<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/718731</link>
		<description>Comments by FCK</description>
<item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : C for Key</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/02/09/c-for-key/#IDComment55993144</link>
<description>Key also signaled income tax cuts. While I don&amp;#039;t think the package is great, or bold enough to catch Aus, I would say that it&amp;#039;s a hell of a lot better than the alternative. And as you say, if you really want to get rid of the ETS, vote ACT. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/02/09/c-for-key/#IDComment55993144</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : C for Key</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/02/09/c-for-key/#IDComment55993031</link>
<description>Look, I understand lots of NZers depend on property income to make ends meet. That said, if you pay &amp;quot;a lot of tax&amp;quot; I&amp;#039;d guess that&amp;#039;s probably company and income tax, both of which I think should be significantly reduced and flattened. That would help not just yourself, but every other business.  Of course carpets, et al depreciate. But every accounting student knows that that depreciation is a quick way to cut your tax burden on other work. That would be fine if everyone else could do it (i.e. the productive sector) but the reality is they can&amp;#039;t.  Not heard of LAQCs being widely used in the productive sector.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/02/09/c-for-key/#IDComment55993031</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Minimum wages and unemployment</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/02/02/minimum-wages-and-unemployment/#IDComment54982721</link>
<description>Oh FCK. That&amp;#039;s embarrassing. Better fix that... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/02/02/minimum-wages-and-unemployment/#IDComment54982721</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Minimum wages and unemployment</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/02/02/minimum-wages-and-unemployment/#IDComment54961554</link>
<description>Well yes, correlation = 1, and across the entire data set it&amp;#039;s =0.5; that tends to vindicate my argument that it&amp;#039;s not always the minimum wage that cuts employment. I&amp;#039;m sure if you looked at the data series from the mid-80s to mid 90s the correlation would be stronger. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/02/02/minimum-wages-and-unemployment/#IDComment54961554</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Whale Oil Beef Hooked | Gotcha! : Tiger&#039;s Internet Addiction</title>
<link>http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/29/tigers-internet-addiction/#IDComment54424296</link>
<description>Heh, Collins is there for the &amp;quot;Safer Communities Together&amp;quot; message... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/29/tigers-internet-addiction/#IDComment54424296</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Screw the Wowsers</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/29/screw-the-wowsers/#IDComment54291047</link>
<description>Sadly no, John Q - it seems only 30% were against banning, the rest were fence-sitters. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/29/screw-the-wowsers/#IDComment54291047</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Tax and Zen*</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/12/taxation-and-zen/#IDComment51643065</link>
<description>Oh, and spot on for Sex and Zen...  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/12/taxation-and-zen/#IDComment51643065</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Tax and Zen*</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/12/taxation-and-zen/#IDComment51642932</link>
<description>Yeah, that&amp;#039;s just for revenue received from customers though, not necessarily the sorts of transactions required to keep a business running. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/12/taxation-and-zen/#IDComment51642932</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Tax and Zen*</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/12/taxation-and-zen/#IDComment51642681</link>
<description>Yeah, but we&amp;#039;d have to slash spending to do that... oh well... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/12/taxation-and-zen/#IDComment51642681</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Let&#039;s put the flag to a vote</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/20/lets-put-the-flag-to-a-vote/#IDComment51552787</link>
<description>Of course not James - the crime of sedition was abolished in 2008. Treason, overthrowing the state by force, remains a crime though, but flying a flag certainly isn&amp;#039;t treason. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/20/lets-put-the-flag-to-a-vote/#IDComment51552787</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Brewer is right, and wrong</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/11/brewer-is-right-and-wrong/#IDComment51415966</link>
<description>Yep, you&amp;#039;ve nailed it. Cullen was a much more effective Finance Minister in terms of getting what he wanted. English seems to be content with maintaining the Government&amp;#039;s popularity. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2010/01/11/brewer-is-right-and-wrong/#IDComment51415966</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Let&#039;s put the flag to a vote</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/20/lets-put-the-flag-to-a-vote/#IDComment48056087</link>
<description>Agreed Thor. I like the flag above as it combines the two good elements of our current flag: red, white and blue of the British union flag (aka the Union Jack) while using the south pacific symbol of the Southern Cross (a constellation used by both Maori and Europeans to navigate to New Zealand) and, of course, the silver fern, a symbol for which New Zealand is well known internationally. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/20/lets-put-the-flag-to-a-vote/#IDComment48056087</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Let&#039;s put the flag to a vote</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/20/lets-put-the-flag-to-a-vote/#IDComment48020066</link>
<description>No worries John. Excellent designs. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/20/lets-put-the-flag-to-a-vote/#IDComment48020066</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : GST off for tourists a good idea</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/18/gst-off-for-tourists-a-good-idea/#IDComment47754815</link>
<description>Opps, my bad. I don&amp;#039;t mind being wrong on your maths, because that means the Standard has it all wrong.  By the way, is their a statistical series on tourist spending in Aus? Would be good to refute the Standard&amp;#039;s BS on that too. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/18/gst-off-for-tourists-a-good-idea/#IDComment47754815</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Time for a voter&#039;s veto</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/17/time-for-a-voters-veto/#IDComment47666637</link>
<description>Ah, but that depends on how the question is enacted. The sensible thing to do would be to ensure that Parliament couldn&amp;#039;t employ less that 1 Jan 1995... however that&amp;#039;s not the exact wording of the question.  Full details of how I think a voters&amp;#039; veto should work are here - it would exclude Bills of money and supply:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/11/30/fck-for-a-peoples-veto-not-binding-citizens-intiatives/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/11/30/fck-for-a-peop...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/17/time-for-a-voters-veto/#IDComment47666637</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Lower house prices by cutting income tax</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/16/lower-house-prices-by-cutting-income-tax/#IDComment47503943</link>
<description>Really? The last figures I saw said $500m. $2b seems correct given the amount invested in housing. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/16/lower-house-prices-by-cutting-income-tax/#IDComment47503943</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : GDP To Double</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/10/doubling-gdp/#IDComment46502404</link>
<description>God no - I&amp;#039;ve heard bad things about PNG. My dad&amp;#039;s business attempted to sell building products there in the 1990s. Crime is rampant and wealth disparity massive. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/10/doubling-gdp/#IDComment46502404</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Axe Swings Over Electricity Commission</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/09/axe-swings-over-electricity-commission/#IDComment46485449</link>
<description>Move everything under Internal Affairs? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/09/axe-swings-over-electricity-commission/#IDComment46485449</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Axe Swings Over Electricity Commission</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/09/axe-swings-over-electricity-commission/#IDComment46485221</link>
<description>Move everything under Internal Affairs? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/09/axe-swings-over-electricity-commission/#IDComment46485221</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Fiscally Conservative Kiwi : Axe Swings Over Electricity Commission</title>
<link>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/09/axe-swings-over-electricity-commission/#IDComment46338421</link>
<description>Now, now... let&amp;#039;s not get ahead of ourselves! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 03:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://fck.gotcha.co.nz/2009/12/09/axe-swings-over-electricity-commission/#IDComment46338421</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>