<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/739964</link>
		<description>Comments by Englit71</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Chicago Tribune Ignores Massachusetts; Keillor Praises Harry Reid Instead</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/01/20/chicago-tribune-ignores-massachusetts-keillor-praises-harry-reid-instead/#IDComment53197596</link>
<description>The Reverend Mr. Keillor speaketh!  For years, this ass has &amp;quot;entertained&amp;quot; the Public Radio smart set and their grannies with his deadly-dull presentations of massed kazoos, yodeling, and other rubbish, not to neglect his self-indulgent monologues. I understand that he now writes for the once great &amp;quot;New Yorker.&amp;quot;  Can public office be far off? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/01/20/chicago-tribune-ignores-massachusetts-keillor-praises-harry-reid-instead/#IDComment53197596</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Stern\&#039;s threat to quit Sirius could be empty talk</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CNSOH80#IDComment48618472</link>
<description>...or Stern could simply croak. By the way, why isn&amp;#039;t Andrew Breitbart on the radio, in Drudge&amp;#039;s old slot? A natural fit, with Joy Division and other Brit classics as bumper music! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CNSOH80#IDComment48618472</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>