<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/473861</link>
		<description>Comments by Fluke</description>
<item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : </title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/42333407.html#IDComment18034699</link>
<description>Yeah, because California so obviously had it all under control when they imposed similar legislation... And on a totally separate but coincidental note did anyone else catch our super-Governors address about stimulus money spending? That we should work on spending all of the money quickly, so that way we can grab the other state&amp;#039;s that don&amp;#039;t spend their money as fast, money? Wow. That should make everyone here quiver in their undies. To think that&amp;#039;s the attitude of the local state government is beyond words. Yet, I think it sums up exactly what their priorities are. Now apply that shining bit of logic to State Spending in regards to Tax increases...   I&amp;#039;d have to say that with the current politicians in office, and yes, I mean politicians in it&amp;#039;s truest sense of the word, a State Income Tax sounds like a catastrophic idea for the everyday person. And we&amp;#039;re all everyday people. Well, most of us. Ken has his moments...   &amp;quot;opus8no5&amp;quot; quoted Margaret Thatcher. I&amp;#039;d like to second that... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Apr 2009 19:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/42333407.html#IDComment18034699</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>