<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/349328</link>
		<description>Comments by ExNYer1995</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Limbaugh comments overshadow GOP contest</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9TA0FI81&show_article=1#IDComment308200676</link>
<description>Typical AP bullcr@p. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9TA0FI81&show_article=1#IDComment308200676</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Higher gas prices cloud Obama\&#039;s re-election hopes</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T3J78O0&show_article=1#IDComment300479507</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t get all the fretting over the &amp;quot;electability&amp;quot; of the Republican nominee.  By the end of this summer, Obama will be TOAST - so we might as well get as conservative a nominee as we can. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T3J78O0&show_article=1#IDComment300479507</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Why Barack Obama Must Overcome His ‘Oppositional Identity’</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jsshapiro/2012/02/19/why-barack-obama-must-overcome-his-oppositional-identity/#IDComment297142965</link>
<description>Slavery existed in the U.S. because Americans are *human beings* first, then Americans.  The beauty of the U.S. Constitution - and why it endures, and does not need to be a &amp;quot;living document&amp;quot; - is that it was written to govern immutable human nature, not as a response to the political realities of its time.  (Thank you for that insight, Mr. Skousen.)  Mr. Obama tells us that our Constitution was &amp;ldquo;stained by this nation&amp;rsquo;s original sin of slavery&amp;rdquo; - but offers no ideas as to how our history might have rolled out differently.  Progressive critics of American history *imply* at least that the correct opening move in the chess game of America would have been to deploy ALL the pieces at once.  That&amp;#039;s ridiculous; it happened in the ONLY way that would have produced a nation that survived (and it barely did survive the Civil War). </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jsshapiro/2012/02/19/why-barack-obama-must-overcome-his-oppositional-identity/#IDComment297142965</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : FLOTUS Makes Candy Makers Shrink Bar Sizes</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/flotus-makes-candy-makers-shrink-bar-sizes/#IDComment296640622</link>
<description>M&amp;amp;M/Mars is using the FLOTUS as an excuse to decrease portion sizes while likely maintaining the same price points (like many of the ice cream companies who no longer offer a half-gallon, and coffee companies whose bags are shrinking further and further from a pound).  There are other candy companies to patronize... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/flotus-makes-candy-makers-shrink-bar-sizes/#IDComment296640622</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Feds Arrest Suicide Bomber Heading To U.S. Capitol</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/feds-arrest-suicide-bomber-heading-to-u-s-capitol/#IDComment296631100</link>
<description>Sounds to me like a setup to show us all how much in control Obama and Big Sis are... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/feds-arrest-suicide-bomber-heading-to-u-s-capitol/#IDComment296631100</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Is Media Matters&#039; David Brock A &#039;Dangerous&#039; Man?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/is-media-matters-david-brock-a-dangerous-man/#IDComment293572858</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve noticed that of the handful of my friends that proudly proclaim themselves &amp;quot;progressives&amp;quot;, even those worthy of debate (i.e, those who could represent their positions in a manner reasonable enough to warrant consideration, and open-minded themselves) have become rarer and rarer.  I think that much of that is due to the existential threat of seeing their world view collapse around them as the evidence mounts, and the fact that divisive rhetoric has been embraced at the highest levels of their chosen &amp;quot;power structure&amp;quot;.  Friends of mine on Facebook have made some of the most hurtful comments without giving their impact a second thought.  When confronted with it, they fall back on generalizations that they&amp;#039;d SWEAR that I, personally, don&amp;#039;t exemplify.  Yet they ramble on about vague, infinitely-relative concepts like &amp;quot;fairness&amp;quot; that they can&amp;#039;t even quantify from their *own* perspective.  How sad... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/is-media-matters-david-brock-a-dangerous-man/#IDComment293572858</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Is Media Matters&#039; David Brock A &#039;Dangerous&#039; Man?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/is-media-matters-david-brock-a-dangerous-man/#IDComment293484556</link>
<description>There are people who are oblivious to their own hypocritical hatefulness, and there are those who just don&amp;#039;t care.  I&amp;#039;m not sure which group *neo__conned* falls into. (Not that it matters; they&amp;#039;re equally pitiable.)    I don&amp;#039;t necessarily believe in God - but I believe in Karma.  And in that context, people like neo__conned make me smile.  But even if THAT doesn&amp;#039;t exist, the time wasted in trying to knock out a bop bag is its own punishment - especially in a godless world where the existence of the self is finite!    Now THAT is a cosmic joke! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/is-media-matters-david-brock-a-dangerous-man/#IDComment293484556</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Bashir: Santorum Like Stalin</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/bashir-santorum-like-stalin/#IDComment292681022</link>
<description>ExNYer1995: Bashir like Corky. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/bashir-santorum-like-stalin/#IDComment292681022</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Analysis: Obama pitches middle while GOP eyes base</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SRPOP03&show_article=1#IDComment290455924</link>
<description>Dream on. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SRPOP03&show_article=1#IDComment290455924</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Whitney Houston Dead at 48, Cause Not Yet Known</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/11/whitney-houston-dead-at-48-cause-not-yet-known/#IDComment290166219</link>
<description>She was &amp;quot;dead&amp;quot; to me when her second ballad was indistinguishable from her first.    Someone like Mariah Carey does not have the vocal gift that Whitney Houston had, but she has shown much greater versatility and is more entertaining.  Never quite got the fuss over Whitney Houston.  Sure, it&amp;#039;s sad that she died and all (though not unexpected), but let&amp;#039;s not drag this out for weeks and weeks and weeks...    PLEASE? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/11/whitney-houston-dead-at-48-cause-not-yet-known/#IDComment290166219</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Analysis: Obama\&#039;s course correction shifts dynamic</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SR5LJ80&show_article=1#IDComment289773105</link>
<description>More wishful thinking on the part of the Obama AP-ologists.  Boy, are you guys in for a rude surprise come November. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SR5LJ80&show_article=1#IDComment289773105</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Leaving \&#039;No Child\&#039; law: Obama lets 10 states flee</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SQ4HD81&show_article=1#IDComment288320548</link>
<description>Undoing signature legislation of a previous president.  We&amp;#039;ll take that under advisement for 2013. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 23:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SQ4HD81&show_article=1#IDComment288320548</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Trump Rips Santorum After Big Wins </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment288283930</link>
<description>In that one point, you are correct: there&amp;#039;s no reason for you to argue with me.  You&amp;#039;re disdainful of others&amp;#039; opinions and you acknowledge the futility of expressing yours on this website - yet you persist.  There&amp;#039;s a psychosis in there somewhere. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 22:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment288283930</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Trump Rips Santorum After Big Wins </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment287828863</link>
<description>So - you&amp;#039;re saying that one can&amp;#039;t applaud even a duncecap like Trump when he gets something RIGHT? (Hell, I and others on this site even applauded OBAMA when he gave the green light to shoot those Somali pirates.)(The ONE thing I can think of that he&amp;#039;s done right as president.)    Giving a big &amp;quot;Here! Here!&amp;quot; to someone doesn&amp;#039;t automatically translate to &amp;quot;loving&amp;quot; him/her (as YOU claimed) or (good grief!) wanting him/her to be the nominee on the Republican ticket. But then, people who think as you do feel they&amp;#039;re the only ones permitted to &amp;quot;a la carte&amp;quot; their viewpoints; for everyone else, there&amp;#039;s no part and parcel. Like some of Ayn Rand&amp;#039;s objectivist viewpoints? You MUST accept her atheism. Like some of Ron Paul&amp;#039;s economic policies? You MUST accept his foreign policies. How narrow-minded!    I withdraw my previous criticism of you. What you really need is a crash course in logic. (Much like Trump. I&amp;#039;m surprised you don&amp;#039;t like him...) And an infusion of civics wouldn&amp;#039;t hurt either. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment287828863</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Trump Rips Santorum After Big Wins </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment287564982</link>
<description>Oops! Just realized I added my reply to your post rather than his. Sorry. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 03:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment287564982</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Saving Women&#039;s Lives* (With a Caveat)</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tobytoons/2012/02/08/saving-womens-lives-with-a-caveat/#IDComment287563503</link>
<description>Running for the Cure.  With Scissors. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 03:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tobytoons/2012/02/08/saving-womens-lives-with-a-caveat/#IDComment287563503</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Oprah Mag Sales Slump, More Fallout from Obama Support?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/08/oprah-mag-sales-slump-more-fallout-from-obama-support/#IDComment287560572</link>
<description>Who? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 02:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/08/oprah-mag-sales-slump-more-fallout-from-obama-support/#IDComment287560572</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Trump Rips Santorum After Big Wins </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment287552962</link>
<description>This is why his book was entitled &amp;quot;The Art of the Deal&amp;quot; and not &amp;quot;The Art of Logical Argument&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 02:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment287552962</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Trump Rips Santorum After Big Wins </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment287551506</link>
<description>Three words for you, &amp;quot;NeoConCity&amp;quot;:  remedial reading course. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 02:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-rips-santorum-after-big-wins/#IDComment287551506</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Gingrich, Santorum &#039;Acted Like Democrats&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-gingrich-santorum-acted-like-democrats/#IDComment287545228</link>
<description>He&amp;#039;s got that &amp;quot;progressive projection&amp;quot; thing (&amp;quot;I&amp;#039;m gonna accuse you of doing what I do myself&amp;quot;) down. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 02:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-gingrich-santorum-acted-like-democrats/#IDComment287545228</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>