&amp;quot; Problem with wearing the Ike jacket to essentially replace the black windbreaker is that the windbreaker when worn with class-B&amp;#039;s doesn&amp;#039;t require a tie. While I hardly see that happening with an Ike jacket.  I would recommend adopting the enlisted windbreaker for all ranks, in the same blue color as the ASU jacket with officers and NCOs wearing same rank shoulder boards as with the white shirt.  Screw the silly a$$ service caps.  Yes, women should wear the same styled headgear as men. Heck, I would recommend deleting the women&amp;#039;s skirts and pumps from the uniform inventory. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://kitup.military.com/2015/07/armys-top-enlistee-proposes-ike.html#IDComment986383715</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Australian Navy Backs Off From F-35B Joint Strike Fighter</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2015/07/10/australian-navy-cancels-order-for-the-f-35b-joint-strike-fighter/#IDComment984086804</link>
<description>The ships were ordered long before the Abbot administration entered office, and gave any consideration to acquire B models. It was cheaper to buy the ships as designed with the ramp, than have it redesigned without. Those are the facts. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 02:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2015/07/10/australian-navy-cancels-order-for-the-f-35b-joint-strike-fighter/#IDComment984086804</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Russia’s Satellite Nuclear Warning System Down Until November</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2015/06/30/russias-satellite-nuclear-warning-system-down-until-november/#IDComment981956625</link>
<description>Please, please get back on your meds </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2015/06/30/russias-satellite-nuclear-warning-system-down-until-november/#IDComment981956625</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Boeing Looks to Sell Retired A-10 Warthogs Abroad</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2015/06/16/boeing-looks-to-sell-retired-a-10-warthogs-abroad/#IDComment978690361</link>
<description>If there is really a secondary market, wouldn&amp;#039;t someone have been asking about the several hundred A-10s already in the boneyards? My inner cynic thinks this is more an attempt to lobby Congress to force the USAF to retain the aircraft in regular service, or risk losing them for good. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2015/06/16/boeing-looks-to-sell-retired-a-10-warthogs-abroad/#IDComment978690361</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Navy Preps to Build Next Generation LXR Amphibious Assault Ship</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2015/05/26/navy-preps-to-build-next-generation-lxr-amphibious-assault-ship/#IDComment974257853</link>
<description>Thank you for the correction, and additional information.  I was basing my assumptions on the Wasp decommissioning at near the 35 year mark. Which would have marginally exceeded the average lifespan of the Tarawa-class, but matched that of USS Peleliu </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 16:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2015/05/26/navy-preps-to-build-next-generation-lxr-amphibious-assault-ship/#IDComment974257853</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Navy Preps to Build Next Generation LXR Amphibious Assault Ship</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2015/05/26/navy-preps-to-build-next-generation-lxr-amphibious-assault-ship/#IDComment974249544</link>
<description>Apparently you expect the Wasp-class ships to last forever. The US Navy intends to operate 11 LHD/LHA type vessels. By the time the USS Tripoli (2nd America-class) enters commission the USS Wasp will have likely been in commission at least 30 years.  The third through eleventh America-class ships (or whatever they decide to call the well-deck variant) are intended to replace the Wasp-class, on a one for one basis. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 15:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2015/05/26/navy-preps-to-build-next-generation-lxr-amphibious-assault-ship/#IDComment974249544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Kit Up! : Textron Unveils Ultra-Light 7.62mm Machine Gun Effort</title>
<link>http://kitup.military.com/2015/05/textron-unveils-ultra-light-7.html#IDComment972804672</link>
<description>why don&amp;#039;t you try posting a real link </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 05:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://kitup.military.com/2015/05/textron-unveils-ultra-light-7.html#IDComment972804672</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Kit Up! : Textron Unveils Ultra-Light 7.62mm Machine Gun Effort</title>
<link>http://kitup.military.com/2015/05/textron-unveils-ultra-light-7.html#IDComment972735335</link>
<description>OK, they are not developing a 6.5mm carbine or ammunition. That&amp;#039;s just nonsense.  The LSAT program is developing weapons to fire 5.56mm and 7.62mm caseless (CL) &amp;amp; cased telescopic (CT) ammunition.  They are using 5.56mm and 7,62mm so they can use current weapons and ammo as a baseline. This way they can accurately determine what realistic weight savings can be found. And, compare weapons &amp;amp; ammunition operability, durability and  effectiveness.  Yes, the program has, since it&amp;#039;s inception, been targeted for scalability. To be able to adapt to any caliber of ammunition, if so desired IN THE FUTURE.  No such decision has been made. And frankly, there is no chance a change of caliber decision will be made until an ammunition path (CT or CL) has been finalized. And, that can&amp;#039;t happen until actual tests against the baseline have been completed.  Anyone offering other information is simply spreading unrealistic and uninformed internet chat room gossip. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://kitup.military.com/2015/05/textron-unveils-ultra-light-7.html#IDComment972735335</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>