<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/294424</link>
		<description>Comments by Farhan_Thawar</description>
<item>
<title>MoneySense : The perfect price: Business suits</title>
<link>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/09/25/the-perfect-price-to-pay-for-a-business-suit/#IDComment448351670</link>
<description>Uhh.. the print magazine says $800-$1,000?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.moneysense.ca/2012/09/25/the-perfect-price-to-pay-for-a-business-suit/#IDComment448351670</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DavidCrow.ca : Canadians, Canadians, Canadians</title>
<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/7247/canadians-canadians-canadians#IDComment38983745</link>
<description>Disagree... it was this talk that changed my mind about Ballmer: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/headlines/microsoft-ballmer.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/headlines/micros...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidcrow.ca/article/7247/canadians-canadians-canadians#IDComment38983745</guid>
</item><item>
<title>StartupCFO : Pen and Paper</title>
<link>http://startupcfo.ca/2009/06/pen-and-paper.html#IDComment24621230</link>
<description>You and Austin have hit the nail on the head.  It&amp;#039;s the CONSTRAINT of paper that is the key.  Use index cards :) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://startupcfo.ca/2009/06/pen-and-paper.html#IDComment24621230</guid>
</item><item>
<title>StartupCFO : Startup Accelerators</title>
<link>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2009/06/startup-accelerators.html#IDComment23351113</link>
<description>Great post (agree with the idea of &amp;quot;but what&amp;#039;s the return?&amp;quot;).  Not sure if you saw this, but we&amp;#039;re launching a new program as well: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/8cnkR&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/8cnkR&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.startupcfo.ca/2009/06/startup-accelerators.html#IDComment23351113</guid>
</item><item>
<title>StartupCFO : Managing e-mail: You\&#039;re just not that important</title>
<link>http://startupcfo.ca/2009/03/managing-e-mail-youre-just-not-that.html#IDComment17857857</link>
<description>You basically summed up the Four Hour workweek in 3 seconds :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://startupcfo.ca/2009/03/managing-e-mail-youre-just-not-that.html#IDComment17857857</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DavidCrow.ca : Business pr0n</title>
<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/7025/business-pr0n#IDComment14008088</link>
<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.portfolio.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.portfolio.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidcrow.ca/article/7025/business-pr0n#IDComment14008088</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jay Goldman : Malcolm Gladwell Talks About Outliers at Rotman School of Management</title>
<link>http://jaygoldman.com/2008/12/malcolm-gladwell-talks-about-outliers-at-rotman-school-of-management/#IDComment13483661</link>
<description>I agree with Fernando&amp;#039;s comments on causality vs. correlation.  It was my main beef with the book and while it was an interesting read (along with Tipping Point and likely Blink, which I haven&amp;#039;t read yet), it&amp;#039;s very very very hard to make any causal argument using Gladwell&amp;#039;s treatment of the statistics.    Actually, due to the experiment design, I doubt one could come in afterwards and claim causality anywhere :( </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://jaygoldman.com/2008/12/malcolm-gladwell-talks-about-outliers-at-rotman-school-of-management/#IDComment13483661</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>